2,023 research outputs found

    Evaluation of Frequency Dependent Equivalent Linear analysis

    Get PDF
    One dimensional equivalent linear site response analysis is widely used in practice due to the simplicity and ease of use. In the method, the dynamic soil properties are assumed to be independent of the loading frequency. To better simulate the nonlinear behavior, equivalent analysis methods that models the loading frequency dependence of the shear modulus and damping were developed. The backbone of the methods is the frequency-dependent shear strain curves. Various forms of the frequency-dependent shear strain curves were developed. However, the effect of the frequency - shear strain curves are not well known and documented. In this study, a series of frequency – strain curves were used to evaluate the accuracy of the frequency dependent equivalent linear analysis. Results show that the effect of the curves is significant and that the frequency dependent analysis does not always provide an improved estimate and can highly overestimate the amplification of the high frequency components of the ground motion. The degree of overestimation is dependent on the characteristics of the input ground motion and the soil profile. It is therefore concluded that the frequency dependent equivalent linear analysis should be used with caution and that standard equivalent linear analysis can be a more reliable option

    Multiplicity of positive solutions to a singular (p1,p2)(p_1,p_2)-Laplacian system with coupled integral boundary conditions

    Get PDF
    In this work, we investigate the existence and multiplicity results for positive solutions to a singular (p1,p2)(p_1,p_2)-Laplacian system with coupled integral boundary conditions and a parameter (μ,λ)R+3(\mu,\lambda) \in \mathbb{R}_+^3 . Using sub-super solutions method and fixed point index theorems, it is shown that there exists a continuous surface C\mathcal{C} which separates R+2×(0,)\mathbb{R}_+^2 \times (0,\infty) into two regions O1\mathcal{O}_1 and O2\mathcal{O}_2 such that the problem under consideration has two positive solutions for (μ,λ)O1,( \mu,\lambda) \in \mathcal{O}_1, at least one positive solution for (μ,λ)C( \mu,\lambda) \in \mathcal{C}, and no positive solutions for $( \mu,\lambda) \in \mathcal{O}_2.

    Effect of blood pressure and glycemic control on the plasma cell-free DNA in hemodialysis patients

    Get PDF
    AbstractBackgroundThe plasma levels of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are known to be elevated under inflammatory or apoptotic conditions. Increased cfDNA levels have been reported in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of cfDNA in HD patients.MethodsA total of 95 patients on HD were enrolled. We measured their predialysis cfDNA levels using real-time EIF2C1 gene sequence amplification and analyzed its association with certain clinical parameters.ResultsThe mean plasma cfDNA level in the HD patients was 3,884 ± 407 GE/mL, and the mean plasma cfDNA level in the control group was 1,420 ± 121 GE/mL (P < 0.05). Diabetic patients showed higher plasma cfDNA levels compared with nondiabetic patients (P < 0.01). Patients with cardiovascular complications also showed higher plasma cfDNA levels compared with those without cardiovascular complication (P < 0.05). In univariable analysis, the cfDNA level was associated with 3-month mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), white blood cell, serum albumin, creatinine (Cr), normalized protein catabolic rate in HD patients. In diabetic patients, it was significantly correlated with SBP, hemoglobin A1c, and serum albumin. In multivariate analysis, SBP was the independent determinant for the cfDNA level. In diabetic patients, cfDNA level was independently associated with hemoglobin A1c and SBP.ConclusionsIn patients with HD, cfDNA is elevated in diabetic patients and patients with cardiovascular diseases. Uncontrolled hypertension and poor glycemic control are independent determinants for the elevated cfDNA. Our data suggest that cfDNA might be a marker of vascular injury rather than proinflammatory condition in HD patients

    Risk stratification of symptomatic brain metastases by clinical and FDG PET parameters for selective use of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with extensive disease of small cell lung cancer

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To identify risk factors for developing symptomatic brain metastases and evaluate the impact of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) on brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS) in extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Materials and methods: Among 190 patients diagnosed with ED-SCLC who underwent FDG PET/CT and brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) prior to treatment, 53 (27.9%) received PCI while 137 (72.1%) did not. Prognostic index predicting a high risk of symptomatic brain metastases was calculated for the group without receiving PCI (observation group, n = 137) with Cox regression model. Results: Median follow-up time was 10.6 months. Multivariate Cox regression showed that the following three factors were associated with a high risk of symptomatic brain metastases: the presence of extrathoracic metastases (p = 0.004), hypermetabolism of bone marrow or spleen on FDG PET (p < 0.001), and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.018). PCI significantly improved BMFS in high-risk patients (1-year rate: 94.7% vs. 62.1%, p = 0.001), but not in low-risk patients (1-year rate: 100.0% vs. 87.7%, p = 0.943). However, PCI did not improve OS in patients at high risk for symptomatic brain metastases (1-year rate: 65.2% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.123). Conclusion: Three prognostic factors (the presence of extrathoracic metastases, hypermetabolism of bone marrow or spleen on FDG PET, and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) were associated with a high risk of symptomatic brain metastases in ED-SCLC. PCI was beneficial for patients at a high risk of symptomatic brain metastases in terms of BMFS, but not OS. Thus, selective use of PCI in ED-SCLC according to the risk stratification is recommended. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    corecore