Rumination Mediates the Relationship between Infant Temperament and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms

This study examined prospective associations between negative emotionality, rumination, and depressive symptoms in a community sample of 301 youths (158 females) followed longitudinally from birth to adolescence. Mothers reported on youths' negative emotionality (NE) at age 1, and youths self-reported rumination at age 13 and depressive symptoms at ages 13 and 15. Linear regression analyses indicated that greater NE in infancy was associated with more depressive symptoms at age 15, even after controlling for child gender and depressive symptoms at age 13. Moreover, analyses indicated that rumination significantly mediated the association between infancy NE and age 15 depressive symptoms in the full sample. When analyzed separately by gender, however, rumination mediated the relationship between NE and depressive symptoms for girls but not for boys. The results confirm and extend previous findings on the association between affective and cognitive vulnerability factors in predicting depressive symptoms and the gender difference in depression in adolescence, and suggest that clinical interventions designed to reduce negative emotionality may be useful supplements to traditional cognitive interventions for reducing cognitive vulnerability to depression

Understanding Human Sexuality

vii.613 hal;25 c

Understanding Human Sexuality

vii.623 hal.; 24 c

Understanding human sexuality/ Hyde

xxiii, 740 hal. : ill. ; 26 c

Understanding human sexuality/ Hyde

xxiii, 740 hal. : ill. ; 26 c

Understanding human sexuality/ Hyde

xxiii, 740 hal. : ill. ; 26 c

Understanding human sexuality/ Hyde

xxiii, 740 hal. : ill. ; 26 c

Understanding human sexuality/ Hyde

xxiii, 740 hal. : ill. ; 26 c

Gender Differences in Human Cognition

For years, both psychologists and the general public have been fascinated with the notion that there are gender differences in cognitive abilities; even now, flashy cover stories exploiting this idea dominate major news magazines, while research focuses on differences in verbal, mathematical, spatial, and scientific abilities across gender. This new volume in the Counterpoints series not only summarizes and addresses the validity (or invalidity) of such research, but also questions its ideology and consequences. Why do we search so intently for these differences? And what are the social and cultural implications of this relentless emphasis? Do biological mechanisms, in fact, contribute to the male-female differences in cognition? These are just a few of the questions generated by this controversial topic as it is debated throughout the book.https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ias_books/1048/thumbnail.jp