Perioperative and long-term operative outcomes after surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: microvascular decompression vs percutaneous balloon ablation

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Objectives</p> <p>Numerous medical and surgical therapies have been utilized to treat the symptoms of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). This retrospective study compares patients undergoing either microvascular decompression or balloon ablation of the trigeminal ganglion and determines which produces the best long-term outcomes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A 10-year retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent microvascular decompression (MVD) or percutaneous balloon ablation (BA) surgery for TN. Demographic data, intraoperative variables, length of hospitalization and symptom improvement were assessed along with complications and recurrences of symptoms after surgery. Appropriate statistical comparisons were utilized to assess differences between the two surgical techniques.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>MVD patients were younger but were otherwise similar to BA patients. Intraoperatively, twice as many BA patients developed bradycardia compared to MVD patients. 75% of BA patients with bradycardia had an improvement of symptoms. Hospital stay was shorter in BA patients but overall improvement of symptoms was better with MVD. Postoperative complication rates were similar (21% vs 26%) between the BA and MVD groups.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>MVD produced better overall outcomes compared to BA and may be the procedure of choice for surgery to treat TN.</p

The effects of sedation on gastric emptying and intra-gastric meal distribution in critical illness

The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of sedation with morphine and midazolam (M&M) versus propofol on gastric emptying in critically ill patients.DesignDescriptive study.SettingMixed medical and surgical intensive care unit.PatientsThirty-six unselected, mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.InterventionsGastric scintigraphic data were analysed retrospectively according to whether patients were receiving M&M (n=20; 14M, 6F) or propofol (n=16; 7M, 9F). Measurements were performed over 4 h after administration of 100 ml of Ensure, labelled with 20 MBq Tc99m.Measurements and resultsGastric half-emptying time (t1/2) and total and regional (proximal and distal stomach) meal retention (%) were assessed. The median t1/2 of patients receiving M&M (153 (IQR: 72-434) min) was significantly longer than that of patients receiving propofol (58 (34-166) min, p=0.02). Total gastric retention was greater in patients receiving M&M compared to those receiving propofol (por=5% meal retention at 240 min than those treated with propofol (95% (19/20) vs. 56% (9/16); p=0.01). Changes in blood glucose concentrations during the study were similar in the two groups.ConclusionsIn critical illness, patients receiving M&M for sedation are more likely to have slow gastric emptying, and proximal meal retention than those receiving propofol. The apparent beneficial effects of propofol-based sedation need confirmation by a prospective randomised controlled study.Nam Q. Nguyen, Marianne J. Chapman, Robert J. Fraser, Laura K. Bryant, Carly Burgstad, Katrina Ching, Max Bellon and Richard H. Hollowa