375 research outputs found
Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline II: Detection Efficiency as Calculated in One Year of Data
The Kepler planet sample can only be used to reconstruct the underlying
planet occurrence rate if the detection efficiency of the Kepler pipeline is
known, here we present the results of a second experiment aimed at
characterising this detection efficiency. We inject simulated transiting planet
signals into the pixel data of ~10,000 targets, spanning one year of
observations, and process the pixels as normal. We compare the set of
detections made by the pipeline with the expectation from the set of simulated
planets, and construct a sensitivity curve of signal recovery as a function of
the signal-to-noise of the simulated transit signal train. The sensitivity
curve does not meet the hypothetical maximum detection efficiency, however it
is not as pessimistic as some of the published estimates of the detection
efficiency. For the FGK stars in our sample, the sensitivity curve is well fit
by a gamma function with the coefficients a = 4.35 and b = 1.05. We also find
that the pipeline algorithms recover the depths and periods of the injected
signals with very high fidelity, especially for periods longer than 10 days. We
perform a simplified occurrence rate calculation using the measured detection
efficiency compared to previous assumptions of the detection efficiency found
in the literature to demonstrate the systematic error introduced into the
resulting occurrence rates. The discrepancies in the calculated occurrence
rates may go some way towards reconciling some of the inconsistencies found in
the literature.Comment: 13 pages, 7 figures, 1 electronic table, accepted by Ap
Detection of Potential Transit Signals in the First Three Quarters of Kepler Mission Data
We present the results of a search for potential transit signals in the first
three quarters of photometry data acquired by the Kepler Mission. The targets
of the search include 151,722 stars which were observed over the full interval
and an additional 19,132 stars which were observed for only 1 or 2 quarters.
From this set of targets we find a total of 5,392 detections which meet the
Kepler detection criteria: those criteria are periodicity of the signal, an
acceptable signal-to-noise ratio, and a composition test which rejects spurious
detections which contain non-physical combinations of events. The detected
signals are dominated by events with relatively low signal-to-noise ratio and
by events with relatively short periods. The distribution of estimated transit
depths appears to peak in the range between 40 and 100 parts per million, with
a few detections down to fewer than 10 parts per million. The detected signals
are compared to a set of known transit events in the Kepler field of view which
were derived by a different method using a longer data interval; the comparison
shows that the current search correctly identified 88.1% of the known events. A
tabulation of the detected transit signals, examples which illustrate the
analysis and detection process, a discussion of future plans and open,
potentially fruitful, areas of further research are included
Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline. III. Completeness of the Q1-Q17 DR24 Planet Candidate Catalogue, with Important Caveats for Occurrence Rate Calculations
With each new version of the Kepler pipeline and resulting planet candidate
catalogue, an updated measurement of the underlying planet population can only
be recovered with an corresponding measurement of the Kepler pipeline detection
efficiency. Here, we present measurements of the sensitivity of the pipeline
(version 9.2) used to generate the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog
(Coughlin et al. 2016). We measure this by injecting simulated transiting
planets into the pixel-level data of 159,013 targets across the entire Kepler
focal plane, and examining the recovery rate. Unlike previous versions of the
Kepler pipeline, we find a strong period dependence in the measured detection
efficiency, with longer (>40 day) periods having a significantly lower
detectability than shorter periods, introduced in part by an incorrectly
implemented veto. Consequently, the sensitivity of the 9.2 pipeline cannot be
cast as a simple one-dimensional function of the signal strength of the
candidate planet signal as was possible for previous versions of the pipeline.
We report on the implications for occurrence rate calculations based on the
Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog and offer important caveats and
recommendations for performing such calculations. As before, we make available
the entire table of injected planet parameters and whether they were recovered
by the pipeline, enabling readers to derive the pipeline detection sensitivity
in the planet and/or stellar parameter space of their choice.Comment: 8 pages, 5 figures, full electronic version of Table 1 available at
the NASA Exoplanet Archive; accepted by ApJ May 2nd, 201
Terrestrial Planet Occurrence Rates for the Kepler GK Dwarf Sample
We measure planet occurrence rates using the planet candidates discovered by
the Q1-Q16 Kepler pipeline search. This study examines planet occurrence rates
for the Kepler GK dwarf target sample for planet radii, 0.75<Rp<2.5 Rearth, and
orbital periods, 50<Porb<300 days, with an emphasis on a thorough exploration
and identification of the most important sources of systematic uncertainties.
Integrating over this parameter space, we measure an occurrence rate of F=0.77
planets per star, with an allowed range of 0.3<F<1.9. The allowed range takes
into account both statistical and systematic uncertainties, and values of F
beyond the allowed range are significantly in disagreement with our analysis.
We generally find higher planet occurrence rates and a steeper increase in
planet occurrence rates towards small planets than previous studies of the
Kepler GK dwarf sample. Through extrapolation, we find that the one year
orbital period terrestrial planet occurrence rate, zeta_1=0.1, with an allowed
range of 0.01<zeta_1<2, where zeta_1 is defined as the number of planets per
star within 20% of the Rp and Porb of Earth. For G dwarf hosts, the zeta_1
parameter space is a subset of the larger eta_earth parameter space, thus
zeta_1 places a lower limit on eta_earth for G dwarf hosts. From our analysis,
we identify the leading sources of systematics impacting Kepler occurrence rate
determinations as: reliability of the planet candidate sample, planet radii,
pipeline completeness, and stellar parameters.Comment: 19 Pages, 17 Figures, Submitted ApJ. Python source to support Kepler
pipeline completeness estimates available at
http://github.com/christopherburke/KeplerPORTs
Recommended from our members
Kepler-4B: A Hot Neptune-Like Planet of A G0 Star Near Main-Sequence Turnoff
Early time-series photometry from NASA's Kepler spacecraft has revealed a planet transiting the star we term Kepler-4, at R.A. = 19(h)02(m)27.(s)68, delta = +50 degrees 08'08 '' 7. The planet has an orbital period of 3.213 days and shows transits with a relative depth of 0.87 x 10(-3) and a duration of about 3.95 hr. Radial velocity (RV) measurements from the Keck High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer show a reflex Doppler signal of 9.3(-1.9)(+1.1) m s(-1), consistent with a low-eccentricity orbit with the phase expected from the transits. Various tests show no evidence for any companion star near enough to affect the light curve or the RVs for this system. From a transit-based estimate of the host star's mean density, combined with analysis of high-resolution spectra, we infer that the host star is near turnoff from the main sequence, with estimated mass and radius of 1.223(-0.091)(+0.053) M(circle dot) and 1.487(-0.084)(+0.071) R(circle dot).We estimate the planet mass and radius to be {M(P), R(P)} = {24.5 +/- 3.8 M(circle plus), 3.99 +/- 0.21 R(circle plus)}. The planet's density is near 1.9 g cm(-3); it is thus slightly denser and more massive than Neptune, but about the same size.W. M. Keck FoundationNASA's Science Mission DirectorateAstronom
- …