Figure 7.

ROC curves and AUC values for (A) Ancash, (B) Ayacucho, (C) Cusco, (D) L. tacnae and (E) L. walkeri

Figure 8.

Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of the holotype of Liolaemus chavin sp. n. (C) Type locality

Figure 9.

Lateral (A), dorsal (B), and ventral (C) views of the holotype of Liolaemus pachacutec sp. n.. (D) Habitat of L. pachacute

Figure 6

Predicted area and known geographic distribution (A) used to develop distributional models of Ancash (B), Ayacucho (C), Cusco (D), L. tacnae (E), and L. walkeri (F)

Figure 5.

First and second principal components (PC) and correspondence axes (CA) of morphometric (A) and meristic (B) data of Ancash, Ayacucho, Cusco, L. tacnae and L. walkeri respectively

SupplementaryFile2

Examined museum specimens and locality data from L. alticolor, L. chavin, L. incaicus, L. pachacutec, L. walkeri and L. wari

Figure 3.

Ventral view showing the color patterns of the belly and tail: (A) Ancash, (B) Ayacucho, (C) Cusco, (D) L. tacnae, and (E) L. walkeri

Figure 1.

Concatenated maximum likelihood (-Log L = 8452.31415) tree based on cyt-b and 12S haplotypes of focal taxa (Ancash, Ayacucho Cusco) and species assigned to the alticolor group and outgroups. Bootstrap ≥ 70 (*) and posterior probabilities values are shown above and below branches respectively

Figure 2.

Detailed view of the cloaca region showing absence (A, D) or presence (B, C, E) of precloacal pores: (A) Ancash, (B) Ayacucho, (C) Cusco, (D) L. tacnae, and (E) L. walkeri

Figure 4.

Lateral view showing the color patterns of (A) Ayacucho, (B) Cusco, and (C) L. walkeri