The Bulletin, Off-Campus Courses and Extension Services 1964-1966, Volume 64, Number 4, June (1964)

https://red.mnstate.edu/bulletins/1043/thumbnail.jp

Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward the practice of <i>gavage</i>.

*<p>For some questions the columns do not equal 100% due to missing data.</p

Knowledge and attitude toward FGM.

*<p>For some questions the columns do not equal 100% due to missing data.</p

Multivariate analysis of factors related to practice and attitude toward FGM.

**<p>p<.001;</p>*<p>p<.05.</p>§<p>This analysis was done among those women who know (heard of) the practice of FGM; we excluded women who did not know of FGM, did not belong to one of the 4 major ethnic groups, and the missing variables.</p>¥<p>This analysis was done among those women who either approve or disapprove the continuation of FGM; we excluded women who did not know of FGM, did not belong to one of the 4 major ethnic groups, and the missing variables.</p

Overall facility ranking by weighted quality scores.

<p>Overall facility ranking by weighted quality scores.</p

Service quality ranking by cases in 2011 and 2012 and by facility in 2012.

<p>Service quality ranking by cases in 2011 and 2012 and by facility in 2012.</p

Table showing model input and output variables and their definitions.

<p>Table showing model input and output variables and their definitions.</p

Scree plot showing distribution of factors by their eigenvalues.

<p>A Scree plot of eigenvalues of the unrotated factors displaying an ‘elbow’ of the plot (shown by the red arrow). This point of the curve represents the threshold chosen for retention of the initial factors extracted from the observed variables and which maximize the variance accounted for. Three factors, each respectively with eigenvalues of 5.78; 4.29; 2.99 were retained. These factors cumulatively accounted for 29.1% of the total variance (12.9%; 9.5%; 6.7%) with final communality estimates being 13.06. The shallow “scree” distal to the arrow demonstrates small extent of variance accounted for by the subsequent minor factors, which were deleted.</p

Facility actual production inputs and outputs by year based on output oriented VRS DEA model.

<p>Facility actual production inputs and outputs by year based on output oriented VRS DEA model.</p

Sample of focus group discussions and in-depth interviews by type of participant and research site.

<p>Sample of focus group discussions and in-depth interviews by type of participant and research site.</p