9 research outputs found
A Textual Analysis of the Influence of \u3cem\u3eMcIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission\u3c/em\u3e in Cases Involving Anonymous Online Commenters
All the Rumors are True: Verification, Actual Malice, and Celebrity Gossip
More than half of Americans get their news from social media. These spaces – social media platforms, video and audio recommender systems, social news and gossip boards – have their own fact-checking and editorial cultures that, although not the exact same as those found in newsrooms, offer similar controls for the distribution of information. While imperfect, just like the controls of traditional media, these fact-checking cultures may offer a response to recent US judicial rejection of actual malice and provide a route of inquiry for courts examining evidence to determine if a defamation plaintiff has met the heightened standard. This brief essay considers these cultures of fact-checking with a focus on the cultures of celebrity gossip using the recent ruling in Almanzar v. Kebe, the Cardi B vs Tasha K defamation case, as a point of departure
A Textual Analysis of the Influence of \u3cem\u3eMcIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission\u3c/em\u3e in Cases Involving Anonymous Online Commenters
Legal issues in BYOP: Bring Your Own Persona
Increasingly businesses are requiring or encouraging employees to maintain a presence on social media either through personal media use or control of a corporate account. This paper defines this kind of social media use as Bring Your Own Persona, as corporations are using the social media popularity of their employees for potential economic gain. But issues surrounding employee use and control of social media are emerging, causing businesses to go to court to assert social media account ownership, or to defend against claims of unauthorized access. This paper examines the court cases that have arisen connected to BYOP
All the Rumors are True: Verification, Actual Malice, and Celebrity Gossip
More than half of Americans get their news from social media. These spaces – social media platforms, video and audio recommender systems, social news and gossip boards – have their own fact-checking and editorial cultures that, although not the exact same as those found in newsrooms, offer similar controls for the distribution of information. While imperfect, just like the controls of traditional media, these fact-checking cultures may offer a response to recent US judicial rejection of actual malice and provide a route of inquiry for courts examining evidence to determine if a defamation plaintiff has met the heightened standard. This brief essay considers these cultures of fact-checking with a focus on the cultures of celebrity gossip using the recent ruling in Almanzar v. Kebe, the Cardi B vs Tasha K defamation case, as a point of departure