27 research outputs found

    Effectiveness of dermal cleaning interventions for reducing firefighters' exposures to PAHs and genotoxins

    No full text
    Firefighters are exposed to carcinogenic and mutagenic combustion emissions, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Fire service and firefighter cancer advocacy groups recommend skin cleaning using wipes or washing with detergent and water after exposure to smoke, although these strategies have not been proven to reduce exposures to harmful combustion products like PAHs. This study assessed dermal decontamination methods to reduce PAH exposures by firefighters participating in live fire training scenarios. Study participants (n = 88) were randomly assigned to an intervention group (i.e., two types of commercial skin wipes, detergent and water, or a control group who did not use any skin decontamination). PAHs were measured in personal air (during the fire) and dermal wipe samples (before and after fire suppression, and after dermal decontamination). PAH metabolites and mutagenicity were measured in urine samples before and after fire suppression. Airborne PAH concentrations during the fire ranged between 200 and 3969 µg/m3 (mean= 759 µg/m3, SD = 685 µg/m3). Firefighters had higher total PAHs and high molecular weight PAHs on their skin after the fire compared to before (1.3- and 2.2-fold, respectively, p 2 pre-intervention vs. 0.38 ng/cm2 post-intervention, p < 0.01). However, fold changes in urinary PAH metabolites (i.e., pre- versus post-exposure levels) did not differ between any of the dermal decontamination methods or the control group. These data suggest that despite on-site attempts to remove PAHs from firefighters’ skin, the examined interventions did not reduce the internal dose of PAHs. Future work should investigate preventing initial exposure using other interventions, such as improved personal protective equipment.</p

    Tracking the History and Ecological Changes of Rising Double-Crested Cormorant Populations Using Pond Sediments from Islands in Eastern Lake Ontario

    No full text
    <div><p>In the Laurentian Great Lakes region, the double-crested cormorant (<i>Phalacrocorax auritus</i>) has seen a thousand-fold population increase in recent decades. These large colonies of birds now often conflict with socioeconomic interests, particularly due to perceived competition with fisheries and the destruction of terrestrial vegetation in nesting habitats. Here we use dated sediment cores from ponds on islands in eastern Lake Ontario that receive waste inputs from dense colonies of cormorants and ring-billed gulls (<i>Larus delawarensis</i>) to chronicle the population rise of these species and assess their long-term ecological impacts. Modern water chemistry sampling from these sites reveals drastically elevated nutrient and major ion concentrations compared to reference ponds not influenced by waterbirds. Geochemical tracers in dated sediment cores, particularly δ<sup>15</sup>N and chlorophyll-<i>a</i> concentrations, track waterbird influences over time. Fossil diatom assemblages were dominated by species tolerant of hyper-eutrophic and polluted systems, which is in marked contrast to assemblages in reference sites. In addition to establishing long-term ecological impacts, this multi-proxy paleoecological approach can be used to determine whether islands of concern have been long-term nesting sites or were only recently colonized by cormorant or ring-billed gull populations across the Great Lakes, facilitating informed management decisions about controversial culling programs.</p></div

    Water chemistry for impacted and reference sites.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Specific conductivity (μS/cm) in high-impact ponds in black and hashed (ponds EB and PGN, respectively), the low-impact pond (FD1) in grey, and the no-impact pond (MD2) in white. Major cations and anions are listed in the inset by decreasing concentration. (B) Major nutrients in three study ponds, including total unfiltered nitrogen (TN) concentrations (mg/L) and total unfiltered phosphorus (TP) concentrations (μg/L).</p

    Cormorant impact and morphological characteristics of study ponds.

    No full text
    <p>Pond abbreviations are as follows: East Brother (EB), Pigeon (PGN), False Duck Pond 1 (FD1), and Main Duck Pond 2 (MD2). The arrival of cormorants to East Brother and False Duck is based on data from D.V.C. Weseloh (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0134167#pone.0134167.s002" target="_blank">S1 Table</a>) and based on data from [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0134167#pone.0134167.ref017" target="_blank">17</a>] for PGN. Numbers for nests, as well as pond diameter and depth, are estimates made in the field at the time of sampling. Details of water chemistry sampling methods and dates are provided in the materials and methods section.</p><p>Cormorant impact and morphological characteristics of study ponds.</p

    A map of eastern Lake Ontario near Kingston, ON.

    No full text
    <p>Study ponds (with name and impact level) are on East Brother Island (EB, high-impact), Pigeon Island (PGN, high-impact), False Duck Island (FD1, low-impact), and Main Duck Island (MD2, no-impact).</p

    Subfossil diatom assemblages and geochemical tracers from sediment cores.

    No full text
    <p>Data are shown for the high-impact ponds on (A) East Brother Island (EB) and (B) Pigeon Island (PGN), as well as from the reference sites on (C) False Duck Island (FD1) and (D) Main Duck Island (MD2). The cyst to diatom ratio (C:D), sedimentary δ<sup>15</sup>N (‰) and spectrally-inferred sedimentary chlorophyll-<i>a</i> (chl-<i>a</i>) concentrations (mg/g) are given to the right of each stratigraphy. All profiles are presented on the same scales, except the C:D ratio for PGN. Grey boxes at the bottom of each core indicate sediment intervals in which diatom remains were too sparse to be enumerated.</p

    A comparison of the effect of CdCl2 and MgCl2 processing on the transport properties of n-CdS/p-CdTe solar cells and a simple approach to determine their back contact barrier height

    No full text
    <p>Data are presented as means ± SD. Sample sizes are indicated for each species (muscle, organ tissues). Monthly fish consumption limits (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) are indicated for MeHg. The consumption limits are 12 meals/month (59–78 ppb), 8 meals/month (78–120 ppb) and 4 meals/month (120–230 ppb).</p

    Participant characteristics (N = 71) of Kasabonika and Wapekeka First Nations based on wild food consumption frequency.

    No full text
    <p>WF1 (n = 28; ≤1 meal per month), WF2 (n = 22; <1 meal per week), and WF3 (n = 21; ≥1 meal per week). Data are presented as means (±SD) where appropriate.</p
    corecore