763 research outputs found
Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials
A sample size justification is a vital part of any trial design. However, estimating the number of participants required to give a meaningful result is not always straightforward. A number of components are required to facilitate a suitable sample size calculation. In this paper, the steps for conducting sample size calculations for non-inferiority and equivalence trials are summarised. Practical advice and examples are provided that illustrate how to carry out the calculations by hand and using the app SampSize
Practical guide to sample size calculations: superiority trials
A sample size justification is a vital part of any investigation. However, estimating the number of participants required to give meaningful results is not always straightforward. A number of components are required to facilitate a suitable sample size calculation. In this paper, the steps for conducting sample size calculations for superiority trials are summarised. Practical advice and examples are provided illustrating how to carry out the calculations by hand and using the app SampSize
Practical guide to sample size calculations: an introduction
A sample size justification is a vital step when designing any trial. However, estimating the number of participants required to give a meaningful result is not always straightforward. A number of components are required to facilitate a suitable sample size calculation. In this paper, the general steps are summarised for conducting sample size calculations with practical advice and guidance on how to utilise the app SampSize
Recommended from our members
How can health economics be used in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials? A qualitative analysis
Introduction
Adaptive designs offer a flexible approach, allowing changes to a trial based on examinations of the data as it progresses. Adaptive clinical trials are becoming a popular choice, as the prudent use of finite research budgets and accurate decision-making are priorities for healthcare providers around the world. The methods of health economics, which aim to maximise the health gained for money spent, could be incorporated into the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials to make them more efficient. We aimed to understand the perspectives of stakeholders in health technology assessments to inform recommendations for the use of health economics in adaptive clinical trials.
Methods
A qualitative study explored the attitudes of key stakeholders—including researchers, decision-makers and members of the public—towards the use of health economics in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials. Data were collected using interviews and focus groups (29 participants). A framework analysis was used to identify themes in the transcripts.
Results
It was considered that answering the clinical research question should be the priority in a clinical trial, notwithstanding the importance of cost-effectiveness for decision-making. Concerns raised by participants included handling the volatile nature of cost data at interim analyses; implementing this approach in global trials; resourcing adaptive trials which are designed and adapted based on health economic outcomes; and training stakeholders in these methods so that they can be implemented and appropriately interpreted.
Conclusion
The use of health economics in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials has the potential to increase the efficiency of health technology assessments worldwide. Recommendations are made concerning the development of methods allowing the use of health economics in adaptive clinical trials, and suggestions are given to facilitate their implementation in practice
Calculation of confidence intervals for a finite population size
For any estimate of response, confidence intervals are important as they help quantify a plausible range of values for the population response. However, there may be instances in clinical research when the population size is finite, but we wish to take a sample from the population and make inference from this sample. Instances where you can have a fixed population size include when undertaking a clinical audit of patient records or in a clinical trial a researcher could be checking for transcription errors against patient notes. In this paper, we describe how confidence interval calculations can be calculated for a finite population. These confidence intervals are narrower than confidence intervals from population samples. For the extreme case of when a 100% sample from the population is taken, there is no error and the calculation is the population response. The methods in the paper are described using a case study from clinical data management
Can emergency medicine research benefit from adaptive design clinical trials?
Background: Adaptive design clinical trials use preplanned interim analyses to determine whether studies should be stopped or modified before recruitment is complete. Emergency medicine trials are well suited to these designs as many have a short time to primary outcome relative to the length of recruitment. We hypothesised that the majority of published emergency medicine trials have the potential to use a simple adaptive trial design.
Methods: We reviewed clinical trials published in three emergency medicine journals between January 2003 and December 2013. We determined the proportion that used an adaptive design as well as the proportion that could have used a simple adaptive design based on the time to primary outcome and length of recruitment.
Results: Only 19 of 188 trials included in the review were considered to have used an adaptive trial design. A total of 154/165 trials that were fixed in design had the potential to use an adaptive design.
Conclusions: Currently, there seems to be limited uptake in the use of adaptive trial designs in emergency medicine despite their potential benefits to save time and resources. Failing to take advantage of adaptive designs could be costly to patients and research. It is recommended that where practical and logistical considerations allow, adaptive designs should be used for all emergency medicine clinical trials
Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes
Background: A pilot study can be an important step in the assessment of an intervention by providing information to design the future definitive trial. Pilot studies can be used to estimate the recruitment and retention rates and population variance and to provide preliminary evidence of efficacy potential. However, estimation is poor because pilot studies are small, so sensitivity analyses for the main trial's sample size calculations should be undertaken. Methods: We demonstrate how to carry out easy-to-perform sensitivity analysis for designing trials based on pilot data using an example. Furthermore, we introduce rules of thumb for the size of the pilot study so that the overall sample size, for both pilot and main trials, is minimized. Results: The example illustrates how sample size estimates for the main trial can alter dramatically by plausibly varying assumptions. Required sample size for 90% power varied from 392 to 692 depending on assumptions. Some scenarios were not feasible based on the pilot study recruitment and retention rates. Conclusion: Pilot studies can be used to help design the main trial, but caution should be exercised. We recommend the use of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the design assumptions for a main trial
Anxiety Level Among Patients Admitted with Chest Pain in Tertiary Care Hospital
Introduction: Anxiety, as defined by Wilson-Barnett, is the fear of the unknown, disproportionate to the threat and related to the future. It is characterized by an individual’s inability to specify the source of the threat.  Chest pain can be a major source of stress and anxiety. These feelings are directly related to the invasive nature of the procedure and to uncertainties related to diagnosis. Chest pain and anxiety, relatives are also stressed and share feelings and uncertainties with the patients.Method: Quantitative cross-sectional study design was used to determine the anxiety level among patient with chest pain at tertiary care hospital. 56 patients with chest pain admitted at emergency department were selected as sample. Data was collected through the standardized well adopted 40 items questionnaires.Results: the results revealed that only (25) 47 % patients have low level of anxiety and majority (31) 53% have suffered from high level of anxiety. Further the demographical characteristics revealed that the gender of the participants was found 45 (80.4%) were male and 11 (19.6%) were female. Age of participants was found minimum 21 to highest 60, participant’s age group 21-30 years frequency was 6 (10.7%), moderately 12 (21.4%) participants were belonging to age group 31-40 years, majority 29 (51.8%) were fall in age group 41- 50 years and 9 (16.1%) were 51-60-year-old. Conclusions: It is apparent from our study that counseling before cardiac procedure unquestionably reduces the anxiety level of the patients. Other factors, such as providing beds and other physical facilities to the patients further reduce the level of anxiety. Keywords: anxiety, chest pain, emergency department, patients. DOI: 10.7176/JHMN/102-01 Publication date:September 30th 202
- …