7 research outputs found

    Valuing the cost of improving chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine

    No full text
    Background: The phased withdrawal of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is central to the polio ‘end-game’ strategy. Methods: We analyzed the cost implications in Chile of a switch from the vaccination scheme consisting of a pentavalent vaccine with whole-cell pertussis component (wP) plus IPV/OPV vaccines to a scheme with a hexavalent vaccine with acellular pertussis component (aP) and IPV (Hexaxim®) from a societal perspective. Cost data were collected from a variety of sources including national estimates and previous vaccine studies. All costs were expressed in 2017 prices (US1.00= 1.00=Ch 666.26). Results: The overall costs associated with the vaccination scheme (4 doses of pentavalent vaccine plus 1 dose IPV and 3 doses OPV) from a societal perspective was estimated to be US12.70million,ofwhichUS 12.70 million, of which US 8.84 million were associated with the management of adverse events related to wP. In comparison, the cost associated with the 4-dose scheme with a hexavalent vaccine (based upon the PAHO reference price) was US19.76million.ThecostofswitchingtothehexavalentvaccinewouldbeanadditionalUS 19.76 million. The cost of switching to the hexavalent vaccine would be an additional US 6.45 million. Overall, depending on the scenario, the costs of switching to the hexavalent scheme would range from an additional US2.62milliontoUS 2.62 million to US 6.45 million compared with the current vaccination scheme. Conclusions: The switch to the hexavalent vaccine schedule in Chile would lead to additional acquisition costs, which would be partially offset by improved logistics, and a reduction in adverse events associated with the current vaccines

    Economic impact of dengue in Mexico considering reported cases for 2012 to 2016.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND:Given that dengue disease is growing and may progress to dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), data on economic cost and disease burden are important. However, data for Mexico are limited. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:Burden of dengue fever (DF) and DHF in Mexico was assessed using official databases for epidemiological information, disabilities weights from Shepard et al, the reported number of cases and deaths, and costs. Overall costs of dengue were summed from direct medical costs to the health system, cost of dengue to the patient (out-of-pocket expenses [medical and non-medical], indirect costs [loss of earnings, patient and/or caregiver]), and other government expenditures on prevention/surveillance. The first three components, calculated as costs per case by a micro-costing approach (PAATI; program, actions, activities, tasks, inputs), were scaled up to overall cost using epidemiology data from official databases. PAATI was used to calculate cost of vector control and prevention, education, and epidemiological surveillance, based on an expert consensus and normative construction of an ideal scenario. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for Mexico in 2016 were calculated to be 2283.46 (1.87 per 100,000 inhabitants). Overall economic impact of dengue in Mexico for 2012 was US144million,ofwhichUS144 million, of which US44 million corresponded to direct medical costs and US5milliontothecostsfromthepatientsperspective.Theestimatedcostofprevention/surveillancewascalculatedwithinformationprovidedbyfederalgovernmenttobeUS5 million to the costs from the patient's perspective. The estimated cost of prevention/surveillance was calculated with information provided by federal government to be US95 million. The overall economic impact of DF and DHF showed an increase in 2013 to US161millionandadecreasetoUS161 million and a decrease to US133, US131andUS131 and US130 million in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:The medical and economic impact of dengue were in agreement with other international studies, and highlight the need to include governmental expenditure for prevention/surveillance in overall cost analyses given the high economic impact of these, increasing the necessity to evaluate its effectiveness
    corecore