Recognition of Imipenem and Meropenem by the RND-Transporter MexB Studied by Computer Simulations

Basic understanding of the means by which multidrug efflux systems can efficiently recognize and transport drugs constitutes a fundamental step toward development of compounds able to tackle the continuous outbreak of new bacterial strains resistant to traditional antibiotics. We applied a series of computational techniques, from molecular docking to molecular dynamics simulations and free energy estimate methods, to determine the differences in the binding properties of imipenem and meropenem, two potent antibiotics of the carbapenem family, to MexB, the RND transporter of the major efflux system of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. We identified and characterized two affinity sites in the periplasmic domain of the transporter, sharing strong similarities with the distal and proximal binding pockets identified in AcrB, the homologue of MexB in <i>Escherichia coli</i>. According to our results, meropenem has a higher affinity to the distal binding pocket than imipenem while both compounds are weakly bound to the proximal pocket. This different behavior is mainly due to the hydration properties of the nonpharmacophore part of the two compounds, being that of imipenem less bulky and hydrophobic. Our data provide for the first time a rationale at molecular level for the experimental evidence indicating meropenem as a compound strongly affected by MexB contrary to imipenem, which is apparently poorly transported by the same pump

Molecular Interactions of Cephalosporins with the Deep Binding Pocket of the RND Transporter AcrB

The drug/proton antiporter AcrB, part of the major efflux pump AcrABZ-TolC in Escherichia coli, is characterized by its impressive ability to transport chemically diverse compounds, conferring a multidrug resistance phenotype. However, the molecular features differentiating between good and poor substrates of the pump have yet to be identified. In this work, we combined molecular docking with molecular dynamics simulations to study the interactions between AcrB and two representative cephalosporins, cefepime and ceftazidime (a good and poor substrate of AcrB, respectively). Our analysis revealed different binding preferences of the two compounds toward the subsites of the large deep binding pocket of AcrB. Cefepime, although less hydrophobic than ceftazidime, showed a higher affinity than ceftazidime for the so-called hydrophobic trap, a region known for binding inhibitors and substrates. This supports the hypothesis that surface complementarity between the molecule and AcrB, more than the intrinsic hydrophobicity of the antibiotic, is a feature required for the interaction within this region. Oppositely, the preference of ceftazidime for binding outside the hydrophobic trap might not be optimal for triggering allosteric conformational changes needed to the transporter to accomplish its function. Altogether, our findings could provide valuable information for the design of new antibiotics less susceptible to the efflux mechanism