CAR T Cell Therapy of Non-hematopoietic Malignancies: Detours on the Road to Clinical Success

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells represent a breakthrough in personalized medicine. In this strategy, a patient's own T lymphocytes are genetically reprogrammed to encode a synthetic receptor that binds a tumor antigen, allowing T cells to recognize and kill antigen-expressing cancer cells. As a result of complete and durable responses in individuals who are refractory to standard of care therapy, CAR T cells directed against the CD19 protein have been granted United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as a therapy for treatment of pediatric and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Human trials of CAR T cells targeting CD19 or B cell maturation antigen in multiple myeloma have also reported early successes. However, a clear and consistently reproducible demonstration of the clinical efficacy of CAR T cells in the setting of solid tumors has not been reported to date. Here, we review the history and status of CAR T cell therapy for solid tumors, potential T cell-intrinsic determinants of response and resistance as well as extrinsic obstacles to the success of this approach for much more prevalent non-hematopoietic malignancies. In addition, we summarize recent strategies and innovations that aim to augment the potency of CAR T cells in the face of multiple immunosuppressive barriers operative within the solid tumor microenvironment. Advances in the field of CAR T cell biology over the coming years in the areas of safety, reliability and efficacy against non-hematopoietic cancers will ultimately determine how transformative adoptive T cell therapy will be in the broader battle against cancer

Divergent roles for antigenic drive in the aetiology of primary versus dasatinib-associated CD8(+) TCR-Vβ(+) expansions

CD8(+) T-cell expansions are the primary manifestation of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL), which is frequently accompanied by neutropenia and rheumatoid arthritis, and also occur as a secondary phenomenon in leukemia patients treated with dasatinib, notably in association with various drug-induced side-effects. However, the mechanisms that underlie the genesis and maintenance of expanded CD8(+) T-cell receptor (TCR)-V beta(+) populations in these patient groups have yet to be fully defined. In this study, we performed a comprehensive phenotypic and clonotypic assessment of expanded (TCR-V beta(+)) and residual (TCR-V beta(-)) CD8(+) T-cell populations in T-LGLL and dasatinib-treated chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients. The dominant CD8(+) TCR-V beta(+) expansions in T-LGLL patients were largely monoclonal and highly differentiated, whereas the dominant CD8(+) TCR-V beta(+) expansions in dasatinib-treated CML patients were oligoclonal or polyclonal, and displayed a broad range of memory phenotypes. These contrasting features suggest divergent roles for antigenic drive in the immunopathogenesis of primary versus dasatinib-associated CD8(+) TCR-V beta(+) expansions.Peer reviewe

Increased Urinary Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Renal Transplant Patients with Diabetes

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is expressed in the kidney and may be a renoprotective enzyme, since it converts angiotensin (Ang) II to Ang-(1-7). ACE2 has been detected in urine from patients with chronic kidney disease. We measured urinary ACE2 activity and protein levels in renal transplant patients (age 54 yrs, 65% male, 38% diabetes, n = 100) and healthy controls (age 45 yrs, 26% male, n = 50), and determined factors associated with elevated urinary ACE2 in the patients. Urine from transplant subjects was also assayed for ACE mRNA and protein. No subjects were taking inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. Urinary ACE2 levels were significantly higher in transplant patients compared to controls (p = 0.003 for ACE2 activity, and p≤0.001 for ACE2 protein by ELISA or western analysis). Transplant patients with diabetes mellitus had significantly increased urinary ACE2 activity and protein levels compared to non-diabetics (p<0.001), while ACE2 mRNA levels did not differ. Urinary ACE activity and protein were significantly increased in diabetic transplant subjects, while ACE mRNA levels did not differ from non-diabetic subjects. After adjusting for confounding variables, diabetes was significantly associated with urinary ACE2 activity (p = 0.003) and protein levels (p<0.001), while female gender was associated with urinary mRNA levels for both ACE2 and ACE. These data indicate that urinary ACE2 is increased in renal transplant recipients with diabetes, possibly due to increased shedding from tubular cells. Urinary ACE2 could be a marker of renal renin-angiotensin system activation in these patients

STAT3 Role in T-Cell Memory Formation

Along with the clinical success of immuno-oncology drugs and cellular therapies, T-cell biology has attracted considerable attention in the immunology community. Long-term immunity, traditionally analyzed in the context of infection, is increasingly studied in cancer. Many signaling pathways, transcription factors, and metabolic regulators have been shown to participate in the formation of memory T cells. There is increasing evidence that the signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) signaling pathway is crucial for the formation of long-term T-cell immunity capable of efficient recall responses. In this review, we summarize what is currently known about STAT3 role in the context of memory T-cell formation and antitumor immunity

CAR-T and ibrutinib vs CLL: Sequential or simultaneous?

In this issue of Blood, Gauthier and colleagues present the results of a pilot study evaluating the safety and feasibility of administrating ibrutinib concurrently with CD3zeta, 4-1BB-signaling anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).1 Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment was performed on bone marrow (BM) at an early time point (4 weeks) following CAR T-cell infusion. The study enrolled 19 CLL patients, one of whom died 4 days after infusion from a presumed ibrutinib-related cardiac arrhythmia during grade 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). At the 4-week time point, 15 of the remaining 18 patients responded, with 4 patients achieving a complete response. Remarkably, 11 patients had undetectable BM MRD as measured by IGH sequencing. One-year progression-free survival (PFS) of the 18 evaluable patients was 38%. The authors compared these results to 19 CLL patients who were previously treated with a very similar regimen but without concurrent ibrutinib2 and found that severity of CRS was lower with concomitant ibrutinib, but PFS was unchanged

Engineered T Cell Therapies from a Drug Development Viewpoint

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Recent advances in cellular therapy have demonstrated that this platform has the potential to give patients with certain cancers a second chance at life. Unlike chemical compounds and proteins, cells are living, self-replicating drugs that can be engineered to possess exquisite specificity. For example, T cells can be genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), endowing them with the capacity to recognize and kill tumor cells and form a memory pool that is ready to strike back against persisting malignant cells. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART19s) have demonstrated a remarkable degree of clinical efficacy for certain malignancies. The process of developing CART19 essentially follows the conventional “one gene, one drug, one disease” paradigm derived from Paul Ehrlich’s “magic bullet” concept. With major players within the pharmaceutical industry joining forces to commercialize this new category of “living drugs,” it is useful to use CART19 as an example to examine the similarities and differences in its development, compared with that of a conventional drug. In this way, we can assimilate existing knowledge and identify the most effective approach for advancing similar strategies. This article reviews the use of biomarker-based assays to guide the optimization of CAR constructs, preclinical studies, and the evaluation of clinical efficacy; adverse effects (AEs); and CART19 cellular kinetics. Advanced technologies and computational tools that enable the discovery of optimal targets, novel CAR binding domains, and biomarkers predicting clinical response and AEs are also discussed. We believe that the success of CART19 will lead to the development of other engineered T cell therapies in the same manner that the discovery of arsphenamine initiated the era of synthetic pharmaceuticals. Keywords: Engineered T cell therapies, Chimeric antigen receptor, Drug development process, Biomarkers, CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor, Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell

Mechanisms of resistance to CAR T cell therapies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cells have demonstrated remarkable success in the treatment of B cell malignancies. FDA approval of these therapies represents a watershed moment in the development of therapies for cancer. Despite the successes of the last decade, many patients will unfortunately not experience durable responses to CAR therapy. Emerging research has shed light on the biology responsible for these failures, and further highlighted the hurdles to broader success. Here, we review the recent research identifying how interactions between cancer cells and engineered immune cells result in resistance to CAR therapies