Bensonetal.CanisHybridZoneBodyLengthData

Body length data for captured wolves, coyotes, hybrids. BL = body length in cm. EW = eastern wolf, gray = gray wolf

Bensonetal.CanisHybridZoneBodyMassData

Body Mass data for captured wolves, coyotes, hybrids. EW = eastern wolf, Gray = gray wolf

Appendix G. Additional cause-specific mortality results.

Additional cause-specific mortality results

Bensonetal.CanisHybridZoneLandscapeData

Ancestry and environmental data associated with resident wolves, coyotes, and hybrids tracked in and adjacent to APP, 2004-201

Appendix D. Additional overall survival results.

Additional overall survival results

Appendix C. Sample sizes for categorical variables.

Sample sizes for categorical variables

Results of mixed-effect resource selection models for mountain lions at mule deer feeding sites in and adjacent to Los Angeles in southern California, 2002–2015.

<p>Shown are β coefficients and 95% and 90% confidence intervals. Significant and marginally significant fixed effects, based on 95% and 90% confidence intervals, respectively, shown in bold. Note that for classification-based variables (elevation and slope) positive β indicate selection, negative β indicate avoidance. All other variables are distance-based, so negative β indicate selection, positive β indicate avoidance. Also shown are the mean values at mule deer feeding sites used by mountain lions.</p

Comparison of model fit between models of varying complexity.

<p>Shown are Akaike’s Information Criteria (AIC) and differences between best model and competing models (ΔAIC).</p

Relative probability of use of mule deer feeding sites by female mountain lions in the Santa Monica Mountains and Simi Hills, southern California, 2002–2015.

<p>Relative probability of use predicted by generalized linear mixed model of resource selection.</p

Appendix A. Supporting methods.

Supporting methods