11 research outputs found

    pop_caract_2002_to_2005

    No full text
    Feral populations characteristics as Number of plants, Density and Threatments

    DPCoA of cultivar composition of plants from field and feral populations from 2002 to 2005.

    No full text
    <p>DPCoA: Double Principal Coordinate Analysis. Groupings between field and feral populations (in colour) were based on the Rao dissimilarity index calculated from their cultivar compositions (in grey): the green group is F2002, pop2002 and pop2003; the blue group is F2003 and pop2004; and the red group is F2004, F2005 and pop2005. The further the cultivar is from the centre, the more it contributes to the group’s constitution. <i>Rao Divcs</i> indicates Rao diversity indexes for each field and population: the larger the square is, the bigger the diversity is. Group pop2002-F2002-pop2003 was characterised by cultivars only sown in fields in 2002 (only2002). Group F2003-pop2004 was characterised by 2003 field cultivars, and the abundance of cultivars Pollen (PLN) and Cadillac/Canary (CDL.CNY). Lastly, group F2004-pop2005-F2005 was characterised by the abundance of Aviso (AVO) and Banjo (BJO) cultivars.</p

    Internal diversity of feral populations in 2005 depending on their localisation.

    No full text
    <p>Grey dots indicate diversity indices for each population. Black bars indicate medians. Black dots indicate means.</p

    Cultivars assigned to plants from fields from 2003 to 2005 (only assigned fields are represented).

    No full text
    <p>For the fields for which a cultivar was assigned, we represent the genetic information at the plant scale. The plants assigned to a cultivar that matches the cultivar of the whole field to which the plant belongs are grouped into a category named PCAF (for Plant whom Cultivar is Assigned to the Field). For the plants for which the cultivar differed from the cultivar assigned to the whole field to which the plants belonged (not PCAF), we used the same cultivar groups as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0158403#pone.0158403.g002" target="_blank">Fig 2</a>, plus two supplementary groups established for cultivars associations persisting multiple years: - 2003:2005 (i.e. from 2003 to 2005): Aligator (ALR), Bristol (BRL), Columbus (CLS), Expert (EXP), Synergy (SNY) and Savannah (SVN); - 2004–2005: Cap-vert (CPV), Eurol (ERL), VAR004 (V004), VAR005 (V005), VAR001 (V001), Star (STR), Maxol (MXL) and VAR006 (V006). For each year, the first vertical barplot corresponds to the cultivar assignment of all the field plants, according to these groupings. The y-axis scale is expressed in proportion of plants (i.e. 0.2 means 20%). Aside, the horizontal succession of barplots is a zoom of the “not PCAF” plants of this vertical barplot. The x-axis scales are expressed in proportion, from 0 to 0.05 (i.e. 0% to 5%).”</p

    Map of the Selommes area, France, with the positions of fields and populations studied between 2002 and 2005.

    No full text
    <p><i>NG</i>: populations not genotyped. <i>Genotyped pops</i>: populations collected and genotyped. In 2002 and 2005, only spring populations (i.e. <i>Spring pops</i>) were mapped and collected. In 2004, summer populations (<i>Summer pops</i>) mainly overlapped with spring populations.</p

    Salicornia europaea L.

    No full text
    原著和名: アッケシサウ科名: アカザ科 = Chenopodiaceae採集地: 北海道 網走市 能取湖畔 (卯原内) (北海道 北見 能取湖畔 (卯原内))採集日: 1982/10/1採集者: 相見則郎整理番号: JH032805国立科学博物館整理番号: TNS-VS-98280

    Alleles obtained using primers to amplify loci in samples obtained from 2003 to 2005.

    No full text
    <p>Alleles obtained using primers to amplify loci in samples obtained from 2003 to 2005.</p

    Sampling from 2003 to 2005 (fields) and 2002 to 2005 (feral populations).

    No full text
    <p>Sampling from 2003 to 2005 (fields) and 2002 to 2005 (feral populations).</p

    Summary of the linear model describing relationships between the natural logarithm of seeds lost +1 and landscape elements.

    No full text
    .<p>≤10%;</p>*<p>≤5%;</p>**<p>≤1%;</p>***<p>≤0.1%.</p><p>On a two-lane road, when <i>Dist_field</i> is 0 m, the expected response equals (4.259−0.617)+9.93×10<sup>−3</sup>⋅<i>Surface_OSR</i>−0.470×ln(<i>Dist_road</i>)+(−4.45×10<sup>−4</sup>+2.95×10<sup>−4</sup>)⋅<i>Dist_Silo</i> = 3.642+9.93×10<sup>−3</sup>⋅<i>Surface_OSR</i>−0.470×ln(<i>Dist_road</i>)−1.491×10<sup>−4</sup> ⋅<i>Dist_Silo</i>.</p
    corecore