41 research outputs found

    Locating the pseudogap closing point in cuprate superconductors: absence of entrant or reentrant behavior

    Full text link
    Current descriptions of the pseudogap in underdoped cuprates envision a doping-dependent transition line Tβˆ—(p)T^*(p) which descends monotonically towards zero just beyond optimal doping. There is much debate as to the location of the terminal point pβˆ—p^* where Tβˆ—(p)T^*(p) vanishes, whether or not there is a phase transition at Tβˆ—T^* and exactly how Tβˆ—(p)T^*(p) behaves below TcT_c within the superconducting dome. One perspective sees Tβˆ—(p)T^*(p) cutting the dome and continuing to descend monotonically to zero at pcritβ‰ˆ0.19p_{crit} \approx 0.19 holes/Cu βˆ’- referred to here as `entrant behavior'. Another perspective derived from photoemission studies is that Tβˆ—(p)T^*(p) intersects the dome near pcritβ‰ˆ0.23p_{crit} \approx 0.23 holes/Cu then turns back below TcT_c, falling to zero again around pcritβ‰ˆ0.19p_{crit} \approx 0.19 βˆ’- referred to here as `reentrant behavior'. By examining thermodynamic data for Bi2_2Sr2_2CaCu2_2O8+Ξ΄_{8+\delta} we show that neither entrant nor reentrant behavior is experimentally supported. Rather, pcritβ‰ˆ0.19p_{crit} \approx 0.19 sharply delimits the pseudogap regime and for p<0.19p < 0.19 the pseudogap is always present, independent of temperature. Similar results are found for Y0.8_{0.8}Ca0.2_{0.2}Ba2_2Cu3_3O7βˆ’Ξ΄_{7-\delta}. For both materials Tβˆ—(p)T^*(p) is not a temperature but a crossover scale, β‰ˆEβˆ—(p)/2kB\approx E^*(p)/2k_B, reflecting instead the underlying pseudogap energy Eβˆ—(p)E^*(p) which vanishes as pβ†’0.19p \rightarrow 0.19.Comment: 20 Pages, 9 Figures, in press Phys. Rev.

    Field-dependent specific heat of the canonical underdoped cuprate superconductor [Formula: see text].

    Get PDF
    The cuprate superconductor [Formula: see text], in comparison with most other cuprates, has a stable stoichiometry, is largely free of defects and may be regarded as the canonical underdoped cuprate, displaying marked pseudogap behaviour and an associated distinct weakening of superconducting properties. This cuprate 'pseudogap' manifests as a partial gap in the electronic density of states at the Fermi level and is observed in most spectroscopic properties. After several decades of intensive study it is widely believed that the pseudogap closes, mean-field like, near a characteristic temperature, [Formula: see text], which rises with decreasing hole concentration, p. Here, we report extensive field-dependent electronic specific heat studies on [Formula: see text] up to an unprecedented 400 K and show unequivocally that the pseudogap never closes, remaining open to at least 400 K where [Formula: see text] is typically presumed to be about 150 K. We show from the NMR Knight shift and the electronic entropy that the Wilson ratio is numerically consistent with a weakly-interacting Fermion system for the near-nodal states. And, from the field-dependent specific heat, we characterise the impact of fluctuations and impurity scattering on the thermodynamic properties

    Relevance of magnetism to cuprate superconductivity: Lanthanides versus charge-compensated cuprates

    Full text link
    We address what seemed to be a contradiction between the lanthanide series REBa2_2Cu3_3Oy_y (RE123) and the charge-compensated series (Cax_{x}La1βˆ’x_{1-x})(Ba1.75βˆ’x_{1.75-x}La0.25+x_{0.25+x} )Cu3_{3}Oy_{y} (CLBLCO) regarding the superexchange (JJ) dependence of the maximum superconductivity (SC) critical temperature Tcmax(J)T_c^{max}(J); RE and xx are implicit variables. This is done by measuring the N\'{e}el temperature and the temperature dependence of the magnetic order parameter for RE=Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Yb, Y, and for Y(BaSr)Cu3_3Oy_y, at various very light dopings. The doping is determined by thermopower, and the magnetic properties by muon spin rotation. We find that the normalized-temperature dependence of the order parameter is identical for all RE123 in the undoped limit (with the exception of Gd123) implying identical out-of-plane magnetic coupling. The extrapolation of TNT_N to zero doping suggests that, despite the variations in ionic radii, JJ varies too weakly in this system to test the relation between SC and magnetism. This stands in contrast to CLBLCO where both TcmaxT_c^{max} and TNmaxT_N^{max} vary considerably in the undoped limit, and a positive correlation between the two quantities was observed.Comment: 6 pages, 5 figure

    Muon spin rotation and infrared spectroscopy study of magnetism and superconductivity in {\mathrm{Ba}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{K}}_{x}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{As}}_{2}

    Get PDF
    Using muon spin rotation and infrared spectroscopy, we study the relation between magnetism and superconductivity in Ba1βˆ’xKxFe2As2 single crystals from the underdoped to the slightly overdoped regime. We find that the Fe magnetic moment is only moderately suppressed in most of the underdoped region where it decreases more slowly than the NΓ©el temperature TN. This applies for both the total Fe moment obtained from muon spin rotation and for the itinerant component that is deduced from the spectral weight of the spin-density-wave pair-breaking peak in the infrared response. In the moderately underdoped region, superconducting and static magnetic orders coexist on the nanoscale and compete for the same electronic states. The static magnetic moment disappears rather sharply near optimal doping, however, in the slightly overdoped region there is still an enhancement or slowing down of spin fluctuations in the superconducting state. Similar to the gap magnitude reported from specific-heat measurements, the superconducting condensate density is nearly constant in the optimally and slightly overdoped region, but exhibits a rather pronounced decrease on the underdoped side. Several of these observations are similar to the phenomenology in the electron-doped counterpart Ba(Fe1βˆ’yCoy)2As2
    corecore