27 research outputs found
Grandpa Bulbrook
A series of platinumÂ(II) complexes with the formulas
PtÂ(diimine)Â(pip<sub>2</sub>NCNH<sub>2</sub>)Â(L)<sup>2+</sup> [pip<sub>2</sub>NCNH<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> = 2,6-bisÂ(piperidiniummethyl)Âphenyl
cation; L
= Cl, Br, I, NCS, OCN, and NO<sub>2</sub>; diimine = 1,10-phenanthroline
(phen), 5-nitro-1,10-phenanthroline (NO<sub>2</sub>phen), and 5,5′-ditrifluoromethyl-2,2′-bipyridine
(dtfmbpy)] were prepared by the treatment of PtÂ(pip<sub>2</sub>NCN)ÂCl
with a silverÂ(I) salt followed by the addition of the diimine and
halide/pseudohalide under acidic conditions. Crystallographic data
as well as <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra establish that the metal center
is bonded to a bidentate phenanthroline and a monodentate halide/pseudohalide.
The pip<sub>2</sub>NCNH<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> ligand with protonated
piperidyl groups is monodentate and bonded to the platinum through
the phenyl ring. Structural and spectroscopic data indicate that the
halide/pseudohalide group (L<sup>–</sup>) and the metal center
in PtÂ(phen)Â(pip<sub>2</sub>NCNH<sub>2</sub>)Â(L)<sup>2+</sup> behave
as Brønsted bases, forming intramolecular NH···L/NH···Pt
interactions involving the piperidinium groups. A close examination
of the 10 structures reported here reveals linear correlations between
N–H···Pt/L angles and H···Pt/L
distances. In most cases, the N–H bond is directed toward the
Pt–L bond, thereby giving the appearance that the proton bridges
the Pt and L groups. In contrast to observations for PtÂ(tpy)Â(pip<sub>2</sub>NCN)<sup>+</sup> (tpy = 2,2′;6′,2″-terpyridine),
the electrochemical oxidation of deprotonated adducts, PtÂ(diimine)Â(L)Â(pip<sub>2</sub>NCN), is chemically and electrochemically irreversible
Cobalt POCOP Pincer Complexes via Ligand C–H Bond Activation with Co<sub>2</sub>(CO)<sub>8</sub>: Catalytic Activity for Hydrosilylation of Aldehydes in an Open vs a Closed System
A series of cobalt
POCOP pincer complexes with the formulas {2,6-(<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>-4-R′-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>2</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CO)<sub>2</sub> (R′ = H (<b>1a</b>), NMe<sub>2</sub> (<b>1b</b>), OMe (<b>1c</b>), CO<sub>2</sub>Me
(<b>1d</b>)), {2,6-(Ph<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CO)<sub>2</sub> (<b>1e</b>), and {2,6-(<sup>t</sup>Bu<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CO)
(<b>2f</b>) have been synthesized through C–H bond activation
of the corresponding pincer ligands with Co<sub>2</sub>(CO)<sub>8</sub>. These complexes have been demonstrated to catalyze the hydrosilylation
of PhCHO with (EtO)<sub>3</sub>SiH, which exhibits an induction period
and the decreasing reactivity order <b>1b</b> > <b>1c</b> > <b>1a</b> > <b>1d</b> > <b>1e</b>.
The catalytic
protocol can be applied to various aldehydes with turnover numbers
of up to 300. The CO ligands in the dicarbonyl complexes have been
shown to exchange with <sup>13</sup>CO at room temperature and partially
dissociate from cobalt at high temperatures. Substitution of CO by <i>tert</i>-butyl isocyanide has been accomplished with <b>1a</b> at 50–80 °C, resulting in the formation of {2,6-(<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CN<sup>t</sup>Bu)Â(CO) (<b>3a</b>) and {2,6-(<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CN<sup>t</sup>Bu)<sub>2</sub> (<b>4a</b>). The catalytic reactions are more efficient
when they are carried out in an open system or if the catalysts are
preactivated by the aldehydes. The structures of <b>1a</b>–<b>e</b>, <b>3a</b>, and <b>4a</b> have been studied
by X-ray crystallography
Configurational Stability and Stereochemistry of P‑Stereogenic Nickel POCOP-Pincer Complexes
The P-stereogenic
nickel complex {2,6-[(<i>t</i>-Bu)Â(Ph)ÂPO]<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂNiCl (<b>2</b>) has been
synthesized via cyclometalation of the POCOP-pincer ligand 1,3-[(<i>t</i>-Bu)Â(Ph)ÂPO]<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub> (<b>1</b>) with NiCl<sub>2</sub>. The initially isolated <b>2</b> consists of a 1:1 mixture of racemic and meso isomers that are separable
through repeated crystallization and is configurationally stable even
at 110 °C. Upon mixing with <i>t</i>-BuOK, the meso
isomer (<b>2-</b><i><b>meso</b></i>) displays
a higher ligand substitution rate than the racemic isomer (<b>2-</b><i><b>rac</b></i>), likely because its nickel center
is sterically more accessible. Complex <b>2</b>, as either pure <b>2-</b><i><b>rac</b></i> or a <b>2-</b><i><b>rac</b></i>/<b>2-</b><i><b>meso</b></i> mixture, can be converted to the nickel triflate complex
{2,6-[(<i>t</i>-Bu)Â(Ph)ÂPO]<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂNiOTf (<b>3</b>) or the nickel formate complex {2,6-[(<i>t</i>-Bu)Â(Ph)ÂPO]<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂNiOCHO
(<b>7</b>) without epimerization at the phosphorus centers.
Under a dynamic vacuum at 90 °C, decarboxylation of <b>7-</b><i><b>meso</b></i> is faster than that of <b>7-</b><i><b>rac</b></i>, suggesting that in the transition
state the formato hydrogen approaches the nickel center from the axial
site rather than the equatorial site. The structure of <b>2-</b><i><b>rac</b></i> has been studied by X-ray crystallography
Cobalt POCOP Pincer Complexes via Ligand C–H Bond Activation with Co<sub>2</sub>(CO)<sub>8</sub>: Catalytic Activity for Hydrosilylation of Aldehydes in an Open vs a Closed System
A series of cobalt
POCOP pincer complexes with the formulas {2,6-(<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>-4-R′-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>2</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CO)<sub>2</sub> (R′ = H (<b>1a</b>), NMe<sub>2</sub> (<b>1b</b>), OMe (<b>1c</b>), CO<sub>2</sub>Me
(<b>1d</b>)), {2,6-(Ph<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CO)<sub>2</sub> (<b>1e</b>), and {2,6-(<sup>t</sup>Bu<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CO)
(<b>2f</b>) have been synthesized through C–H bond activation
of the corresponding pincer ligands with Co<sub>2</sub>(CO)<sub>8</sub>. These complexes have been demonstrated to catalyze the hydrosilylation
of PhCHO with (EtO)<sub>3</sub>SiH, which exhibits an induction period
and the decreasing reactivity order <b>1b</b> > <b>1c</b> > <b>1a</b> > <b>1d</b> > <b>1e</b>.
The catalytic
protocol can be applied to various aldehydes with turnover numbers
of up to 300. The CO ligands in the dicarbonyl complexes have been
shown to exchange with <sup>13</sup>CO at room temperature and partially
dissociate from cobalt at high temperatures. Substitution of CO by <i>tert</i>-butyl isocyanide has been accomplished with <b>1a</b> at 50–80 °C, resulting in the formation of {2,6-(<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CN<sup>t</sup>Bu)Â(CO) (<b>3a</b>) and {2,6-(<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>}ÂCoÂ(CN<sup>t</sup>Bu)<sub>2</sub> (<b>4a</b>). The catalytic reactions are more efficient
when they are carried out in an open system or if the catalysts are
preactivated by the aldehydes. The structures of <b>1a</b>–<b>e</b>, <b>3a</b>, and <b>4a</b> have been studied
by X-ray crystallography
Mechanistic Studies of Ammonia Borane Dehydrogenation Catalyzed by Iron Pincer Complexes
A series
of iron bisÂ(phosphinite) pincer complexes with the formula
of [2,6-(<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>]ÂFeÂ(PMe<sub>2</sub>R)<sub>2</sub>H (R = Me, <b>1</b>; R = Ph, <b>2</b>) or [2,6-(<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>PO)<sub>2</sub>-4-(MeO)ÂC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>2</sub>]ÂFeÂ(PMe<sub>2</sub>Ph)<sub>2</sub>H (<b>3</b>) have been tested for catalytic dehydrogenation
of ammonia borane (AB). At 60 °C, complexes <b>1</b>–<b>3</b> release 2.3–2.5 equiv of H<sub>2</sub> per AB in
24 h. Among the three iron catalysts, <b>3</b> exhibits the
highest activity in terms of both the rate and the extent of H<sub>2</sub> release. The initial rate for the dehydrogenation of AB catalyzed
by <b>3</b> is first order in <b>3</b> and zero order
in AB. The kinetic isotope effect (KIE) observed for doubly labeled
AB (<i>k</i><sub>NH3BH3</sub>/<i>k</i><sub>ND3BD3</sub> = 3.7) is the product of individual KIEs (<i>k</i><sub>NH3BH3</sub>/<i>k</i><sub>ND3BH3</sub> = 2.0 and <i>k</i><sub>NH3BH3</sub>/<i>k</i><sub>NH3BD3</sub> =
1.7), suggesting that B–H and N–H bonds are simultaneously
broken during the rate-determining step. NMR studies support that
the catalytically active species is an AB-bound iron complex formed
by displacing <i>trans</i> PMe<sub>3</sub> or PMe<sub>2</sub>Ph (relative to the hydride) by AB. Loss of NH<sub>3</sub> from the
AB-bound iron species as well as catalyst degradation contributes
to the decreased rate of H<sub>2</sub> release at the late stage of
the dehydrogenation reaction
Cooperative Iron–Oxygen–Copper Catalysis in the Reduction of Benzaldehyde under Water-Gas Shift Reaction Conditions
Two
Fe–Cu heterobimetallic complexes have been synthesized
from the reactions of the (cyclopentadienone)iron complexes {2,5-(EMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>-3,4-(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(η<sup>4</sup>-C<sub>4</sub>Cî—»O)}ÂFeÂ(CO)<sub>3</sub> (E = Si, <b>1a</b>; E = C, <b>1b</b>) with (IPr)ÂCuOH (IPr = 1,3-bisÂ(diisopropylphenyl)Âimidazol-2-ylidene).
X-ray crystallographic studies show that these complexes adopt a structure
featuring a bridging hydride which can be described by the formula
{2,5-(EMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>-3,4-(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(η<sup>4</sup>-C<sub>4</sub>Cî—»O)}Â(CO)<sub>2</sub>FeÂ(μ-H)ÂCuÂ(IPr)
(E = Si, <b>4a</b>′; E = C, <b>4b</b>′).
When they are dissolved in toluene, THF, or cyclohexane, these complexes
form a rapidly equilibrated isomeric mixture of <b>4a</b>′
or <b>4b</b>′ and the terminal iron hydride {2,5-(EMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>-3,4-(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>4</sub>COCuIPr)}ÂFeÂ(CO)<sub>2</sub>H (E = Si, <b>4a</b>; E = C, <b>4b</b>). The solution structure for the
Me<sub>3</sub>Si derivative is dominated by <b>4a</b>. Both <b>4a</b> and <b>4b/4b</b>′ react with HCO<sub>2</sub>H to form a monometallic iron hydride and (IPr)ÂCuOCHO. They also
undergo displacement of (IPr)ÂCuH by CO. The heterobimetallic complexes
are effective catalysts for the reduction of PhCHO under water-gas
shift conditions; <b>4a</b> exhibits higher activity than <b>4b/4b</b>′. Control experiments with monometallic species
establish the cooperativity between a bifunctional iron fragment and
a copper fragment during the catalytic reaction. A mechanistic investigation
including stoichiometric reactions, various control experiments, and
labeling studies has led to the proposal of two different catalytic
cycles
Cooperative Iron–Oxygen–Copper Catalysis in the Reduction of Benzaldehyde under Water-Gas Shift Reaction Conditions
Two
Fe–Cu heterobimetallic complexes have been synthesized
from the reactions of the (cyclopentadienone)iron complexes {2,5-(EMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>-3,4-(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(η<sup>4</sup>-C<sub>4</sub>Cî—»O)}ÂFeÂ(CO)<sub>3</sub> (E = Si, <b>1a</b>; E = C, <b>1b</b>) with (IPr)ÂCuOH (IPr = 1,3-bisÂ(diisopropylphenyl)Âimidazol-2-ylidene).
X-ray crystallographic studies show that these complexes adopt a structure
featuring a bridging hydride which can be described by the formula
{2,5-(EMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>-3,4-(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(η<sup>4</sup>-C<sub>4</sub>Cî—»O)}Â(CO)<sub>2</sub>FeÂ(μ-H)ÂCuÂ(IPr)
(E = Si, <b>4a</b>′; E = C, <b>4b</b>′).
When they are dissolved in toluene, THF, or cyclohexane, these complexes
form a rapidly equilibrated isomeric mixture of <b>4a</b>′
or <b>4b</b>′ and the terminal iron hydride {2,5-(EMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>-3,4-(CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>4</sub>COCuIPr)}ÂFeÂ(CO)<sub>2</sub>H (E = Si, <b>4a</b>; E = C, <b>4b</b>). The solution structure for the
Me<sub>3</sub>Si derivative is dominated by <b>4a</b>. Both <b>4a</b> and <b>4b/4b</b>′ react with HCO<sub>2</sub>H to form a monometallic iron hydride and (IPr)ÂCuOCHO. They also
undergo displacement of (IPr)ÂCuH by CO. The heterobimetallic complexes
are effective catalysts for the reduction of PhCHO under water-gas
shift conditions; <b>4a</b> exhibits higher activity than <b>4b/4b</b>′. Control experiments with monometallic species
establish the cooperativity between a bifunctional iron fragment and
a copper fragment during the catalytic reaction. A mechanistic investigation
including stoichiometric reactions, various control experiments, and
labeling studies has led to the proposal of two different catalytic
cycles
Roles of Hydrogen Bonding in Proton Transfer to κ<sup>P</sup>,κ<sup>N</sup>,κ<sup>P</sup>‑N(CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>P<i><sup>i</sup></i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>‑Ligated Nickel Pincer Complexes
The
nickel PNP pincer complex (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiPh (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP =
κ<sup>P</sup>,κ<sup>N</sup>,κ<sup>P</sup>-NÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>P<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>) was prepared by reacting (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiBr with PhMgCl or deprotonating [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiPh]Y (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P = κ<sup>P</sup>,κ<sup>N</sup>,κ<sup>P</sup>-HNÂ(CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>P<i><sup>i</sup></i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>; Y = Br, PF<sub>6</sub>) with KO<i><sup>t</sup></i>Bu. The byproducts of
the PhMgCl reaction were identified as [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiPh]Br and (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP′)ÂNiPh (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP′ = κ<sup>P</sup>,κ<sup>N</sup>,κ<sup>P</sup>-NÂ(CHî—»CHP<sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>)Â(CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>P<i><sup>i</sup></i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)). The methyl analog (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiMe was synthesized from the reaction of (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiBr with MeLi, although it was contaminated
with (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP′)ÂNiMe due
to ligand oxidation. Protonation of (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiX (X = Br, Ph, Me) with various acids, such as HCl,
water, and MeOH, was studied in C<sub>6</sub>D<sub>6</sub>. Nitrogen
protonation was shown to be the most favorable process, producing
a cationic species [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiX]<sup>+</sup> with the NH moiety hydrogen-bonded to the
conjugate base (i.e., Cl<sup>–</sup>, HO<sup>–</sup>, or MeO<sup>–</sup>). Protonation of the Ni–C bond
was observed at room temperature with (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiMe, whereas at 70 °C with (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiPh, both resulting in [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiCl]Cl as the final product.
Protonation of (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiBr
was complicated by site exchange between Br<sup>–</sup> and
the conjugate base and by the degradation of the pincer complexes.
Indene, which lacks hydrogen-bonding capability, was unable to protonate
(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiPh and (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiMe, despite being more acidic
than water and MeOH. Neutral and cationic nickel pincer complexes
involved in this study, including (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP′)ÂNiBr, (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiPh, (<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP′)ÂNiPh,
(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PNP)ÂNiMe, [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiPh]Y (Y = Br, PF<sub>6</sub>, BPh<sub>4</sub>), [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiPh]<sub>2</sub>[NiCl<sub>4</sub>], [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiMe]Y (Y = Cl, Br, BPh<sub>4</sub>), [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiBr]ÂBr, and [(<sup><sup><i>i</i></sup>Pr</sup>PN<sup>H</sup>P)ÂNiCl]ÂCl, were characterized by X-ray crystallography
Ruthenium Bis-diimine Complexes with a Chelating Thioether Ligand: Delineating 1,10-Phenanthrolinyl and 2,2′-Bipyridyl Ligand Substituent Effects
Despite the high π-acidity
of thioether donors, rutheniumÂ(II)
complexes with a bidentate 1,2-bisÂ(phenylÂthio)Âethane
(dpte) ligand and two chelating diimine ligands (i.e., RuÂ(diimine)<sub>2</sub>Â(dpte)<sup>2+</sup>) exhibit room-temperature fluid
solution emission originating from a lowest MLCT excited state (diimine
= 2,2′-bipyridine, 5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine
4,4′-di-<i>tert</i>-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine,
1,10-phenanthroline, 5-methyl-1,10-phenanthroline, 5-chloro-1,10-phenanthroline,
5-bromo-1,10-phenanthroline, 5-nitro-1,10-phenanthroline, 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline,
and 3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline). Crystal structures show
that the complexes form 2 of the 12 possible conformational/configurational
isomers, as well as nonstatistical distributions of geometric isomers;
there also are short intramolecular π–π interactions
between the diimine ligands and dpte phenyl groups. The photoinduced
solvolysis product, [RuÂ(diimine)<sub>2</sub>Â(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>]Â(PF<sub>6</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, for one complex
in acetonitrile also was characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
Variations in the MLCT energies and RuÂ(III/II) redox couple, <i>E</i>°′(Ru<sup>3+/2+</sup>), can be understood in
terms of the influence of the donor properties of the ligands on the
mainly metal-based HOMO and mainly diimine ligand-based LUMO. <i>E</i>°′(Ru<sup>3+/2+</sup>) also is quantitatively
described using a summative Hammett parameter (σ<sub>T</sub>), as well as using Lever’s electrochemical parameters (<i>E</i><sub>L</sub>). Recommended parametrizations
for substituted 2,2′-bipyridyl and 1,10-phenanthrolinyl ligands
were derived from analysis of correlations of <i>E</i>°′(Ru<sup>3+/2+</sup>) for 99 homo- and heteroleptic rutheniumÂ(II) tris-diimine
complexes. This analysis reveals that variations in <i>E</i>°′(Ru<sup>3+/2+</sup>) due to substituents at the 4-
and 4′-positions of bipyridyl ligands and 4- and 7-positions
of phenanthrolinyl ligands are significantly more strongly correlated
with σ<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup> than either σ<sub>m</sub> or σ<sub>p</sub>. Substituents at the 5- and 6-positions of
phenanthrolinyl ligands are best described by σ<sub>m</sub> and
have effects comparable to those of substituents at the 3- and 8-positions.
Correlations of <i>E</i><sub>L</sub> with σ<sub>T</sub> for 1,10-phenanthrolinyl and 2,2′-bipyridyl ligands show
similar results, except that σ<sub>p</sub> and σ<sub>p</sub><sup>+</sup> are almost equally effective in describing the influence
of substituents at the 4- and 4′-positions of bipyridyl ligands.
MLCT energies and d<sup>5</sup>/d<sup>6</sup>-electron redox couples
of the complexes with 5-substituted 1,10-phenanthroline exhibit correlations
with values for other d<sup>6</sup>-electron metal complexes that
can be rationalized in terms of the relative number of diimine ligands
and substituents
Neodymium(III) Complexes of Dialkylphosphoric and Dialkylphosphonic Acids Relevant to Liquid–Liquid Extraction Systems
The
complexes formed during the extraction of neodymiumÂ(III) into hydrophobic
solvents containing acidic organophosphorus extractants were probed
by single-crystal X-ray diffractometry, visible spectrophotometry,
and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The crystal structure
of the compound NdÂ(DMP)<sub>3</sub> (<b>1</b>, DMP = dimethyl
phosphate) revealed a polymeric arrangement in which each NdÂ(III)
center is surrounded by six DMP oxygen atoms in a pseudo-octahedral
environment. Adjacent NdÂ(III) ions are bridged by (MeO)<sub>2</sub>POO<sup>–</sup> anions, forming the polymeric network. The
diffuse reflectance visible spectrum of <b>1</b> is nearly identical
to that of the solid that is formed when an <i>n-</i>dodecane
solution of diÂ(2-ethylhexyl)Âphosphoric acid (HA) is saturated with
NdÂ(III), indicating a similar coordination environment around the
Nd center in the NdA<sub>3</sub> solid. The visible spectrum of the
HA solution fully loaded with NdÂ(III) is very similar to that of the
NdA<sub>3</sub> material, both displaying hypersensitive bands characteristic
of an pseudo-octahedral coordination environment around Nd. These
spectral characteristics persisted across a wide range of organic
Nd concentrations, suggesting that the pseudo-octahedral coordination
environment is maintained from dilute to saturated conditions