239 research outputs found
Abdominal packing for surgically uncontrollable hemorrhage in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
AbstractEmergency surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms is accompanied with massive blood loss and is correlated with high incidences of coagulopathy. Following established results with abdominal packing to control hepatic hemorrhage, we present this technique for uncontrollable hemorrhage in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The experience with this technique in 46 patients is described. (J Vasc Surg 2001;33:195-6.
Tips and techniques for optimal stent graft placement in angulated aneurysm necks
An increasing number of patients with severely angulated abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) necks are being treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Optimal preprocedural planning and investigation of the AAA morphology is essential to achieve a successful EVAR in these patients. In this article, we discuss specific problems that can be encountered during preoperative planning in relation to periprocedural stent graft deployment in patients with angulated AAA necks and offer potential solutions for these problems
Total Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch:Initial Experience in the Netherlands
Background. We report procedural and early results in the Netherlands of the Relay Branch device (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, FL) for total endovascular repair of the aortic arch. Methods. Between 2014 and 2018, all consecutive patients who received the Aortic Relay double-branched stent graft in the Netherlands were included in a multicenter, retrospective registry. Results. The Relay Branch device was used in 11 patients to treat saccular (n = 4), fusiform (n = 5), or false aneurysms (n = 2) in the aortic arch. Patients were deemed unfit or extreme high-risk for open (redo) surgery. The brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery were branched using a retrograde approach in all cases. Additional surgical left subclavian artery revascularization was performed in 8 patients. The main device and the branches were successfully introduced, positioned, and deployed with complete exclusion of the aortic pathology in all patients (100% technical success). There was no retrograde type A dissection or conversion to open surgery. Two procedure-related deaths occurred, both caused by perioperative or postoperative strokes. There were 2 minor strokes with full recovery. One patient recovered from transient paraplegia after spinal fluid drainage. No permanent paraplegia was observed. Follow-up imaging showed persistent adequate exclusion of aortic arch pathology. Mean follow-up was 17 months (range, 3-42 months). Conclusions. Total endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch device is technically feasible and effective in excluding aortic arch pathology. The observed stroke rate in the initial experience, however, was considerable. Although appealing, this new less-invasive technique should be carefully introduced and its progress thoroughly evaluated. (C) 2020 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeon
Variation in Surgical Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With Small Aortic Diameters in the Netherlands
Objective: To evaluate reasons to deviate from aneurysm diameter thresholds, and focus on the difference in how Dutch vascular surgical units (VSUs)
perceive their deviation and their actual deviation.
Background: Guidelines recommend surgical treatment for asymptomatic
abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with a diameter of at least 55 mm for
men and 50 mm for women. We evaluate reasons to deviate from these
guidelines, and focus on the difference in how Dutch vascular surgical units
(VSUs) perceive their deviation and their actual deviation.
Methods: All patients undergoing elective AAA repair between 2013 and
2016 registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) were
included. Surgery at diameters of <55 mm for men and <50 mm for women
were considered guideline deviations. National deviation and hospital variation in deviation were evaluated over time. Questionnaires were distributed
among all Dutch VSUs, inquiring for acceptable reasons for guideline
deviation. VSUs were asked to estimate the guideline deviation percentage
in their hospital which was then compared with their DSAA percentage.
Results: In all, 9039 patients were included. In 15%, we found guideline
deviation, varying from 2% to 40% between VSUs. Over time, 21 VSUs were
identified with a lower percentage of deviation than the national mean each
year and 8 VSUs with a higher percentage. 44/60 VSUs completed the
questionnaire. Most commonly reported reasons to deviate were concomitant
large iliac diameter (91%) and saccular aneurysm (82%). The majority of the
VSUs (77%) estimated their guideline deviation to be <5%. Eleven VSUs
(25%) estimated their deviation concordant with their DSAA percentage, but
75% of VSUs underestimated their deviation.
Conclusions: Dutch VSUs regularly deviate from the guidelines regarding
aneurysm diameter, with variation between VSUs. Consensus exists amongst
VSUs on acceptable reasons for guideline deviations; however, the majority
underestimates their actual deviation percentage
A ruptured aneurysm after stent graft puncture during computed tomography-guided thrombin injection
Type II endoleaks occur in 5% to 10% of patients who are treated by endovascular aneurysm repair. A persistent type II endoleak combined with documented aneurysm expansion is generally considered an indication for intervention. Thrombin injection directly into the aneurysm sac is described as a safe and efficient treatment option. We present a patient with a ruptured aneurysm caused by a puncture of the stent graft during computed tomography-guided thrombin injection. This case highlights a possible harmful complication of thrombin injection and emphasizes the need for caution while performing such a procedure
Utilizing numerical simulations to prevent stent graft kinking during thoracic endovascular aortic repair
Numerical simulations of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) may be implemented in the preoperative workflow if credible and reliable. We present the application of a TEVAR simulation methodology to an 82-year-old woman with a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer in the left hemiarch, that underwent a left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypass and consequent TEVAR in zone 2. During the intervention, kinking of the distal thoracic stent graft occurred and the simulation was able to reproduce this event. This report highlights the potential and reliability of TEVAR simulations to predict perioperative adverse events and short-term postoperative technical results. (J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2023;9:101269.
Radiation Awareness for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Hybrid Operating Room: An Instant Operator Risk Chart for Daily Practice
Introduction: While the operator radiation dose rates are correlated to patient radiation dose rates, discrepancies may exist in the effect size of each individual radiation dose predictors. An operator dose rate prediction model was developed, compared with the patient dose rate prediction model, and converted to an instant operator risk chart. Materials and Methods: The radiation dose rates (DRoperator for the operator and DRpatient for the patient) from 12,865 abdomen X-ray acquisitions were selected from 50 unique patients undergoing standard or complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in the hybrid operating room with a fixed C-arm. The radiation dose rates were analyzed using a log-linear multivariable mixed model (with the patient as the random effect) and incorporated varying (patient and C-arm) radiation dose predictors combined with the vascular access site. The operator dose rate models were used to predict the expected radiation exposure duration until an operator may be at risk to reach the 20 mSv year dose limit. The dose rate prediction models were translated into an instant operator radiation risk chart. Results: In the multivariate patient and operator fluoroscopy dose rate models, lower DRoperator than DRpatient effect size was found for radiation protocol (2.06 for patient vs 1.4 for operator changing from low to medium protocol) and C-arm angulation. Comparable effect sizes for both DRoperator and DRpatient were found for body mass index (1.25 for patient and 1.27 for the operator) and irradiated field. A higher effect size for the DRoperator than DRpatient was found for C-arm rotation (1.24 for the patient vs 1.69 for the operator) and exchanging from femoral access site to brachial access (1.05 for patient vs 2.5 for the operator). Operators may reach their yearly 20 mSv year dose limit after 941 minutes from the femoral access vs 358 minutes of digital subtraction angiography radiation from the brachial access. Conclusion: The operator dose rates were correlated to patient dose rate; however, C-arm angulation and changing from femoral to brachial vascular access site may disproportionally increase the operator radiation risk compared with the patient radiation risk. An instant risk chart may improve operator dose awareness during EVAR
Ювілей Михайла Миколайовича Тарана
18 жовтня 2008 р. виповнилося 60 років відомому українському вченому-мінералогу, знаному в світі фахівцю в галузі фізики мінералів, доктору геолого-мінералогічних наук Михайлові Миколайовичу Тарану
Mid-Term Results and Morphological Neck Changes After EVAR in Patients With Severe Proximal Neck Angulation
- …