28 research outputs found

    Failed immune responses across multiple pathologies share pan-tumor and circulating lymphocytic targets

    Get PDF
    Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are widely associated with positive outcomes, yet carry key indicators of a systemic failed immune response against unresolved cancer. Cancer immunotherapies can reverse their tolerance phenotypes while preserving tumor reactivity and neoantigen specificity shared with circulating immune cells. We performed comprehensive transcriptomic analyses to identify gene signatures common to circulating and TILs in the context of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Modulated genes also associated with disease outcome were validated in other cancer types. Through comprehensive bioinformatics analyses, we identified practical diagnostic markers and actionable targets of the failed immune response. On circulating lymphocytes, 3 genes (LEF1, FASLG, and MMP9) could efficiently stratify patients from healthy control donors. From their associations with resistance to cancer immunotherapies and microbial infections, we uncovered not only pan-cancer, but pan-pathology, failed immune response profiles. A prominent lymphocytic matrix metallopeptidase cell migration pathway is central to a panoply of diseases and tumor immunogenicity, correlates with multi-cancer recurrence, and identifies a feasible noninvasive approach to pan-pathology diagnoses. The differentially expressed genes we have identified warrant future investigation into the development of their potential in noninvasive precision diagnostics and precision pan-disease immunotherapeutics. - 2019, American Society for Clinical Investigation.We thank all study participants and patients; The Cancer Genome Atlas; Mathieu Latour and Roula Albadine and supporting staff of the CHUM pathology department; Manon de Ladurantaye and Anne-Marie Mes-Masson from the CRCHUM for RNA quality profiling, Geneviève Cormier and Fred Saad from the CRCHUM for drawing blood from control donors; Gilles Corbeil of the CRCHUM genomics department for RNA quality testing and microarray profiling; Francois Harvey of the CRCHUM bioinformatics department; Peter Graf and Patrick Sabourin from Affymetrix for providing reagents and technical assistance; Zeeshan Farroq and Ofir Goldberger from Fluidigm; Erika Diaz from StemCell; Andrew Mouland from McGill University; Simon Turcotte from University of Montreal; and Sascha Ring from Biostars for their advice. This work was partially performed at the Institut du Cancer de Montréal CRCHUM and University of Montreal, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. This work was supported by a Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute grant (CCSRI) (702036, to RL and IJ) and a Biomedical Research Grant from the Kidney Foundation of Canada (KFOC130019 to RL). RL is supported by the Quebec Cell, Tissue and Gene Therapy Network—ThéCell (a thematic network supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec–Santé [FRQS]), the FRQS, and the Immunotherapy Network (iTNT) from the Terry Fox Research Institute (TFRI), A. Monette is supported by Mitacs, Merck, l’Institut du cancer de Montréal (ICM), the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, and the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research. NAB is supported by the FRQS post-doctoral award and Qatar University. JBL is supported by l’Institut du Cancer de Montréal. JPR holds the Louis Lowenstein Chair, McGill University. DEK is supported by an FRQS Research Scholar Award (grant 31035), CIHR 377124, NHLBI RO1-HL-092565, and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) (grant 31756). IJ and computational analysis were supported by the Canada Research Chair Program (CRC) (grant 225404), Ontario Research Fund (grant 34876), the Natural Sciences Research Council (NSERC) (grant 203475), the CFI (grants 203373 and 30865), the Krembil Foundation, and IBM.Scopu

    IgG4-related disease and prostate cancer: A case report and review of the literature

    No full text
    We present a case of a patient with recurrent prostate cancer after treatment for favorable intermediate risk cancer. There was an exceptionally steep increase in PSA from <0.5 to 130ng/mL in 27 months accompanied with the development of bone metastasis. The PSA increase was unexpected. We suspect that this unusual development of metastases must have been caused by an impairment of the immune system caused by his IgG4 disease, and this may have allowed residual prostate cancer cells in the prostate to spread quickly. The influence of IgG4 on cancer is debated

    High Levels of MFG-E8 Confer a Good Prognosis in Prostate and Renal Cancer Patients

    No full text
    Milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor-8 (MFG-E8) is a glycoprotein secreted by different cell types, including apoptotic cells and activated macrophages. MFG-E8 is highly expressed in a variety of cancers and is classically associated with tumor growth and poor patient prognosis through reprogramming of macrophages into the pro-tumoral/pro-angiogenic M2 phenotype. To date, correlations between levels of MFG-E8 and patient survival in prostate and renal cancers remain unclear. Here, we quantified MFG-E8 and CD68/CD206 expression by immunofluorescence staining in tissue microarrays constructed from renal (n = 190) and prostate (n = 274) cancer patient specimens. Percentages of MFG-E8-positive surface area were assessed in each patient core and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed accordingly. We found that MFG-E8 was expressed more abundantly in malignant regions of prostate tissue and papillary renal cell carcinoma but was also increased in the normal adjacent regions in clear cell renal carcinoma. In addition, M2 tumor-associated macrophage staining was increased in the normal adjacent tissues compared to the malignant areas in renal cancer patients. Overall, high tissue expression of MFG-E8 was associated with less disease progression and better survival in prostate and renal cancer patients. Our observations provide new insights into tumoral MFG-E8 content and macrophage reprogramming in cancer

    Describing perspectives of health care professionals on active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer

    No full text
    Background: Over the last decade, active surveillance has proven to be a safe approach for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Although active surveillance presents several advantages for both patients and the health care system, all eligible patients do not adopt this approach. Our goal was to evaluate the factors that influence physicians to recommend active surveillance and the barriers that impact adherence to this approach. Methods: Focus groups (n = 5) were held with physicians who provided care for men with low-risk prostate cancer and had engaged in conversations with men and their families about active surveillance. The experience of health care professionals (HCPs) was captured to understand their decisions in proposing active surveillance and to reveal the barriers and facilitators that affect the adherence to this approach. A content analysis was performed on the verbatim transcripts from the sessions. Results: Although physicians agreed that active surveillance is a suitable approach for low-risk prostate cancer patients, they were concerned about the rapidly evolving and non-standardized guidelines for patient follow-up. They pointed out the need for additional tools to appropriately identify proper patients for whom active surveillance is the best option. Urologists and radiation-oncologists were keen to collaborate with each other, but the role of general practitioner remained controversial once patients were referred to a specialist. Conclusions: Integration of more reliable tools and/or markers in addition to more specific guidelines for patient follow-up would increase the confidence of both patients and physicians in the choice of active surveillance.Other UBCNon UBCReviewedFacult
    corecore