Composite graft replacement of the aortic root in acute dissection

Objective: In acute type A dissection the indication for composite graft replacement of the aortic root and the optimal implantation technique are a matter of debate. In this study early and late results of root replacement in acute dissection are determined and compared with supracoronary graft replacement. Two implantation techniques (open vs. inclusion) are evaluated. Methods: Between 1985 and 1995, 207 consecutive patients (mean age 58±12 years, 78% men) were operated for acute type A dissection of the aorta. Root replacement in 50 patients (inclusion technique in 34/50 patients with Cabrol shunt in 15/34 patients, open technique in 16/50 patients) was compared with more conservative procedures in 157 patients: supracoronary graft replacement in 143 patients (with aortic valve replacement in 23 patients) and local repair without graft interposition in 14 patients. Preoperative risk factors, like hemodynamic instability, renal failure, neurologic disorder and coronary artery disease did not differ in the two treatment groups. Results: Early results, survival and reoperation-free survival after 5 years were insignificantly better after root replacement; mortality 10/50 (20%) vs. 38/157 (24%) P=n.s.; hemorrhage 10/50 (20%) vs. 39/157 (25%) P=n.s.; stroke 5/50 (10%) vs. 27/157 (17%) P=n.s.; survival 70±7% vs. 63±4%, reoperation free survival 92±6% vs. 78±5% P=0.0815). For the open technique, early mortality was 18.8 vs. 20.6%, P=n.s. and reoperation free survival at 5 years was 80.7 vs. 65.2%, P=n.s. Perioperative complications did not differ in the two technical groups and a single pseudoaneurysm occurred in the Bentall group. Conclusion: In acute dissection composite graft replacement of the aortic root can be carried out with good early and late results not inferior to more conservative procedures. The open technique is the implantation method of choice and the modified Bentall technique is indicated in situations with increased risk of bleedin

Does retrograde cerebral perfusion via superior vena cava cannulation protect the brain?

Objective: The retrograde cerebral perfusion via cannulation of the superior vena cava is a widespread method for optimising protection of the brain during hypothermic circulatory arrest. Methods: In 14 cadavers (8 females, 6 males) of the local department of pathology, an examination was performed to check the competence of the valves of the internal jugular veins. After a complete preparation of the superior vena cava, the innominate vein and both internal jugular veins, ligating all side branches, a retrograde perfusion on 7 cadavers was installed, documenting flow and pressure of each internal jugular vein (IJV) in vitro. Afterwards, the veins were opened and their valves inspected. Results: In all 14 cadavers, anatomically and functionally competent valves on the right proximal IJV were found. Only 1/14 cadaver had no valve in the left proximal IJV. Additional rudimentary and incompetent valves could be identified in 1/14 cadaver on the distal right IJV, and in 2/14 cadavers on the left IJV. Retrograde flow measurement of 7/14 cadavers revealed 0ml/min in 4/7 cadavers, 6ml/min in 1/7, 340ml/min in 1/7 and 2500ml/min in 1/7 cadaver. Conclusions: As a rule, anatomically and functionally competent valves in the proximal IJV are present. In human beings, they obstruct the direct retrograde inlet to the intracranial venous system, which suggests an unbalanced and unreliable perfusion of the brain. Therefore, retrograde cerebral perfusion by cannulating the superior vena cava may help flushing out embolism and supporting ‘the cold jacket' of the brain. However, its effect of retrograde backflow cannot be a sign of adequate cerebral perfusio

Surgery for acute type a aortic dissection: comparison of techniques

Objective: In order to determine the optimal surgical strategy for acute ascending aortic dissection, the graft inclusion technique was compared with the open resection technique. Methods: Between 1985 and 1995 a consecutive series of 193 patients (77% male, mean age 58 years) had emergency surgery during a mean interval of 13.2 h after onset of symptoms. Graft replacement of the ascending aorta was performed in all patients (supracoronary graft 143/193=74%, aortic root replacement 50/193=26%, aortic valve replacement 73/193=38%, arch replacement 44/193=20%) The open resection technique was applied in 93 patients and the inclusion technique in 100 patients with a Cabrol-shunt in 26%. Preoperative risk factors were equally distributed between groups (inclusion technique vs. open technique): left ventricular ejection fraction≪45% (13 vs. 2%, not significant (n.s.)), neurological deficit (31 vs. 25%; n.s.), systolic blood pressure≪90 mmHg (20 vs. 15%, n.s.) pericardial tamponade (25 vs. 9%, n.s.), renal failure (6 vs. 4%; n.s.). Results: The overall early mortality was 24%. Following graft inclusion it was 31% compared with 16% in the open technique group (P=0.0154). Postoperative complications (graft inclusion vs. open technique): myocardial infarction (9 vs. 12%, n.s.), low cardiac output (40 vs. 32%, n.s.), reexploration for hemorrhage (23 vs. 25%, n.s.). Survival at 8 years was significantly increased in the open technique group (P=0.0300). Pseudoaneurysm formation occurred in 3% of patients and only after graft inclusion. Freedom from reoperation was 80% at 8 years and did not differ between groups. Graft inclusion was an independent significant predictor of early (P=0.0069; relative risk=2.3673) and late mortality (P=0.0119; relative risk=2.0981). Conclusions: Surgery of acute ascending aortic dissection still carries a considerable early mortality whereas the late outcome is satisfactory. The open resection technique is the method of choice showing superior early and late results and avoiding pseudoaneurysm formation. The inclusion technique may be indicated in situations with increased risk of bleeding. A consequent decompression of the perigraft-space could reduce the rate of pseudoaneurysm

Rust for secure IoT applications : why C is getting rusty

Memory corruption is still the most used type of exploit in today’s malware landscape. Human error inevitably introduces memory vulnerabilities into software by using memory-unsafe languages like C and C++, affecting not only security but also safety, dependability, and even basic functionality of devices. The Rust language guarantees memory safety without a garbage collector, promises comparable performance to C/C++, and allows for gradual extension of existing codebases by using its foreign function interface. This report presents the risks of having memory vulnerabilities in embedded applications, what a switch to Rust looks like, how the development experiences differ between Rust and C/C++, and if there are significant differences in performance