Translate One, Analyze Many: Leveraging the Microsoft Intermediate Language and Source Code Transformation for Model Checking

AbstractIn this paper we present a source transformation-based framework to support model checking of source code written with languages belonging to Microsoft's .NET platform. The framework includes a set of source transformation rules to guide the transformation, tools to support assertion checking, as well as a tool for the automation of deadlock detection. The framework results in both executable and formally verifiable artifacts. We provide details of the tools in the framework, and evaluate the framework on a few small case studies

Combining Model Checking and Discrete-Event Supervisor Synthesis

We present an approach to facilitate the design of provably correct concurrent systems by recasting recent work that uses discrete-event supervisor synthesis to automatically generate concurrency control code in Promela and combine it with model checking in Spin. This approach consists of the possibly repeated execution of three steps: manual preparation, automatic synthesis, and semi-automatic analysis. Given a concurrent Promela program C devoid of any concurrency control and an informal specification E_in , the preparation step is assumed to yield a formal specification E of the allowed system behaviours and two versions of C: C_e to identify the specification-relevant events in C and enable supervisor synthesis, and C_e,a to introduce “checkable redundancy” and used during the analysis step to locate bugs in: the specification formalization E, the event markup in C_e, or the implementation of the synthesis. The result is supervised Promela code C_sup that is more likely to be correct with respect to E and E_in. The approach is illustrated with an example. A prototype tool implementing the approach is described

A survey of self-management in dynamic software architecture specifications

As dynamic software architecture use becomes more widespread, a variety of formal specification languages have been developed to gain a better understanding of the foundations of this type of software evolutionary change. In this paper we survey 14 formal specification approaches based on graphs, process algebras, logic, and other formalisms. Our survey will evaluate the ability of each approach to specify self-managing systems as well as the ability to address issues regarding expressiveness and scalability. Based on the results of our survey we will provide recommendations on future directions for improving the specification of dynamic software architectures, specifically self-managed architectures