16 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Aspects of high hydrostatic pressure food processing: Perspectives on technology and food safety
The last two decades saw a steady increase of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) used for treatment of foods. Although the science of biomaterials exposed to high pressure started more than a century ago, there still seem to be a number of unanswered questions regarding safety of foods processed using HHP. This review gives an overview on historical development and fundamental aspects of HHP, as well as on potential risks associated with HHP food applications based on available literature. Beside the combination of pressure and temperature, as major factors impacting inactivation of vegetative bacterial cells, bacterial endospores, viruses, and parasites, factors, such as food matrix, water content, presence of dissolved substances, and pH value, also have significant influence on their inactivation by pressure. As a result, pressure treatment of foods should be considered for specific food groups and in accordance with their specific chemical and physical properties. The pressure necessary for inactivation of viruses is in many instances slightly lower than that for vegetative bacterial cells; however, data for food relevant human virus types are missing due to the lack of methods for determining their infectivity. Parasites can be inactivated by comparatively lower pressure than vegetative bacterial cells. The degrees to which chemical reactions progress under pressure treatments are different to those of conventional thermal processes, for example, HHP leads to lower amounts of acrylamide and furan. Additionally, the formation of new unknown or unexpected substances has not yet been observed. To date, no safety-relevant chemical changes have been described for foods treated by HHP. Based on existing sensitization to non-HHP-treated food, the allergenic potential of HHP-treated food is more likely to be equivalent to untreated food. Initial findings on changes in packaging materials under HHP have not yet been adequately supported by scientific data
Sustainable Consumerism via Context-Aware Shopping
ISSN:1947-3532ISSN:1947-354
Characterization of estrogen and androgen activity of food contact materials by different in vitro bioassays (YES, YAS, ERα and AR CALUX) and chromatographic analysis (GC-MS, HPLC-MS).
Endocrine active substances (EAS) show structural similarities to natural hormones and are suspected to affect the human endocrine system by inducing hormone dependent effects. Recent studies with in vitro tests suggest that EAS can leach from packaging into food and may therefore pose a risk to human health. Sample migrates from food contact materials were tested for estrogen and androgen agonists and antagonists with different commonly used in vitro tests. Additionally, chemical trace analysis by GC-MS and HPLC-MS was used to identify potential hormone active substances in sample migrates. A GC-MS method to screen migrates for 29 known or potential endocrine active substances was established and validated. Samples were migrated according to EC 10/2011, concentrated by solid phase extraction and tested with estrogen and androgen responsive reporter gene assays based on yeast cells (YES and YAS) or human osteoblast cells (ERα and AR CALUX). A high level of agreement between the different bioassays could be observed by screening for estrogen agonists. Four out of 18 samples tested showed an estrogen activity in a similar range in both, YES and ERα CALUX. Two more samples tested positive in ERα CALUX due to the lower limits of detection in this assay. Androgen agonists could not be detected in any of the tested samples, neither with YAS nor with AR CALUX. When testing for antagonists, significant differences between yeast and human cell-based bioassays were noticed. Using YES and YAS many samples showed a strong antagonistic activity which was not observed using human cell-based CALUX assays. By GC-MS, some known or supposed EAS were identified in sample migrates that showed a biological activity in the in vitro tests. However, no firm conclusions about the sources of the observed hormone activity could be obtained from the chemical results
Estrogen and antiestrogen activities of identified substances in the YES and ER CALUX.
<p>CAS#… Chemical Abstracts Service Number.</p>a<p>… inhibition of human U2-OS osteosarcoma cell growth at higher concentrations.</p>b<p>… inhibition of yeast growth at higher concentrations.</p
Identification of substances in migrates of samples which were hormone active in bioassay analysis.
a<p>… identification of the substance verified by comparison to a standard.</p>b<p>… identification of the substances by database comparison of mass spectra, not verified by comparison to a standard.</p><p>LOD…Limit of detection.</p><p>LOQ…Limit of quantification.</p><p>CAS#… Chemical Abstracts Service Number.</p
Food simulants for the migration of packaging samples.
a<p>Sample was previously tested by Kirchnawy et al. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0100952#pone.0100952-Kirchnawy1" target="_blank">[1]</a> using the YES.</p>b<p>Migration was done at 60°C for 10 days.</p
Androgen and antiandrogen activity of migrates from plastic samples.
a<p>… inhibition of response to DHT in undiluted samples.</p>b<p>… inhibition of yeast growth in undiluted samples.</p><p>−… no antiandrogen activity was detected.</p><p>+… antiandrogen activity in the range of the activity of 0.01 to 0,1 mg/l flutamide.</p><p>++… antiandrogen activity in the range of the activity of 0.1 to 1 mg/l flutamide.</p><p>+++… antiandrogen activity in the range of the activity of 1 to 10 mg/l flutamide.</p
Estrogen and antiestrogen activity of migrates from plastic samples.
a<p>… inhibition of response to 17β-estradiol in undiluted samples.</p>b<p>… inhibition of yeast growth in undiluted samples.</p><p>−… no antiestrogen activity was detected.</p><p>+… antiestrogen activity in the range of the activity of 0.01 to 0.1 mg/l 4-OHT.</p><p>++… antiestrogen activity in the range of the activity of 0.1 to 1 mg/l 4-OHT.</p><p>+++… antiestrogen activity in the range of the activity of 1 to 10 mg/l 4-OHT.</p
GC-MS-Analysis: Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) of a migrate of sample CF 1.
<p>GC-MS-Analysis: Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) of a migrate of sample CF 1.</p