26 research outputs found

    Lewis et al 2016 Bury Down Rpt 6.pdf

    No full text
    <em>A Geophysical Survey of Bury Down Enclosure, Lanreath, Cornwall</em><br>Lewis, J., Frieman, C.J., Nicholas, P. & Dodd, L<br>Southeast Kernow Archaeological Survey Report No.

    Lewis Frieman 2015 Bake Rings Rpt 3.pdf

    No full text
    <em>A Geophysical Survey of Bake Rings Enclosure, Pelynt, Cornwall</em><br>Lewis, J. & Frieman, C.J<br>Southeast Kernow Archaeological Survey Report No.

    Nicholas et al 2017 Duloe Stone Circle Rpt 7.pdf

    No full text
    <em>A Geophysical Survey of Duloe Stone Circle, Duloe, Cornwall</em><br>Nicholas, P, Dodd, L, Lewis, J & Frieman, CJ<br>Southeast Kernow Archaeological Survey Report No.

    Lewis Frieman 2015 Padderbury Top Rpt 4.pdf

    No full text
    <em>A Geophysical Survey of Padderbury Top Hillfort Enclosure, St. Germans, Cornwall</em><br>Lewis, J. & Frieman, C.J<br>Cornwall. Southeast Kernow Archaeological Survey Report No.

    Lewis Frieman 2016 Hall Rings Rpt 5.pdf

    No full text
    <em>A geophysical survey of Hall Rings enclosure, Pelynt, Cornwall</em><br>Lewis, J. & Frieman, C.J<br>Southeast Kernow Archaeological Survey Report No.

    PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches

    Get PDF
    This systematic review consists of two parts. Part I seeks to synthesise evidence from primary or secondary research studies examining the implementation and effectiveness of case management tools and approaches currently being used to counter radicalisation to violence. Part II is an ‘overview of reviews’ that seeks to identify relevant and transferable lessons from systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of case management tools and approaches used in the broader field of violence prevention that could be applied to counter‐radicalisation practice.</p

    Additional file 1: Figure S1a. of Designing and implementing a socioeconomic intervention to enhance TB control: operational evidence from the CRESIPT project in Peru

    No full text
    Details of the operational conditions to meet in order to receive double incentives. b: Details of the operational conditions to meet in order to receive simple incentives. (ZIP 492 kb

    Overlaid histograms showing the distributions of the numbers of sex acts (total, unprotected and protected) with a specified partner within the last two weeks for (A) men and (B) women.

    No full text
    <p>Note that the line for total sex acts is lower than that for either unprotected or protected sex acts at zero because individuals reporting either zero unprotected or protected sex acts did not often report zero sex acts in total (due to the observed bimodal pattern of condom use described later).</p

    Observed and fitted distributions of the number of sex acts in the last two weeks.

    No full text
    <p>Panels A, C and E represent the numbers of sex acts (total, unprotected and protected) reported by men and B, D and F represent the same for women. A normal approximation of ln(sex acts+1) is used for A–D, and a negative binomial approximation of the untransformed data is used for E and F.</p
    corecore