Human capital in Unternehmen: unterschiedliche Ansätze zur Messung des Humankapitals

After a short review on the history of human capital measurement we describe and discuss different approaches that are in use to assess the intangible assetts of an organisation based on knowledge and behaviour. While deductive indicators help to rise the questions on the value of intangible assests, they are inapproriate to build any managerial decision on them. Inductive methods like the Intangible Assets Monitor or the Intellectual Capital Navigator pathed the way to a better understanding of human capital. In the future more holistic appraoches like Balanced Scorecard and the assessments based on the Business Excellence Model of EFQM seem to be even more promising. Nevertheless none of the approaches can yet fulfill the demands of accounting standards. --Human Capital , Intellectual Capital

Differential nasal swab cytology represents a valuable tool for therapy monitoring but not prediction of therapy response in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated with Dupilumab

Introduction: Chronic Rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a common chronic disease with a high impact on patients’ quality of life. If conservative and surgical guideline treatment cannot sufficiently control disease burden, biologicals can be considered as a comparably new treatment option that has revolutionized CRSwNP therapy since the first approval of Dupilumab in 2019. With the aim to select patients who benefit from this new treatment and to find a marker for therapy monitoring, we investigated the cellular composition of nasal mucous membranes and inflammatory cells of patients suffering from CRSwNP and undergoing Dupilumab therapy using non-invasive nasal swab cytology. Methods: Twenty CRSwNP patients with the indication for Dupilumab therapy have been included in this prospective clinical study. In total, five study visits were conducted with ambulatory nasal differential cytology using nasal swabs starting with the beginning of therapy and followed by visits every 3 months for 12 months. First, these cytology samples were stained with the May-GrunwaldGiemsa method (MGG) and the percentage of ciliated cells, mucinous cells, eosinophil cells, neutrophil cells, and lymphocytes was analyzed. Secondly, an immunocytochemical (ICC) ECP-staining was performed to detect eosinophil granulocytes. Additionally, during each study visit the nasal polyp score, SNOT20 questionnaire, olfactometry, the total IgE concentration in peripheral blood as well as the eosinophil cell count in peripheral blood were recorded. The change of parameters was evaluated over one year and the correlation between clinical effectiveness and nasal differential cytology was analyzed. Results: In both MGG (p<0.0001) and ICC analysis (p<0.001) a significant decrease of eosinophils was seen under Dupilumab treatment. When patients were divided into a Eo-low- (<21%) and Eo-high- (≥21%) group according to the percentage eosinophils in nasal swab catology in the first study visit, the Eo-highgroup showed a greater change of eosinophils over time (D17.82) compared to the Eo-low-group (D10.67) but, however, no better response to therapy. The polyp score, SNOT20 questionnaire, and total IgE concentration in peripheral blood showed a significant decrease during the observation period (p<0.0001). Discussion: Nasal swab cytology as an easy-to-apply diagnostic method allows detection and quantification of the different cell populations within the nasal mucosa at a given time. The nasal differential cytology showed a significant decrease of eosinophils during Dupilumab therapy and can therefore be used as non-invasvive method for monitoring therapy success of this cost intensive therapy and potentially can allow an optimized individual therapy planning and management for CRSwNP patients. Since the validity of initial nasal swab eosinophil cell count as a predictive biomarker for therapy response was limited in our study, additional studies including larger number of participants will be necessary to further evaluate the potential benefits for clinical practice of this new diagnostic method

Acid Sphingomyelinase Deficiency Ameliorates Farber Disease

Farber disease is a rare lysosomal storage disorder resulting from acid ceramidase deficiency and subsequent ceramide accumulation. No treatments for Farber disease are clinically available, and affected patients have a severely shortened lifespan. We have recently reported a novel acid ceramidase deficiency model that mirrors the human disease closely. Acid sphingomyelinase is the enzyme that generates ceramide upstream of acid ceramidase in the lysosomes. Using our acid ceramidase deficiency model, we tested if acid sphingomyelinase could be a potential novel therapeutic target for the treatment of Farber disease. A number of functional acid sphingomyelinase inhibitors are clinically available and have been used for decades to treat major depression. Using these as a therapeutic for Farber disease, thus, has the potential to improve central nervous symptoms of the disease as well, something all other treatment options for Farber disease can’t achieve so far. As a proof-of-concept study, we first cross-bred acid ceramidase deficient mice with acid sphingomyelinase deficient mice in order to prevent ceramide accumulation. Double-deficient mice had reduced ceramide accumulation, fewer disease manifestations, and prolonged survival. We next targeted acid sphingomyelinase pharmacologically, to test if these findings would translate to a setting with clinical applicability. Surprisingly, the treatment of acid ceramidase deficient mice with the acid sphingomyelinase inhibitor amitriptyline was toxic to acid ceramidase deficient mice and killed them within a few days of treatment. In conclusion, our study provides the first proof-of-concept that acid sphingomyelinase could be a potential new therapeutic target for Farber disease to reduce disease manifestations and prolong survival. However, we also identified previously unknown toxicity of the functional acid sphingomyelinase inhibitor amitriptyline in the context of Farber disease, strongly cautioning against the use of this substance class for Farber disease patients

Cytology-based Cancer Surgery of the Head and Neck (CyCaS-HN): a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Purpose Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is routinely used in gynecology but is rarely applied in head and neck oncology though many suspicious lesions are easily accessible. While several studies have evaluated the potential use of LBC for early detection and molecular characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), no study investigated its potential role in surgical management and therapy planning so far. Methods Twenty-fve patients with cT1-2 squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx were prospectively enrolled in this study and were randomized to two treatment arms: in the control arm, a diagnostic panendoscopy with incisional biopsy was followed by a second operation with transoral tumor resection±neck dissection and tracheostomy. In the intervention arm, patients underwent LBC diagnostics and in case of a positive result received one single operation with panendoscopy and incisional biopsy for confrmation of LBC result by rapid section histology followed by transoral tumor resection±neck dissection and tracheostomy in the same session. Results Time between clinical diagnosis and defnitive surgical treatment was signifcantly shorter in the intervention group compared with the control group (p<0.0001). Additionally, time of hospitalization (p<0.0001) and cumulative operation time (p=0.062) were shorter in the intervention group. No signifcant diferences in overall, progression-free, and diseasespecifc survival were observed. Conclusion Cytology-based cancer surgery is a promising therapeutic strategy that can potentially be considered for a well-defned group of early-stage HNSCC patients and help to avoid repetitive general anesthesia, shorten the diagnosis-totreatment interval and spare operation as well as hospitalization time

AGO Recommendations for the surgical therapy of breast cancer: update 2022

The recommendations of the AGO Breast Committee on the surgical therapy of breast cancer were last updated in March 2022 (www.ago-online.de). Since surgical therapy is one of several partial steps in the treatment of breast cancer, extensive diagnostic and oncological expertise of a breast surgeon and good interdisciplinary cooperation with diagnostic radiologists is of great importance. The most important changes concern localization techniques, resection margins, axillary management in the neoadjuvant setting and the evaluation of the meshes in reconstructive surgery. Based on meta-analyses of randomized studies, the level of recommendation of an intraoperative breast ultrasound for the localization of non-palpable lesions was elevated to “++”. Thus, the technique is considered to be equivalent to wire localization, provided that it is a lesion which can be well represented by sonography, the surgeon has extensive experience in breast ultrasound and has access to a suitable ultrasound device during the operation. In invasive breast cancer, the aim is to reach negative resection margins (“no tumor on ink”), regardless of whether an extensive intraductal component is present or not. Oncoplastic operations can also replace a mastectomy in selected cases due to the large number of existing techniques, and are equivalent to segmental resection in terms of oncological safety at comparable rates of complications. Sentinel node excision is recommended for patients with cN0 status receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after completion of chemotherapy. Minimally invasive biopsy is recommended for initially suspect lymph nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with initially 1 – 3 suspicious lymph nodes and a good response (ycN0) can receive the targeted axillary dissection and the axillary dissection as equivalent options

AGO recommendations for the surgical therapy of the axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: 2021 Update

For many decades, the standard procedure to treat breast cancer included complete dissection of the axillary lymph nodes. The aim was to determine histological node status, which was then used as the basis for adjuvant therapy, and to ensure locoregional tumour control. In addition to the debate on how to optimise the therapeutic strategies of systemic treatment and radiotherapy, the current discussion focuses on improving surgical procedures to treat breast cancer. As neoadjuvant chemotherapy is becoming increasingly important, the surgical procedures used to treat breast cancer, whether they are breast surgery or axillary dissection, are changing. Based on the currently available data, carrying out SLNE prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. In contrast, surgical axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered the procedure of choice for axillary staging and can range from SLNE to TAD and ALND. To reduce the rate of false negatives during surgical staging of the axilla in pN+(CNB) stage before NACT and ycN0 after NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the removal of > 2 SLNs (SLNE, no untargeted axillary sampling), immunohistochemistry to detect isolated tumour cells and micro-metastases, and marking positive lymph nodes before NACT should be the standard approach. This most recent update on surgical axillary management describes the significance of isolated tumour cells and micro-metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the clinical consequences of low volume residual disease diagnosed using SLNE and TAD and provides an overview of this year's AGO recommendations for surgical management of the axilla during primary surgery and in relation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Table_1_Differential nasal swab cytology represents a valuable tool for therapy monitoring but not prediction of therapy response in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated with Dupilumab.docx

IntroductionChronic Rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a common chronic disease with a high impact on patients’ quality of life. If conservative and surgical guideline treatment cannot sufficiently control disease burden, biologicals can be considered as a comparably new treatment option that has revolutionized CRSwNP therapy since the first approval of Dupilumab in 2019. With the aim to select patients who benefit from this new treatment and to find a marker for therapy monitoring, we investigated the cellular composition of nasal mucous membranes and inflammatory cells of patients suffering from CRSwNP and undergoing Dupilumab therapy using non-invasive nasal swab cytology.MethodsTwenty CRSwNP patients with the indication for Dupilumab therapy have been included in this prospective clinical study. In total, five study visits were conducted with ambulatory nasal differential cytology using nasal swabs starting with the beginning of therapy and followed by visits every 3 months for 12 months. First, these cytology samples were stained with the May-Grunwald-Giemsa method (MGG) and the percentage of ciliated cells, mucinous cells, eosinophil cells, neutrophil cells, and lymphocytes was analyzed. Secondly, an immunocytochemical (ICC) ECP-staining was performed to detect eosinophil granulocytes. Additionally, during each study visit the nasal polyp score, SNOT20 questionnaire, olfactometry, the total IgE concentration in peripheral blood as well as the eosinophil cell count in peripheral blood were recorded. The change of parameters was evaluated over one year and the correlation between clinical effectiveness and nasal differential cytology was analyzed.ResultsIn both MGG (pDiscussionNasal swab cytology as an easy-to-apply diagnostic method allows detection and quantification of the different cell populations within the nasal mucosa at a given time. The nasal differential cytology showed a significant decrease of eosinophils during Dupilumab therapy and can therefore be used as non-invasvive method for monitoring therapy success of this cost intensive therapy and potentially can allow an optimized individual therapy planning and management for CRSwNP patients. Since the validity of initial nasal swab eosinophil cell count as a predictive biomarker for therapy response was limited in our study, additional studies including larger number of participants will be necessary to further evaluate the potential benefits for clinical practice of this new diagnostic method.</p