8 research outputs found
Atomic Sn–enabled high-utilization, large-capacity, and long-life Na anode
Constructing robust nucleation sites with an ultrafine size in a confined environment is essential toward simultaneously achieving superior utilization, high capacity, and long-term durability in Na metal-based energy storage, yet remains largely unexplored. Here, we report a previously unexplored design of spatially confined atomic Sn in hollow carbon spheres for homogeneous nucleation and dendrite-free growth. The designed architecture maximizes Sn utilization, prevents agglomeration, mitigates volume variation, and allows complete alloying-dealloying with high-affinity Sn as persistent nucleation sites, contrary to conventional spatially exposed large-size ones without dealloying. Thus, conformal deposition is achieved, rendering an exceptional capacity of 16 mAh cm−2 in half-cells and long cycling over 7000 hours in symmetric cells. Moreover, the well-known paradox is surmounted, delivering record-high Na utilization (e.g., 85%) and large capacity (e.g., 8 mAh cm−2) while maintaining extraordinary durability over 5000 hours, representing an important breakthrough for stabilizing Na anode
Recommended from our members
Glassy Metal–Organic-Framework-Based Quasi-Solid-State Electrolyte for High-Performance Lithium-Metal Batteries
Enhancing ionic conductivity of quasi-solid-state electrolytes (QSSEs) is one of the top priorities, while conventional metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) severely impede ion migration due to their abundant grain boundaries. Herein, ZIF-4 glass, a subset of MOFs, is reported as QSSEs (LGZ) for lithium-metal batteries. With lean Li content (0.12 wt%) and solvent amount (19.4 wt%), LGZ can achieve a remarkable ion conductivity of 1.61 × 10−4 S cm−1 at 30 °C, higher than those of crystalline ZIF-4-based QSSEs (LCZ, 8.21 × 10−5 S cm−1) and the reported QSSEs containing high Li contents (0.32–5.4 wt%) and huge plasticizer (30–70 wt%). Even at −56.6 °C, LGZ can still deliver a conductivity of 5.96 × 10−6 S cm−1 (vs 4.51 × 10−7 S cm−1 for LCZ). Owing to the grain boundary-free and isotropic properties of glassy ZIF-4, the facilitated ion conduction enables a homogeneous ion flux, suppressing Li dendrites. When paired with LiFePO4 cathode, LGZ cell demonstrates a prominent cycling capacity of 101 mAh g−1 for 500 cycles at 1 C with the near-utility retention, outperforming LCZ (30.7 mAh g−1) and the explored MOF-/covalent–organic frameworks (COF)-based QSSEs. Hence, MOF glasses will be a potential platform for practical quasi-solid-state batteries in the future. © 2021 The Authors. Advanced Functional Materials published by Wiley-VCH Gmb
Fluorinated, Sulfur-Rich, Covalent Triazine Frameworks for Enhanced Confinement of Polysulfides in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Lithium–sulfur
battery represents a promising class of energy storage technology
owing to its high theoretical energy density and low cost. However,
the insulating nature, shuttling of soluble polysulfides and volumetric
expansion of sulfur electrodes seriously give rise to the rapid capacity
fading and low utilization. In this work, these issues are significantly
alleviated by both physically and chemically restricting sulfur species
in fluorinated porous triazine-based frameworks (FCTF-S). One-step
trimerization of perfluorinated aromatic nitrile monomers with elemental
sulfur allows the simultaneous formation of fluorinated triazine-based
frameworks, covalent attachment of sulfur and its homogeneous distribution
within the pores. The incorporation of electronegative fluorine in
frameworks provides a strong anchoring effect to suppress the dissolution
and accelerate the conversion of polysulfides. Together with covalent
chemical binding and physical nanopore-confinement effects, the FCTF-S
demonstrates superior electrochemical performances, as compared to
those of the sulfur-rich covalent triazine-based framework without
fluorine (CTF-S) and porous carbon delivering only physical confinement.
Our approach demonstrates the potential of regulating lithium–sulfur
battery performances at a molecular scale promoted by the porous organic
polymers with a flexible design
Recent Developments on Processes for Recovery of Rhodium Metal from Spent Catalysts
Rhodium (Rh) catalyst has played an indispensable role in many important industrial and technological applications due to its unique and valuable properties. Currently, Rh is considered as a strategic or critical metal as the scarce high-quality purity can only be supplemented by refining coarse ores with low content (2–10 ppm) and is far from meeting the fast-growing market demand. Nowadays, exploring new prospects has already become an urgent issue because of the gradual depletion of Rh resources, incidental pressure on environmental protection, and high market prices. Since waste catalyst materials, industrial equipment, and electronic instruments contain Rh with a higher concentration than that of natural minerals, recovering Rh from scrap not only offers an additional source to satisfy market demand but also reduces the risk of ore over-exploitation. Therefore, the recovery of Rh-based catalysts from scrap is of great significance. This review provides an overview of the Rh metal recovery from spent catalysts. The characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of several current recovery processes, including pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and biosorption technology, are presented and compared. Among them, the hydrometallurgical process is commonly used for Rh recovery from auto catalysts due to its technological simplicity, low cost, and short processing time, but the overall recovery rate is low due to its high remnant Rh within the insoluble residue and the unstable leaching. In contrast, higher Rh recovery and less effluent discharge can be ensured by a pyrometallurgical process which therefore is widely employed in industry to extract precious metals from spent catalysts. However, the related procedure is quite complex, leading to an expensive hardware investment, high energy consumption, long recovery cycles, and inevitable difficulties in controlling contamination in practice. Compared to conventional recovery methods, the biosorption process is considered to be a cost-effective biological route for Rh recovery owing to its intrinsic merits, e.g., low operation costs, small volume, and low amount of chemicals and biological sludge to be treated. Finally, we summarize the challenges and prospect of these three recovery processes in the hope that the community can gain more meaningful and comprehensive insights into Rh recovery