13 research outputs found

    Head injury in the elderly - what are the outcomes of neurosurgical care?

    Get PDF
    Epidemiological studies show that an increasing proportion of those presenting with head trauma are elderly. This study details the outcomes of elderly head trauma patients admitted to a regional UK neurosurgical unit.The notes and imaging were reviewed of all head injury patients aged ≥75 years, admitted from 01/01/2007 to 31/12/2010, including mortality data up to at least 2 years after discharge . Outcomes comprised death as an inpatient, by 30 days and 1 year post-discharge; Glasgow Outcome Score; discharge Glasgow Coma Score; recurrence; readmission; reoperation; and complication.263 patients were admitted: 26 with acute subdural haematoma (ASDH); 175 with chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH); and 46 with mixed subdural collections (ACSDH). Sixteen patients had other head injury diagnoses. ASDH cases had a significantly lower survival rate than those with CSDH or ACSDH: The odds of inpatient death for ASDH patients was 15.38 (vs CSDHs). For all SDHs, low ASA was an independent predictor of early death. Death at one year was predicted by head injury severity measured by admission GCS (p=0.028), long anaesthetic (p=0.002), and the presence of bilateral SDH (p=0.002). Unfavourable GOS (1-3) was predicted by age over 85y (p=0.029); larger depth of subdural (p<0.001); and presence of any complication (p=0.003). Those aged over 90 with presentation GCS under 10 all had poor outcomes.Most elderly patients admitted under neurosurgery after head injury have SDHs. Our results are better than many previously reported, however the rate of death for those with ASDH is still high

    CovidNeuroOnc: A UK multicenter, prospective cohort study of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the neuro-oncology service

    Get PDF
    BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected cancer services. Our objective was to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on decision making and the resulting outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent intracranial tumors.MethodsWe performed a multicenter prospective study of all adult patients discussed in weekly neuro-oncology and skull base multidisciplinary team meetings who had a newly diagnosed or recurrent intracranial (excluding pituitary) tumor between 01 April and 31 May 2020. All patients had at least 30-day follow-up data. Descriptive statistical reporting was used.ResultsThere were 1357 referrals for newly diagnosed or recurrent intracranial tumors across 15 neuro-oncology centers. Of centers with all intracranial tumors, a change in initial management was reported in 8.6% of cases (n = 104/1210). Decisions to change the management plan reduced over time from a peak of 19% referrals at the start of the study to 0% by the end of the study period. Changes in management were reported in 16% (n = 75/466) of cases previously recommended for surgery and 28% of cases previously recommended for chemotherapy (n = 20/72). The reported SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was similar in surgical and non-surgical patients (2.6% vs. 2.4%, P > .9).ConclusionsDisruption to neuro-oncology services in the UK caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was most marked in the first month, affecting all diagnoses. Patients considered for chemotherapy were most affected. In those recommended surgical treatment this was successfully completed. Longer-term outcome data will evaluate oncological treatments received by these patients and overall survival

    Sir Hugh Cairns: A pioneering collaborator

    No full text
    In April 1988, Peter Schurr delivered the twelfth Sir Hugh Cairns Memorial Lecture to the Society of British Neurological Surgeons. In his lecture, The Cairns Tradition, Schurr extolled the personal virtues of Cairns. He encouraged his colleagues to draw inspiration from Cairns’ renowned determination, organisation, drive for perfection, compassion, and commitment to the training of those around him. Indeed, Cairns’ own personality has come to define the specialty which he established in Britain. Today’s neurosurgeons are, whether knowingly or not, formed in his image. But there is a side to Hugh Cairns that has been lost in the telling of his remarkable story, and yet it played a central role in his greatest achievements. This is the side of himself which he turned towards others. Throughout his career, Cairns received an inordinate number of personal accolades. His tutelage under Cushing during a formative trip to America and the impact of his role in caring for T. E. Lawrence are well known to many. But, more than thirty years after Peter Schurr’s memorial lecture, and following the eightieth anniversary of the department of neurosurgery founded by Cairns in Oxford, it is his work as a pioneering collaborator which defines his legacy today, and which calls us to learn yet another lesson from his remarkable life. In this legacy article, we review the origins of Cairns’ collaborative spirit and uncover the achievements he shared with Charles Hallpike, Howard Florey, Derek Denny-Brown, William Ritchie Russell, Ludwig Guttman, and Peter Medawar, among many others. </p

    Sir Hugh Cairns: A pioneering collaborator

    No full text
    In April 1988, Peter Schurr delivered the twelfth Sir Hugh Cairns Memorial Lecture to the Society of British Neurological Surgeons. In his lecture, The Cairns Tradition, Schurr extolled the personal virtues of Cairns. He encouraged his colleagues to draw inspiration from Cairns’ renowned determination, organisation, drive for perfection, compassion, and commitment to the training of those around him. Indeed, Cairns’ own personality has come to define the specialty which he established in Britain. Today’s neurosurgeons are, whether knowingly or not, formed in his image. But there is a side to Hugh Cairns that has been lost in the telling of his remarkable story, and yet it played a central role in his greatest achievements. This is the side of himself which he turned towards others. Throughout his career, Cairns received an inordinate number of personal accolades. His tutelage under Cushing during a formative trip to America and the impact of his role in caring for T. E. Lawrence are well known to many. But, more than thirty years after Peter Schurr’s memorial lecture, and following the eightieth anniversary of the department of neurosurgery founded by Cairns in Oxford, it is his work as a pioneering collaborator which defines his legacy today, and which calls us to learn yet another lesson from his remarkable life. In this legacy article, we review the origins of Cairns’ collaborative spirit and uncover the achievements he shared with Charles Hallpike, Howard Florey, Derek Denny-Brown, William Ritchie Russell, Ludwig Guttman, and Peter Medawar, among many others. </p

    Reduced decision bias and more rational decision making following ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage

    No full text
    Human decisions are susceptible to biases, but establishing causal roles of brain areas has proved to be difficult. Here we studied decision biases in 17 people with unilateral medial prefrontal cortex damage and a rare patient with bilateral ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) lesions. Participants learned to choose which of two options was most likely to win, and then bet money on the outcome. Thus, good performance required not only selecting the best option, but also the amount to bet. Healthy people were biased by their previous bet, as well as by the unchosen option's value. Unilateral medial prefrontal lesions reduced these biases, leading to more rational decisions. Bilateral vmPFC lesions resulted in more strategic betting, again with less bias from the previous trial, paradoxically improving performance overall. Together, the results suggest that vmPFC normally imposes contextual biases, which in healthy people may actually be suboptimal in some situations
    corecore