Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human menopausal gonadotrophins and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone are the two main gonadotrophin products utilized for controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technologies. In this meta-analysis, the number of oocytes was designated as the most relevant endpoint directly resulting from ovarian stimulation, and therefore where the drug effect may be estimated with the best sensitivity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All published randomized controlled trials on ovarian stimulation comparing the two gonadotrophin products were evaluated. Internal validity was determined using Chalmers' validated scale. If trials did not meet the established quality criteria, a sensitivity analysis assessed the stability of the results. The comparison of continuous variables was conducted following the weighted mean difference and the standardized mean difference (Cohen's effect size) with the random model. Given the known relationship of baseline conditions on treatment endpoints, results were adjusted for age, body mass index and type of infertility.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Sixteen studies involving 4040 patients were included. Treatment with human menopausal gonadotrophins resulted in fewer oocytes (-1.54; 95% CI: -2.53 to -0.56; P < 0.0001) compared to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. When adjusting for baseline conditions, the mean difference estimate was -2.10 (95% CI: -2.83 to -1.36; P < 0.001). A higher total dose of human menopausal gonadotrophin was necessary (mean difference, 235.46 IU [95% CI: 16.62 to 454.30; P = 0.03]; standardized mean difference, 0.33 [95% CI: 0.08 to 0.58; P = 0.01]). The pregnancy absolute risk difference (RD [hMG-r-hFSH]) for fresh transfers was 3% (P = 0.051), and the relative risk 1.10 (P = 0.06). When adjusted for baseline conditions, the relative risk was 1.04 (P = 0.49) and absolute difference was 0.01 (P = 0.34), respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Because baseline conditions are predictive of outcome, meta-analytic results are more sensitive when these variables are considered. Using an endpoint closely associated with the stimulation period, sufficient sensitivity is achieved to compare gonadotrophin treatments. As the largest meta-analysis published to date on this subject, treatment with human menopausal gonadotrophins is characterized by fewer oocytes and a higher total dose. When considering only fresh transfers, pregnancy rates were similar.</p

Dosing Characteristics of Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotrophin-Derived LH Activity in Patients Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation: A German Fertility Database Study

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate dosing of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG)-derived medications with LH activity in ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles for in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Design: A non-interventional study was performed to analyse data from the German RecDate database (January 2007-December 2011). Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods: Starting/total r-hLH/hMG dose, OS duration/cycle number, r-hLH/hMG initiation day (first day of administration), and population/cycle characteristics were assessed in women (&amp; GE;18 years) undergoing OS for IVF/ICSI using r-hLH or hMG-derived medications (excluding corifollitropin alfa, clomiphene citrate, letrozole, mini/micro-dose human chorionic gonadotrophin, and urofollitropin alone). Data were summarized descriptively. Results: 67,858 identified cycles utilized medications containing r-hLH (10,749), hMG (56,432), or both (677). Mean (standard deviation) OS duration with r-hLH and hMG was 10.1 (4.43) and 9.8 (6.16) days, respectively. Median (25th-75th percentile) r-hLH starting dose (75.0 [75.0-150.0] IU) was consistent across patients regardless of age, infertility diagnosis, or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) protocol. Median (25th-75th percentile) hMG-derived LH activity starting dose was 225.0 (150.0-300.0) IU, regardless of GnRH protocol, but was lower in women aged &lt;35 years and those with ovulation disorders/polycystic ovary syndrome. Median (25th-75th percentile) total dose for r-hLH (750.0 [337.5-1,125.0] IU) and hMG-derived LH activity (1,575.0 [750.0-2,625.0] IU) varied according to patients' age, infertility diagnosis, cycle number, and r-hLH/hMG initiation day. GnRH antagonist use resulted in a numerically higher median total hMG-derived LH activity dose than GnRH agonist use. Limitations: The data used in this study were taken from electronic medical records relating to a specific timeframe (2007-2011) and therefore may not accurately reflect current clinical practice; however, it is likely that the differences between the two compounds would be maintained. Additionally, secondary data sources may suffer from uniformity and quality issues. Conclusions: The standard of care for OS cycles is described with respect to IVF/ICSI treatment including an LH component in Germany during the specified timeframe

The Human Oocyte Preservation Experience (HOPE) a phase IV, prospective, multicenter, observational oocyte cryopreservation registry

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>It has been recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Reproductive Medicine that options to preserve fertility be presented at the outset of treatment for cancer. This recommendation may have arisen, in part, to the increasing survival of patients with cancer and the realization that certain forms of cancer treatment can lead to infertility. One option for these patients, particularly those with ethical or religious objections to freezing embryos is oocyte cryopreservation. However universal acceptance of these procedures has yet to be established, most likely due to a poor history of success and concerns that there has yet to be a comprehensive approach to evaluating these techniques. In light of this, a registry of patients undergoing oocyte cryopreservation, called the HOPE registry, is being implemented.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The intent of the HOPE Registry is to enroll approximately 400 women of reproductive age who will undergo thawing/warming of oocytes and subsequent transfer. Data from the patients enrolled will be collected via a uniform, standardized form and will document important parameters such as demographics, laboratory procedures and outcomes, including following the outcomes of babies born for one year after birth. The results of the registry will be published on a yearly basis.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>A patient registry has been established in order to systematically document the techniques and outcomes of oocyte cryopreservation procedures. The results will be published in order to provide a widely accessible resource that will allow patients who are considering these procedures validated information in order to make informed decisions as to how their treatment will proceed.</p

Patient evaluation of the redesigned follitropin alfa pen injector

<p><b>Objectives</b>: We aimed to evaluate the overall impressions of learning and subsequent use of the redesigned GONAL-f® (follitropin alfa) pen injector by women with recent or current infertility requiring assisted reproductive technologies (ART) or <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF).</p> <p><b>Methods</b>: This was a simulated-use study including 86 women with infertility and 30 fertility nurses. Nurses trained the women on the use of the redesigned pen. The opinions of the women on the pen injector were collected during a questionnaire interview. Fertility nurse opinions on patient anxiety were collected before training.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: The pen injector was considered easy to learn to use and easy to use, particularly setting the dose and reading the number on the dial. After training, most women felt confident they could self-administer medication without further training. Most women would recommend the redesigned pen injector to friends and family requiring IVF treatment. Overall, fertility nurses overestimated how anxious the women would be when using the pen injector.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: This study demonstrated that both IVF/ART-experienced and -naïve women with infertility found the redesigned pen injector easy to learn to use and to use.</p

Dose accuracy of the redesigned follitropin alfa pen injector for infertility treatment

<p><b>Objectives:</b> The prefilled, multi-dose follitropin alfa (GONAL-f®) pen injector was redesigned based upon user feedback, to improve pen functionality. The dose information display was altered with the intention of improving readability and the dosing mechanism hardware was modified to increase robustness. The dose accuracy of the redesigned pen injector was evaluated under different conditions and after handling processes.</p> <p><b>Methods:</b> Three studies investigated the dose accuracy of the three presentations (300, 450 and 900 IU) of the redesigned pen injector according to the ISO 11608-1:2012/2014 standard. The dose accuracy was evaluated in cold, standard and warm atmospheres, and subsequent to freefall, vibration, dry-heat, cold-storage and shipping preconditioning. The total extractable volume and dispense force of the pen injector were also investigated.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> All doses dispensed with all three presentations, under all the conditions examined, were within the limits for accuracy defined by the ISO standard, as was the total extractable volume. The mean ± standard deviation dispense force was 12.5 ± 0.99 and 13.8 ± 1.16 N for the 300 and 900 IU pen injectors, respectively. These are below the upper threshold of the range considered optimal for pen injectors.</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> These studies demonstrate that the redesigned pen injector functions reliably, dispensing accurate doses under the range of conditions studied.</p