Predictors of asthma control differ from predictors of asthma attacks in children: The Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort.

BACKGROUND It is unclear if predictors of asthma attacks are the same as those of asthma symptom control in children. OBJECTIVE We evaluated predictors for these two outcomes in a clinical cohort study. METHODS The Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort (SPAC) is a multicentre prospective clinical cohort of children referred to paediatric pulmonologists. This analysis included 516 children (5-16 years old) diagnosed with asthma. At baseline, we collected sociodemographic information, symptoms, personal and family history and environmental exposures from a parental baseline questionnaire, and treatment and test results from hospital records. Outcomes were assessed 1 year later by parental questionnaire: asthma control in the last 4 weeks as defined by GINA guidelines, and asthma attacks defined as any unscheduled visit for asthma in the past year. We used logistic regression to identify and compare predictors for suboptimal asthma control and asthma attacks. RESULTS At follow-up, 114/516 children (22%), reported suboptimal asthma control, and 114 (22%) an incident asthma attack. Only 37 (7%) reported both. Suboptimal asthma control was associated with poor symptom control at baseline (e.g. ≥1 night wheeze/week OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.7-6), wheeze triggered by allergens (2.2; 1.4-3.3), colds (2.3; 1.4-3.6) and exercise (3.2; 2-5), a more intense treatment at baseline (2.4; 1.3-4.4 for Step 3 vs. 1), history of preschool (2.6; 1.5-4.4) and persistent wheeze (2; 1.4-3.2), and exposure to tobacco smoke (1.7; 1-2.6). Incident asthma attacks were associated with previous episodes of severe wheeze (2; 1.2-3.3) and asthma attacks (2.8; 1.6-5 for emergency care visits), younger age (0.8; 0.8-0.9 per 1 year) and non-Swiss origin (0.3; 0.2-0.5 for Swiss origin). Lung function, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and allergic sensitization at baseline were not associated with control or attacks. CONCLUSION Children at risk of long-term suboptimal asthma control differ from those at risk of attacks. Prediction tools and preventive efforts should differentiate these two asthma outcomes

The clinical features of asthma exacerbations in early-onset and eosinophilic late-onset asthma may differ significantly

Over 20 years ago, the concept of asthma control was created and appropriate measurement tools were developed and validated. Loss of asthma control can lead to an exacerbation. Years ago, the term "clinically significant asthma exacerbation" was introduced to define when a loss of control is severe enough to declare it an asthma exacerbation. This term is also used by health insurances to determine when an exacerbation is eligible for reimbursement of biologics in clinical practice, however, it sometimes becomes apparent that a clear separation between loss of "asthma control" and an exacerbation is not always possible. In this review, we attempt to justify why exacerbations in early allergic asthma and adult eosinophilic asthma can differ significantly and why this is important in clinical practice as well as when dealing with health insurers

COPD – eine unterschätzte Erkrankung

COPD - An Underestimated Disease Abstract: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous lung condition with a complex clinical picture. The diagnosis is not easy to make because COPD can develop insidiously and remain unnoticed for a long time. Therefore, general practitioners play a central role in the early detection of the disease. Suspected COPD can be confirmed by special examinations in collaboration with pulmonologists. The new GOLD guideline defines three COPD risk groups (A-B-E) which should guide the personalized treatment concept. A short- or long-acting bronchodilator (SAMA/SABA or LAMA/LABA) is recommended for group A, and a dual long-acting bronchodilator therapy (LABA+LAMA) is recommended for group B and E. In case of blood eosinophilia (≥300 cells/µl) and/or recent hospitalization for COPD exacerbation, triple therapy (LABA+LAMA+ICS) is recommended. General practitioners are important in implementing non-pharmacological measures (smoking cessation, regular exercise, vaccinations, patient selfmanagement education). However, this also underlines the high demands of the implementation of the GOLD guideline in daily practice.COPD ist eine heterogene Erkrankung mit komplexem Krankheitsbild. Die Diagnose ist nicht einfach zu stellen, denn COPD kann sich schleichend entwickeln und lange unbemerkt bleiben. Hausärztinnen und -ärzten kommt daher für die Früherkennung eine zentrale Rolle zu. Der COPD-Verdacht kann in Zusammenarbeit mit Pneumologen durch spezielle Untersuchungen abgesichert werden als Voraussetzung für das medikamentöse Therapiekonzept. Die neue GOLD-Guideline definiert drei COPD-Risikogruppen (A-B-E). Für Gruppe A wird ein kurz- oder langwirksamer Bronchodilatator (SAMA/SABA bzw. LAMA/LABA) empfohlen. Für Gruppe B und E wird eine Kombinationstherapie LABA+LAMA empfohlen. Bei Bluteosinophilie (≥ 300 Zellen/μl) und/oder kürzlicher Hospitalisierung aufgrund einer COPD-Exazerbation wird eine Dreifachtherapie (LABA+LAMA+ICS) empfohlen. Hausärztinnen und -ärzte sind wichtig bei der Umsetzung therapiebegleitender Massnahmen (Coaching von Patientinnen und Patienten, Impfungen, Rauchstopp, regelmässige Bewegung). Dies unterstreicht aber auch die hohen Anforderungen der Umsetzung der GOLD-Guideline in den Praxisalltag

Resting and Post Bronchial Challenge Testing Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure in Individuals with and without Asthma

Objective: There is conflicting evidence about resting carbon dioxide levels in asthmatic individuals. We wanted to determine if transcutaneously measured carbon dioxide levels prior and during bronchial provocation testing differ according to asthma status reflecting dysfunctional breathing. Methods: We investigated active firefighters and policemen by means of a validated questionnaire on respiratory symptoms, spirometry, bronchial challenge testing with methacholine (MCT) and measurement of transcutaneous blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (PtcCO 2) at rest prior performing spirometry, one minute and five minutes after termination of MCT. A respiratory physician blinded to the PtcCO2 results assigned a diagnosis of asthma after reviewing the available study data and the files of the workers medical screening program. Results: The study sample consisted of 128 male and 10 female individuals. Fifteen individuals (11%) had physiciandiagnosed asthma. There was no clinically important difference in median PtcCO 2 at rest, one and five minutes after recovery from MCT in asthmatics compared to non-asthmatics (35.6 vs 35.7 mmHg, p = 0.466; 34.7 vs 33.4 mmHg, p = 0.245 and 37.4 vs 36.4 mmHg, p = 0.732). The median drop in PtcCO2 during MCT and the increase after MCT was lower in asthmatics compared to non-asthmatics (0.1 vs 3.2 mmHg, p = 0.014 and 1.9 vs 2.9 mmHg, p = 0.025). Conclusions: PtcCO2 levels at rest prior and during recovery after MCT do not differ in individuals with or without physicia

Fluctuation-based clustering reveals phenotypes of patients with different asthma severity

Serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements can identify phenotypes in severe adult asthma, enabling more targeted treatment. The feasibility of this approach in children has not been investigated. Overall, 105 children (67% male, median age 12.4 years) with a range of asthma severities were recruited and followed up over a median of 92 days. PEF was measured twice daily. Fluctuation-based clustering (FBC) was used to identify clusters based on PEF fluctuations. The patients' clinical characteristics were compared between clusters. Three PEF clusters were identified in 44 children with sufficient measurements. Cluster 1 (27% of patients: n=12) had impaired spirometry (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV; 1; ) 71% predicted), significantly higher exhaled nitric oxide (≥35 ppb) and uncontrolled asthma (asthma control test (ACT) score <20 of 25). Cluster 2 (45%: n=20) had normal spirometry, the highest proportion of difficult asthma and significantly more patients on a high dose of inhaled corticosteroids (≥800 µg budesonide). Cluster 3 (27%: n=12) had mean FEV; 1; 92% predicted, the highest proportion of patients with no bronchodilator reversibility, a low ICS dose (≤400 µg budesonide), and controlled asthma (ACT scores ≥20 of 25). Three clinically relevant paediatric asthma clusters were identified using FBC analysis on PEF measurements, which could improve telemonitoring diagnostics. The method remains robust even when 80% of measurements were removed. Further research will determine clinical applicability

A 3-month period of electronic monitoring can provide important information to the healthcare team to assess adherence and improve asthma control

In children with difficult asthma, a single period of electronic monitoring can help to assess a patient's adherence and the possible impact of improved adherence on asthma control https://bit.ly/3c3Gj6

Diagnosis in children with exercise-induced respiratory symptoms: a multi-centre study.

OBJECTIVE Exercise-induced respiratory symptoms (EIS) are common in childhood and reflect different diseases that can be difficult to diagnose. In children referred to respiratory outpatient clinics for EIS, we compared the diagnosis proposed by the primary care physician with the final diagnosis from the outpatient clinic and described diagnostic tests and treatments. DESIGN Observational study of respiratory outpatients aged 0-16 years nested in the Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort (SPAC). PATIENTS We included children with EIS as main reason for referral. Information about diagnostic investigations, final diagnosis, and treatment prescribed came from outpatient records. We included 214 children (mean age 12 years, range 2-17, 54% males) referred for EIS. RESULTS The final diagnosis was asthma in 115 (54%), extrathoracic dysfunctional breathing (DB) in 35 (16%), thoracic DB in 22 (10%), asthma plus DB in 23 (11%), insufficient fitness in 10 (5%), chronic cough in 6 (3%), and other diagnoses in 3 (1%). Final diagnosis differed from referral diagnosis in 115 (54%, 95%-CI 46-60%). Spirometry, body plethysmography, and exhaled nitric oxide were performed in almost all, exercise-challenge tests in a third, and laryngoscopy in none. 91% of the children with a final diagnosis of asthma were prescribed inhaled medication and 50% of children with DB were referred to physiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Diagnosis given at the outpatient clinic often differed from the diagnosis proposed by the referring physician. Diagnostic evaluations, management, and follow-up differed between clinics and diagnostic groups highlighting the need for evidence-based diagnostic guidelines and harmonised procedures for children seen for EIS. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved