Introduction to effective Lagrangians for QCD

A brief introduction to the effective Lagrangian treatment of QCD (in the sense of using fields representing physical particles rather than quarks and gluons) will be given. The historical evolution of the subject will be discussed. Some background material related to a recent model for Gamma Ray Bursters will be given. Finally, some recent work on low energy strong interactions will be mentioned.Comment: 12 pages, 2 figures, talk at "Compact stars in the QCD phase diagram", Copenhagen, Aug. 15-18, 200

Remark on the Potential Function of the Linear Sigma Model

It is shown that the potential functions for the ordinary linear sigma model can be divided into two topographically different types depending on whether the quantity $R\equiv(m_\sigma/m_\pi)^2$ is greater than or less than nine. Since the Wigner-Weyl mode (R=1) and the Nambu-Goldstone mode ($R=\infty$ belong to different regions, we speculate that this classification may provide a generalization to the broken symmetry situation, which could be convenient for roughly characterizing different possible applications of the model. It is noted that a more complicated potential does not so much change this picture as add different new regions.Comment: 26 pages, 11 figures (gzipped

Toy Model for Breaking Super Gauge Theories at the Effective Lagrangian Level

We propose a toy model to illustrate how the effective Lagrangian for super QCD might go over to the one for ordinary QCD by a mechanism whereby the gluinos and squarks in the fundamental theory decouple below a given supersymmetry breaking scale $m$. The implementation of this approach involves a suitable choice of possible supersymmetry breaking terms. An amusing feature of the model is the emergence of the ordinary QCD degrees of freedom which were hidden in the auxiliary fields of the supersymmetric effective Lagrangian.Comment: 21 pages (ReVTeX), 1 PostScript Figur

Neutrinos with velocities greater than c ?

A possible explanation of the results of the OPERA experiment is presented. Assuming that the usual value of c should be interpreted as the velocity of light in dark matter, we call the "true" velocity of light in vacuum, $c_t$. Then the OPERA neutrinos can be faster than c but slower than $c_t$. We also discuss the relationship between $c_t$ and neutrino masses.Comment: 5 pages, 1 figure, additional references adde

Absolute neutrino masses

We discuss the possibility of using experiments timing the propagation of neutrino beams over large distances to help determine the absolute masses of the three neutrinos.Comment: 3 pages, 2 figure

Nonperturbative Results for Yang-Mills Theories

Some non perturbative aspects of the pure SU(3) Yang-Mills theory are investigated assuming a specific form of the beta function, based on a recent modification by Ryttov and Sannino of the known one for supersymmetric gauge theories. The characteristic feature is a pole at a particular value of the coupling constant, g. First it is noted, using dimensional analysis, that physical quantities behave smoothly as one travels from one side of the pole to the other. Then it is argued that the form of the integrated beta function g(m), where m is the mass scale, determines the mass gap of the theory. Assuming the usual QCD value one finds it to be 1.67 GeV, which is in surprisingly good agreement with a quenched lattice calculation. A similar calculation is made for the supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory where the corresponding beta function is considered to be exact.Comment: RevTeX, 2colmuns, 6 pages and 7 figure

Radiative Decays involving a0(980) and f0(980) in the Vector Meson Dominance Model

We summarize some features of the vector meson dominance model which was recently proposed for studying radiative decays involving the scalar mesons. Using the experimental values of $\Gamma(a_0 \to \gamma\gamma)$, $\Gamma(f_0 \to \gamma\gamma)$ and $\Gamma(\phi \to a_0 \gamma)$ as inputs, we show that the model predicts a large hierarchy between $\Gamma(a_0 \to \omega \gamma)$ and $\Gamma(a_0 \to \rho \gamma)$ as well as between $\Gamma(f_0 \to \omega \gamma)$ and $\Gamma(f_0 \to \rho \gamma)$.Comment: 7pages, Talk given by M. Harada at International Symposium on Hadron Spectroscopy, Chiral Symmetry and Relativistic Description of Bound Systems, February 24-26, 2003, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japa