Niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DNA repair gene defects (GALAHAD): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

Background Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers are enriched for DNA repair gene defects (DRDs) that can be susceptible to synthetic lethality through inhibition of PARP proteins. We evaluated the anti-tumour activity and safety of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers and DRDs who progressed on previous treatment with an androgen signalling inhibitor and a taxane. Methods In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mixed histology accepted, with the exception of the small cell pure phenotype) and DRDs (assessed in blood, tumour tissue, or saliva), with progression on a previous next-generation androgen signalling inhibitor and a taxane per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 or Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, were eligible. Enrolled patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily until treatment discontinuation, death, or study termination. For the final study analysis, all patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis population; patients with germline pathogenic or somatic biallelic pathogenic alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA cohort) or biallelic alterations in other prespecified DRDs (non-BRCA cohort) were included in the efficacy analysis population. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in patients with BRCA alterations and measurable disease (measurable BRCA cohort). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02854436. Findings Between Sept 28, 2016, and June 26, 2020, 289 patients were enrolled, of whom 182 (63%) had received three or more systemic therapies for prostate cancer. 223 (77%) of 289 patients were included in the overall efficacy analysis population, which included BRCA (n=142) and non-BRCA (n=81) cohorts. At final analysis, with a median follow-up of 10·0 months (IQR 6·6–13·3), the objective response rate in the measurable BRCA cohort (n=76) was 34·2% (95% CI 23·7–46·0). In the safety analysis population, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were nausea (169 [58%] of 289), anaemia (156 [54%]), and vomiting (111 [38%]); the most common grade 3 or worse events were haematological (anaemia in 95 [33%] of 289; thrombocytopenia in 47 [16%]; and neutropenia in 28 [10%]). Of 134 (46%) of 289 patients with at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event, the most common were also haematological (thrombocytopenia in 17 [6%] and anaemia in 13 [4%]). Two adverse events with fatal outcome (one patient with urosepsis in the BRCA cohort and one patient with sepsis in the non-BRCA cohort) were deemed possibly related to niraparib treatment. Interpretation Niraparib is tolerable and shows anti-tumour activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DRDs, particularly in those with BRCA alterations

Prognostic Value and Clinical Significance of FGFR Genomic Alterations (GAs) in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Patients

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genomic alterations (GAs) represent an actionable target, key to the pathogenesis of some urothelial cancers (UCs). Though FGFR GAs are common in noninvasive UC, little is known about their role in the metastatic(m) setting and response to therapy. This study aimed to assess the impact of FGFR alterations on sensitivity to systemic treatments and survival and to validate Bajorin’s and Bellmunt’s prognostic scores in mUC patients according to their FGFR status. We retrospectively analyzed data from 98 patients with tumor-sequenced UC who received treatment between January 2010 and December 2020. Up to 77 developed metastatic disease and were deemed the study population. Twenty-six showed FGFR GAs. A trend toward a better response to cisplatin and checkpoint inhibitors was suggested favoring FGFR GA tumors. FGFR GA patients who received an FGFR inhibitor as first-line had poorer responses compared with other options (20% vs. 68.4%, p = 0.0065). Median PFS was 6 vs. 5 months in the FGFR GA vs. FGFR WT cohort (p = 0.71). Median OS was significantly worse in the FGFR GA vs. FGFR WT cohort (16.2 vs. 31.9 months, p = 0.045). Multivariate analyses deemed FGFR GAs as a factor independently associated with the outcome (HR 2.59 (95% CI 1.21–5.55)). Bajorin’s model correctly predicted clinical outcomes in the whole study population but not in FGFR GA cases. FGFR GAs are a relevant biomarker in mUC that could condition the response to systemic therapy. New prognostic models, including this molecular determination, should be designed and validated

Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals Defective CYP3A4

PURPOSE Paclitaxel, a widely used chemotherapeutic drug, can cause peripheral neuropathies leading to dose reductions and treatment suspensions and decreasing the quality of life of patients. It has been suggested that genetic variants altering paclitaxel pharmacokinetics increase neuropathy risk, but the major causes of interindividual differences in susceptibility to paclitaxel toxicity remain unexplained. We carried out a whole-exome sequencing (WES) study to identify genetic susceptibility variants associated with paclitaxel neuropathy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Blood samples from 8 patients with severe paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy were selected for WES. An independent cohort of 228 cancer patients with complete paclitaxel neuropathy data was used for variant screening by DHPLC and association analysis. HEK293 cells were used for heterologous expression and characterization of two novel CYP3A4 enzymes. RESULTS WES revealed 2 patients with rare CYP3A4 variants, a premature stop codon (CYP3A4*20 allele) and a novel missense variant (CYP3A4*25, p.P389S) causing reduced enzyme expression. Screening for CYP3A4 variants in the independent cohort revealed three additional CYP3A4*20 carriers, and two patients with missense variants exhibiting diminished enzyme activity (CYP3A4*8 and the novel CYP3A4*27 allele, p.L475V). Relative to CYP3A4 wild-type patients, those carrying CYP3A4 defective variants had more severe neuropathy (2- and 1.3-fold higher risk of neuropathy for loss-of-function and missense variants, respectively, P = 0.045) and higher probability of neuropathy-induced paclitaxel treatment modifications (7- and 3-fold higher risk for loss-of-function and missense variants, respectively, P = 5.9 × 10(-5)). CONCLUSION This is the first description of a genetic marker associated with paclitaxel treatment modifications caused by neuropathy. CYP3A4 defective variants may provide a basis for paclitaxel treatment individualization.Grant Support This work was supported by projects from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness (grant number SAF2012–35779) and by grants from The Swedish Cancer Foundation, The Swedish Research Council, and Karolinska Institutet in Sweden. María Apell aniz-Ruiz is a predoctoral fellow of "la Caixa"/CNIO international PhD programme.S