Is body-contouring surgery a right for massive weight loss patients? A survey through the European Union National Health Systems

Abstract Background Obesity is pandemic nowadays, and hanging skin with consequent functional and psychological impairments is a common price to pay for massive weight loss. Plastic surgery in postbariatric patients represents a fundamental step to regain possession of a positive self-image. The authors aimed to investigate how EU countries' National Health System (NHS) behaves regarding reimbursements for body-contouring procedures after massive weight loss. Methods A 1-item survey was sent to contacts found on the NHS official Web sites of 27 EU countries. The question focused on postbariatric surgery practice and investigated the accessibility criteria for NHS coverage concerning body-contouring procedures after massive weight loss. Results Responses were collected between January 2020 and February 2020. Response rate was 65%, and access criteria to NHS coverage for postbariatric surgery presented great variation across EU countries. Only one country presented an NHS with no coverage for postbariatric surgeries. Conclusions Despite the conspicuous variability found among the EU NHS, none of them admit reimbursement in cases of merely aesthetic procedures: postbariatric patients need to display functional or health impairments due to the extensive weight loss. The results of the current study describe a complex situation among EU countries, but a common lead towards postbariatric patients' care shows off. The ultimate goal of bariatric patient's healing should be full restoration of physical and psychological well-being. NHS of EU countries are facing this increasing request in various ways, and more studies should be performed in order to understand which is the best approach. Level of evidence: Not ratable

Genital Lymphedema and How to Deal with It: Pearls and Pitfalls from over 38 Years of Experience with Unusual Lymphatic System Impairment

Background and Objectives: Conservative treatment represents an essential pillar of lymphedema management, along with debulking and physiologic surgeries. Despite the consistent number of treatment options, there is currently no agreement on their indications and possible combinations. When dealing with unusual lymphedema presentation as in the genitalia (Genital Lymphedema—GL), treatment choice becomes even more difficult. The authors aimed to present their targeted algorithm of single and combined treatment modalities for rare GL in order to face this paucity of information. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database since January 1983, and cases of GL that were managed in the authors’ department were selected. Only patients that were treated in the authors’ institution and presented a minimum follow-up of 3 months were admitted to the current study. Results: From January 1983 to July 2021, 19 patients with GL were recruited. All the patients were male, and their ages ranged from 21 to 73 years old (average: 52). Ten cases (52.6%) presented with ISL (International Society of Lymphology) stage I, five (26.3%) were stage II and four (21.1%) were stage III. GL was managed with conservative treatment (12 cases), LVA (LymphaticoVenous Anastomosis) (3) or surgical excision (4). In a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (range: 3 months—11 years), no major complications occurred, and all cases reached improvements in functional and quality of life terms. Conclusions: Contrary to the predominant thought of the necessity to avoid surgery in unusual lymphedema presentations such as GL, they can be managed using targeted multimodal approaches or by adapting well-known procedures in unusual ways to achieve control of disease progression and improve patients’ quality of life

no drain, no gain’’. Simultaneous seroma drainage and tissue expansion in pre-pectoral tissue expander-based breast reconstruction

Abstract Seromas represent the most frequent complication following immediate breast reconstruction surgery, in particular when acellular dermal matrix or synthetic meshes are used to add coverage to implants. Little information regarding breast seroma management is available in the literature. When seroma becomes clinically significant, current methods for its management consist of repeated needle aspiration. We report a fast, efficient, easy and riskless technique to perform serum aspiration in patients who underwent breast reconstruction with a tissue expander that allows simultaneous drainage and expansion of the implant at once. This procedure is safe, painless, does not need special supplies or additional costs and can be easily performed in ambulatory setting to manage breast seroma

Preliminary result with incisional negative pressure wound therapy and pectoralis major muscle flap for median sternotomy wound infection in a high-risk patient population

Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) represents a dangerous complication that can follow open-heart surgery with median sternotomy access. Muscle flaps, such as monolateral pectoralis major muscle flap (MPMF), represent the main choices for sternal wound coverage and infection control. Negative pressure incision management system has proven to be able to reduce the incidence of these wounds' complications. Prevena™ represents one of these incision management systems and we aimed to evaluate its benefits. A total of 78 patients with major risk factors that presented post-sternotomy DSWI following cardiac surgery was selected. Thrity patients were treated with MPMF and Prevena™ (study group). Control group consisted of 48 patients treated with MPMF and conventional wound dressings. During the follow-up period, 4 (13%) adverse events occurred in the study group, whereas 18 complications occurred (37·5%) in the control group. Surgical revision necessity and mean postoperative time spent in the intensive care unit were both higher in the control group. Our results evidenced Prevena™ system's ability in improving the outcome of DSWI surgical treatment with MPMF in a high-risk patient population

The breast cancer-related lymphedema multidisciplinary approach: Algorithm for conservative and multimodal surgical treatment

BackgroundMultiple surgical alternatives are available to treat breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) providing a variable spectrum of outcomes. This study aimed to present the breast cancer-related lymphedema multidisciplinary approach (B-LYMA) to systematically treat BCRL. MethodsSeventy-eight patients presenting with BCRL between 2017 and 2021 were included. The average age and BMI were 49.4 +/- 7.8 years and 28.1 +/- 3.5 kg/m(2), respectively. Forty patients had lymphedema ISL stage II (51.3%) and 38 had stage III (48.7%). The mean follow-up was 26.4 months. Treatment was selected according to the B-LYMA algorithm, which aims to combine physiologic and excisional procedures according to the preoperative evaluation of patients. All patients had pre- and postoperative complex decongestive therapy (CDT). ResultsStage II patients were treated with lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) (n = 18), vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) (n = 12), and combined DIEP flap and VLNT (n = 10). Stage III patients underwent combined suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and LVA (n = 36) or combined SAL and VLNT (n = 2). Circumferential reduction rates (CRR) were comparable between patients treated with LVA (56.5 +/- 8.4%), VLNT (54.4 +/- 10.2%), and combined VLNT-DIEP flap (56.5 +/- 3.9%) (p > .05). In comparison to LVA, VLNT, and combined VLNT-DIEP flap, combined SAL-LVA exhibited higher CRRs (85 +/- 10.5%, p < .001). The CRR for combined SAL-VLNT was 75 +/- 8.5%. One VLNT failed and minor complications occurred in the combined DIEP-VLNT group. ConclusionThe B-LYMA protocol directs the treatment of BCRL according to the lymphatic system's condition. In advanced stages where a single physiologic procedure is not sufficient, additional excisional surgery is implemented. Preoperative and postoperative CDT is mandatory to improve the outcomes

Electrochemotherapy: first objective quality assessment of online information on a rising low-invasive procedure, in a constantly aging society

Web development brought new scenarios in doctor-patient communication. Health professionals are no more the only vessel of medical knowledge and patients have new chan- nels to explore in search for medical information. Technol- ogy and interconnection permeate our daily life and Internet became a major seeking information tool for the patients [1]. The constant increase of online reports and lack of verifica- tion made the quality of the available information the main issu