11 research outputs found

    Loss of Melanopsin Photoreception and Antagonism of the Histamine H3 Receptor by Ciproxifan Inhibit Light-Induced Sleep in Mice

    Get PDF
    Light has direct effects on sleep and wakefulness causing arousal in diurnal animals and sleep in nocturnal animals. In the present study, we assessed the modulation of light-induced sleep by melanopsin and the histaminergic system by exposing mice to millisecond light flashes and continuous light respectively. First, we show that the induction of sleep by millisecond light flashes is dose dependent as a function of light flash number. We found that exposure to 60 flashes of light occurring once every 60 seconds for 1-h (120-ms of total light over an hour) induced a similar amount of sleep as a continuous bright light pulse. Secondly, the induction of sleep by millisecond light flashes was attenuated in the absence of melanopsin when animals were presented with flashes occurring every 60 seconds over a 3-h period beginning at ZT13. Lastly, the acute administration of a histamine H3 autoreceptor antagonist, ciproxifan, blocked the induction of sleep by a 1-h continuous light pulse during the dark period. Ciproxifan caused a decrease in NREMS delta power and an increase in theta activity during both sleep and wake periods respectively. The data suggest that some form of temporal integration occurs in response to millisecond light flashes, and that this process requires melanopsin photoreception. Furthermore, the pharmacological data suggest that the increase of histaminergic neurotransmission is sufficient to attenuate the light-induced sleep response during the dark period.Down Syndrome Research and Treatment FoundationResearch Down Syndrome Organizatio

    Melanopsin required for millisecond light flash induced sleep early in the dark period.

    No full text
    <p>(A,B) Total sleep (NREMS +REMS) during flash stimulation delivered once every 60 seconds for 3 hours between ZT13-15 is shown in WT (n = 8) and MKO (n = 6) mice. Baseline period is shown by the black bars (NO FLASH) and the stimulation period is shown by the white bars (Flash ON). **p = 0.009, paired <i>t</i> test. (C,D) Hourly total sleep between ZT12-16 is shown for WT and MKO mice during baseline (top graph) and stimulation (bottom graph). During baseline, no effect of genotype was detected. However, an effect of time (*) was detected. During the flash stimulation (ZT13-15), two-way repeated measures ANOVA reveals an effect of genotype but no time effect. No interaction was detected (see text for details). *p < 0.05 by Bonferroni’s <i>post hoc t</i> test versus WT mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.</p

    Effects of ciproxifan administration on light-induced sleep and cortical EEG early in the dark period.

    No full text
    <p>(A) An illustration of the protocol used to assess the effect of ciproxifan administration on light-induced sleep is shown. Twenty minutes before exposure no light or continuous light at ZT13, mice (n = 7) were administered with saline (SAL) or ciproxifan (CIP) (12mg/kg, i.p). The light exposure lasted one hour. (B) Total sleep in response to saline or ciproxifan during the no pulse (NP) condition and the light pulse (LP) condition is shown. *p<0.05; by Tukey’s <i>post hoc t</i> test after one-way repeated measures ANOVA. (C) Representative EEG and EMG traces are shown after saline and ciproxifan administration in the light condition. (D, E) Power in the 0.8–40 Hz range for artifact-free recordings was averaged, and the mean values plotted as previously described [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0128175#pone.0128175.ref003" target="_blank">3</a>]. (<i>Insets</i>) Delta/theta ratios during NREMS and wake were calculated and plotted. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 5). *p<0.05, **p<0.001 by paired <i>t</i> test.</p

    Effects of ciproxifan administration on locomotor activity.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Representative actograms from mice exposed to light with saline or ciproxifan. Days are indicated on the left and time during the day is indicated on the top. Light period was between 0700–1900 hrs and the dark period was between 1900–0700 hrs. The asterisk (day 4) indicates the period when the light pulse was given (2000–2100 hrs) after saline or ciproxifan administration 20 min before the pulse. (B) Quantification of locomotor activity (total count between 2000–2100 hrs) during no light pulse (black bars) and light pulse condition (white bars) after saline and ciproxifan administration is shown. Note that baseline refers to no light pulse or administration of either saline or ciproxifan. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3–7). *p<0.05 by Tukey’s <i>post hoc t</i> test after one-way ANOVA for saline and ciproxifan treatments.</p

    Sleep induction in response to different number of light flashes.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Wildtype mice (n = 8) received equally distributed light flashes (0, 1, 3, 15 and 60) across a 60 minute period beginning at ZT13. (B) Total sleep (NREMS+REMS), (C) NREMS, and (D) REMS are shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 ****p < 0.0001; versus baseline (0 pulses) by one-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's <i>post-hoc</i> test. The continuous pulse data (white bar) are from Muindi et al. (2013). Data expressed as mean ± SD.</p

    Functional health and white matter hyperintensities as effect modifiers of blood pressure-lowering on cognitive function and vascular events in older Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes trial participants.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE To determine whether cerebral small vessel disease or disability modify the effect of SBP treatment on cognitive and vascular outcomes in older patients with recent lacunar stroke. METHODS Participants aged at least 65 years of the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes Trial were randomized to a higher (130-149 mmHg) or lower (<130 mmHg) SBP target. The primary outcome was change in cognitive function (Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument); secondary outcomes were incident mild cognitive impairment, stroke, major vascular events (all-stroke, myocardial infarction), and all-cause death. Results were stratified by severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMH; none/mild, moderate, severe) on baseline MRI, and by disability (no vs. at least one limitation in activities of daily living). RESULTS One thousand, two hundred and sixty-three participants (mean age 73.8 ± 5.9 years, 40% women) were included. Participants with severe WMH or disability had worse cognitive function at baseline and after a mean follow-up of 3.9 years. No significant interactions existed between treatment group and effect modifiers (WMH, disability) for change in cognitive function (P for interaction 0.42 and 0.66, respectively). A lower SBP target appeared more beneficial among those with worse WMH burden for vascular outcomes (P for interaction = 0.01 for stroke and 0.03 for major vascular events). CONCLUSION There was no difference in the effect of lowering SBP to less than 130 mmHg on cognitive function by cerebral small vessel disease or disability among older adults with a history of lacunar stroke. Those with evidence of small vessel disease may derive greater benefit from lower SBP on prevention of subsequent vascular events. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00059306
    corecore