Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States

Background The Orphan Drug Act (1983) established several incentives to encourage the development of orphan drugs (ODs) to treat rare diseases and conditions. This study analyzed the characteristics of OD designations, approvals, sponsors, and evaluated the effective patent and market exclusivity life of orphan new molecular entities (NMEs) approved in the US between 1983 and 2007. Methods Primary data sources were the FDA Orange Book, the FDA Office of Orphan Drugs Development, and the US Patent and Trademark Office. Data included all orphan designations and approvals listed by the FDA and all NMEs approved by the FDA during the study period. Results The FDA listed 1,793 orphan designations and 322 approvals between 1983 and 2007. Cancer was the main group of diseases targeted for orphan approvals. Eighty-three companies concentrated 67.7% of the total orphan NMEs approvals. The average time from orphan designation to FDA approval was 4.0 ± 3.3 years (mean ± standard deviation). The average maximum effective patent and market exclusivity life was 11.7 ± 5.0 years for orphan NME. OD market exclusivity increased the average maximum effective patent and market exclusivity life of ODs by 0.8 years. Conclusion Public programs, federal regulations, and policies support orphan drugs R&D. Grants, research design support, FDA fee waivers, tax incentives, and orphan drug market exclusivity are the main incentives for orphan drug R&D. Although the 7-year orphan drug market exclusivity provision had a positive yet relatively modest overall effect on effective patent and market exclusivity life, economic incentives and public support mechanisms provide a platform for continued orphan drug development for a highly specialized market

Impact of a gene expression classifier on the long-term management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

<p><b>Objectives</b>: The gene expression classifier (GEC, Afirma<a href="#FN0001" target="_blank"></a>) reclassifies as molecularly benign approximately one half of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies with an initial indeterminate cytopathology diagnosis, facilitating clinical monitoring in lieu of diagnostic thyroid surgery. This study evaluated the long-term management patterns and thyroid surgery rates of GEC benign patients compared to a control group of cytopathology benign patients and also described the costs of thyroid surgery. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study used laboratory test results linked to payer medical claims data. Patients who underwent FNA biopsy between 1 January 2011 and 31 July 2013 were selected. GEC benign patients were matched 1:3 to cytopathology benign patients on biopsy year, gender, nodule size and age. Outcomes measured included thyroid-related follow-up clinic visits, ultrasound examinations and surgeries. <b>Results</b>: Out of 2059 patients, matched groups consisting of 201 GEC benign patients and 603 cytopathology benign patients were evaluated over an average follow-up of 20 months. The proportions of GEC benign and cytopathology benign patients that underwent thyroid surgery (11.4% versus 10.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.594), and received a follow-up ultrasound exam (60.2% versus 61.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.706), respectively, were not significantly different. Average thyroid-related medical cost for the surgical episode and during 6 months following surgery were $10,432.00 (SD$8301) and $10,939.00 (SD$9656) respectively. <b>Limitations</b>: The study cohort included only patients whose diagnostic laboratory test results and administrative claims data were uniquely identifiable and could be linked on multiple identifiers; the rigorous matching and patient selection algorithms utilized improved the robustness and internal validity of the study. Claims were used as a proxy for clinical utilization without chart review confirmation. <b>Conclusion</b>: Patients with GEC and cytopathology benign diagnoses were managed similarly. The majority of patients in both groups did not undergo surgery and were managed with usual care, consisting of clinical follow-up and ultrasound exams.</p