COVID-19 vaccinations : summary guidance for cancer patients in 28 languages : breaking barriers to cancer patient information

Background Covid-19 vaccination has started in the majority of the countries at the global level. Cancer patients are at high risk for infection, serious illness, and death from COVID-19 and need vaccination guidance and support. Guidance availability in the English language only is a major limit for recommendations' delivery and their application in the world’s population and generates information inequalities across the different populations. Methods Most of the available COVID-19 vaccination guidance for cancer patients was screened and scrutinized by the European Cancer Patients Coalition (ECPC) and an international oncology panel of 52 physicians from 33 countries.Results: A summary guidance was developed and provided in 28 languages in order to reach more than 70 percent of the global population. Conclusion Language barrier and e-guidance availability in the native language are the most important barriers when communicating with patients. E-guidance availability in various native languages should be considered a major priority by international medical and health organizations that are communicating with patients at the global level

COVID-19 vaccinations: summary guidance for Cancer patients in 28Languages: breaking barriers to Cancer patient Information

Background: Covid-19 vaccination has started in the majority of the countries at the global level. Cancer patients are at high risk for infection, serious illness, and death from COVID-19 and need vaccination guidance and support. Guidance availability in the English language only is a major limit for recommendations' delivery and their application in the world's population and generates information inequalities across the different populations. Methods: Most of the available COVID-19 vaccination guidance for cancer patients was screened and scrutinized by the European Cancer Patients Coalition (ECPC) and an international oncology panel of 52 physicians from 33 countries. Results: A summary guidance was developed and provided in 28 languages in order to reach more than 70 percent of the global population. Conclusion: Language barrier and e-guidance availability in the native language are the most important barriers when communicating with patients. E-guidance availability in various native languages should be considered a major priority by international medical and health organizations that are communicating with patients at the global level.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Prognostic value of blood cell count-derived ratios in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma

Background. The treatment and prognosis of metastatic melanoma have changed during the last decade to include immunotherapy or targeted therapy as standard therapeutic options for BRAF-mutated melanoma. However, predictive and/or prognostic markers are lacking, especially in clinical situations where several options are available. The aim of this study was to determine the association of pre-therapeutic blood cell count-derived ratios (BCDR) with survival in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. Methods. We evaluated the prognostic role of BCDR in therapy-naïve patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy. The impact of BCDR on survival was analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results. We enrolled 46 patients treated with BRAF inhibitors and 20 patients who received anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.3 and 18.2 months, respectively, with no statistical difference between groups. The objective response rate was 39% (30% in the anti-PD-1 and 44% in the targeted therapy groups). Baseline BCDR values were associated with improved PFS and OS in the immunotherapy group. Only the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was associated with OS and PFS in the targeted therapy group. Independent prognostic indicators for PFS were lactate dehydrogenase, PLR and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and those for OS were LMR, toxicity and the number of initial metastases. Conclusion. BCDR had a substantial prognostic value in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, a prognostic role for BCDR seemed less apparent in patients treated with targeted therapies

Utilization and efficacy of second-line targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: data from a national registry

Abstract Background It is well known that patient characteristics and survival outcomes in randomized trials may not necessarily be similar to those in real-life clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to analyse second line treatment strategies in the real-world practice and to estimate the outcomes of patients treated with second-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods This is a retrospective, registry-based study using data from the national registry of targeted therapies for mRCC. The RENIS registry contains data on 3049 patients who started the therapy with at least one targeted agent before 31 December, 2014. Of these patients, 1029 had a record of at least two different targeted therapies and sufficient data for analysis. Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical significance of differences in survival between subgroups was assessed using the log-rank test. Results The median overall survival from the start of second-line treatment was 17.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.5–19.5 months), 17.1 months (95% CI 14.5–19.8), and 15.4 months (95% CI 11.0–19.7) for second-line everolimus, sorafenib, and sunitinib, respectively. Patients receiving second-line everolimus were older at the start of second-line treatment, more likely to have metachronous disease, and less likely to be previously treated with cytokines or to continue to third-line treatment than patients treated with second-line sunitinib or sorafenib. Progression-free survival (PFS) correlated with PFS on first-line treatment only for everolimus. Conclusions In this retrospective study, no significant differences in survival were observed between the cohorts treated with different second-line agents including everolimus, sorafenib, and sunitinib

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Patients Treated With First-Line Immune Combinations for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Insights From the ARON-1 Study

Background: Systemic treatment with immune combinations is the gold standard for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) worldwide. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a prognostic marker for several types of malignant neoplasms, including mRCC, in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Data regarding the prognostic value of the SII in patients with mRCC treated with immunotherapy are scarce and controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of patients with mRCC from 56 centers in 18 countries. SII (Platelet × Neutrophil/Lymphocyte count) was calculated prior to the first systemic treatment and cut-off was defined by a survival receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The primary objective of our retrospective study was to assess the outcomes of patients treated with first-line immunotherapy. RESULTS: Data from 1034 mRCC patients was collected and included in this analysis. The SII cut-off value was 1265. After a follow-up of 26.7 months, and the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 39.8 and 15.7 months, respectively. According to SII (low vs. high), patients with low-SII had longer OS (55.7 vs. 22.2 months, P < .001), better PFS (20.8 vs. 8.5 months, P < .001), and higher overall response rate (52 vs. 37%, P = .033). Conclusion: A high SII is associated with poor oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC. SII could be an easily accessible prognostic indicator for use in clinical practice

Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA can optimize second-line treatment in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer after progression on anti-EGFR therapy : time to rethink our approach

Background: Management of Ras wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients upon disease progression after the successful use of targeted treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and backbone chemotherapy remains a clinical challenge. Summary: Development of treatment resistance with prevalence of preexisting RAS mutated clones, RAS mutation conversion, truncation of extracellular receptor domains as well as HER2 and MET amplification are molecular events that can be difficult to follow without the use of sophisticated laboratory techniques. The clinical hurdle of re-biopsy and tumor heterogeneity can be overcome by the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and identify druggable mutations or recovery of RAS-wildness. In this opinion paper, we summarize with critical thinking the clinical approach to be followed after the failure of first-line treatment in Ras wild-type CRC tumors with the use of NGS. Rechallenge with anti-EGFR inhibitors, in case of persistent or recovery of RAS-wildness, and targeted approach of specific mutations (BRAF inhibitors), amplifications (anti-Her2 treatment), or fusion proteins (NTRK inhibitors) can by guided by the use of NGS. The use of NGS platforms for serial analysis of ctDNA is an important step to better understand the molecular landscape of metastatic CRC and guide clinical decisions. Key Messages: NGS should be considered a mainstay in clinical practice for the management of CRC patients and health authorities should consider reimbursing its use in the appropriate clinical settings

Next-Generation Sequencing of Circulating Tumor DNA Can Optimize Second-Line Treatment in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer after Progression on anti-EGFR Therapy: Time to Rethink Our Approach

Background: Management of Ras wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients upon disease progression after the successful use of targeted treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and backbone chemotherapy remains a clinical challenge. Summary: Development of treatment resistance with prevalence of preexisting RAS mutated clones, RAS mutation conversion, truncation of extracellular receptor domains as well as HER2 and MET amplification are molecular events that can be difficult to follow without the use of sophisticated laboratory techniques. The clinical hurdle of re-biopsy and tumor heterogeneity can be overcome by the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and identify druggable mutations or recovery of RAS-wildness. In this opinion paper, we summarize with critical thinking the clinical approach to be followed after the failure of first-line treatment in Ras wild-type CRC tumors with the use of NGS. Rechallenge with anti-EGFR inhibitors, in case of persistent or recovery of RAS-wildness, and targeted approach of specific mutations (BRAF inhibitors), amplifications (anti-Her2 treatment), or fusion proteins (NTRK inhibitors) can by guided by the use of NGS. The use of NGS platforms for serial analysis of ctDNA is an important step to better understand the molecular landscape of metastatic CRC and guide clinical decisions. Key Messages: NGS should be considered a mainstay in clinical practice for the management of CRC patients and health authorities should consider reimbursing its use in the appropriate clinical settings