Medicare Reimbursement for Total Joint Arthroplasty: The Driving Forces.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty is a large and growing part of the U.S. Medicare budget, drawing attention to how much providers are paid for their services. The purpose of this study was to examine the variables that affect total joint arthroplasty reimbursement. Along with standard economic variables, we include unique health-care variables. Given the focus on value in the Affordable Care Act, the model examines the relationship of the quality of care to total joint arthroplasty reimbursement. We hoped to find that reimbursement patterns reward quality and reflect standard economic principles. METHODS: Multivariable regression was performed to identify variables that correlate with Medicare reimbursement for total joint arthroplasty. Inpatient charge or reimbursement data on Medicare reimbursements were available for 2,750 hospitals with at least 10 discharges for uncomplicated total joint arthroplasty from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for fiscal year 2011. Reimbursement variability was examined by using the Dartmouth Atlas to group institutions into hospital referral regions and hospital service areas. Independent variables were taken from the Dartmouth Atlas, CMS, the WWAMI (Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, Idaho) Rural Health Research Center, and the United States Census. RESULTS: There were 427,207 total joint arthroplasties identified, with a weighted mean reimbursement of $14,324.84 (range,$9,103 to $38,686). Nationally, the coefficient of variation for reimbursements was 0.19. The regression model accounted for 52.5% of reimbursement variation among providers. The total joint arthroplasty provider volume (p \u3c 0.001) and patient satisfaction (p \u3c 0.001) were negatively correlated with reimbursement. Government ownership of a hospital (p \u3c 0.001) and higher Medicare costs (p \u3c 0.001) correlated positively with reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare reimbursements for total joint arthroplasty are highly variable. Greater reimbursement was associated with lower patient volume, lower patient satisfaction, a healthier patient population, and government ownership of a hospital. As value-based reimbursement provisions of the Affordable Care Act are implemented, there will be dramatic changes in total joint arthroplasty reimbursements. To meet these changes, providers should expect qualities such as high patient volume, willingness to care for sicker patient populations, patient satisfaction, safe outcomes, and procedural demand to correlate with their reimbursement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Practicing orthopaedic surgeons and hospital administrators should be aware of discrepancies in inpatient reimbursement for total joint arthroplasty from Medicare. Furthermore, these discrepancies are not associated with typical economic factors. These findings warrant further investigation and collaboration between policymakers and providers to develop value-based reimbursement

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Infection should be Ruled Out in All Cases

We hypothesized that some aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty failures are indeed caused by occult infection. This prospective study recruited 65 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty. The mean follow-up period was 19 months. Collected synovial fluid was analyzed by Ibis T5000 biosensor (Abbott Molecular Inc, Ill; a multiplex polymerase chain reaction technology). Cases were considered as infected or aseptic based on the surgeon\u27s judgment and Ibis findings. Based on Ibis biosensor, 17 aseptic cases were indeed infected that had been missed. Of these 17 cases, 2 developed infection after the index revision. A considerable number of so-called aseptic failures seem to be occult infections that were not adequately investigated and/or miscategorized as aseptic failure. We recommend that all patients undergoing revision arthroplasty be investigated for periprosthetic joint infection. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Analyses of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Interviews

Interviews are a critical component of orthopaedic surgery residency selection for both the applicant and the program. Some institutions no longer report Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) designation or class rank, and US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 recently switched to pass/fail scoring. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education programs conducted virtual interviews and subinternship rotations were restricted. These changes offer significant challenges to the residency match process. The purpose of this study was to examine the residency applicant interview and ranking process at a large urban academic university setting. We hypothesized that large variability exists among evaluations submitted by faculty interviewers and also that applicant academic factors (i.e., USMLE Step 1 score) would show association with final ranking. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 residency interview cycles, both conducted virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Residency application (i.e., applicant demographic and academic backgrounds) and interview data (i.e., faculty interviewer scores) were recorded. Interobserver reliability among faculty interviewers was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to determine factors associated with ranking of applicants. Results: There were 195 included applicants from the 2020 and 2021 interview cycles. There was no true agreement of interviewers\u27 scoring of shared applicants (kappa intraclass coefficient range 0-0.2). Applicant factors associated with being ranked include applying to the match for the first time, USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores, educational break (vs. consecutive completion of college and medical school in 4 years each), higher class rank, and greater interviewer scores. Factors associated with better rank included additional degrees (i.e., PhD or MBA), couples match, AOA designation, educational break, underrepresented minority status, and notable attributes (i.e., collegiate athletics or Eagle Scout participation). Factors associated with worse rank included male sex, international medical graduate, prior match history, science major, extended research (i.e., \u3e1 year spent in a research role), and home medical school students. Conclusions: There was significant variability and no reliability at our institution among faculty interviewers\u27 applicant ratings. Being ranked was based more on academic record and interview performance while final rank number seemed based on applicant qualities. The removal of merit-based objective applicant measurements offers challenges to optimal residency applicant and program match. Level of evidence: III (retrospective cohort study)

Risk factors for surgical site infection following total joint arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Currently, most hospitals in the United States are obliged to report infections that occur following total joint arthroplasty to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance. The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors of surgical site infections that were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from a single institution. METHODS: For this study, 6111 primary and revision total joint arthroplasties performed from April 2010 to June 2012 were identified. Surgical site infection cases captured by infection surveillance staff on the basis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition were identified. Surgical site infection cases with index surgery performed at another institution were excluded. All cases were followed up for one year for development of surgical site infection. The model for predictors of surgical site infection was created by logistic regression and was validated by bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: Of all performed total joint arthroplasties, surgical site infection developed in eighty cases (1.31% [95% confidence interval, 1.02% to 1.59%]). The highest rate of surgical site infection was observed in revision total knee arthroplasty (4.57% [95% confidence interval, 2.31% to 6.83%]) followed by revision total hip arthroplasty (1.94% [95% confidence interval, 0.75% to 3.13%]). Among the variables examined, the predictive factors of surgical site infection were higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio for a Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥2, 2.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 3.94] and odds ratio for a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1, 2.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 4.10]), male sex (odds ratio, 1.79 [95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 2.89]), and revision total knee arthroplasty (odds ratio, 3.13 [95% confidence interval, 1.17 to 8.34]), and a higher level of preoperative hemoglobin (odds ratio, 0.85 per point [95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.98 per point]) was protective against surgical site infection. The C-statistic of the model was 0.709 without correction and 0.678 after bootstrap correction, indicating that the model has fair predictive power. CONCLUSIONS: Low preoperative hemoglobin level is one of the risk factors for surgical site infection and preoperative correction of hemoglobin may reduce the likelihood of postoperative surgical site infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Does Prior Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Affect Outcomes of Subsequent Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament injury may accelerate knee osteoarthritis, and patients with a history of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) tend to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a greater rate than patients without a history of ACLR. Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of TKA in patients with and without a history of ACLR through a systematic review. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central, and SPORTDiscus databases from inception through November 2018 was performed to identify studies directly comparing outcomes of TKA between patients with and without a history of ipsilateral ACLR. Eligible studies were included in this review if they reported at least 1 outcome measure. Results: Included for review were 5 retrospective case-control studies collectively evaluating TKA outcomes in 318 patients (176 males, 142 females) with a history of ACLR and 455 matched controls. The mean age in the ACLR and control groups was 58.5 years and 60.9 years, respectively. The mean follow-up period after arthroplasty was 3.4 years in the ACLR group and 3.3 years in the control group. The mean time between ACLR and arthroplasty was 21.8 years. Three studies noted greater operative time in the ACLR group than in the control group. No differences in intraoperative blood loss were reported. Greater preoperative extension deficits were noted in the ACLR group in 2 studies. Two studies reported increased preoperative Knee Society Score function scores in the ACLR group, but no differences in postoperative subjective outcome scores were noted in any of the studies. One study reported increased incidence of periprosthetic joint infection and a higher total reoperation rate in the ACLR group, and another study reported an increased incidence of manipulation under anesthesia in the ACLR group. Conclusion: Short- and midterm subjective scores and functional outcomes of TKA appear to be comparable in patients with and without a history of ACLR, although the risk for reoperation after TKA may be greater in patients with prior ACLR. Surgeons should anticipate increased operative time in patients with a history of ACLR. However, the findings of this review must be interpreted within the context of its limitations

Risk Factors and Effect of Acute Kidney Injury on Outcomes Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: Development of acute kidney injury (AKI) following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a potentially avoidable complication associated with negative outcomes including increased length of stay and mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of AKI on short-term outcomes and identify risk factors for developing AKI following either total hip or total knee arthroplasty. It was hypothesized that AKI has significant adverse effects on short-term outcomes metrics. Methods: Patients undergoing primary TJA at a single hospital from 2005 to 2017 were identified and patient demographics, comorbidities, short-term outcomes, and perioperative laboratory results were recorded. AKI was defined as an increase in creatinine levels by 50% or 0.3 points. Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between patients who developed AKI and those who did not. Multivariate regressions identified the independent effect of AKI on outcomes. Results: In total, 814 (3.9%) of 20,800 patients developed AKI. AKI independently increased length of stay by 0.26 days (P \u3c .001), in-hospital complication risk (odds ratio = 1.73,P \u3c .001), and discharge to facility risk (odds ratio = 1.26, P = .012). Potentially modifiable variables including body mass index, perioperative hemoglobin levels, surgery duration, and operative fluids administered were predicative of AKI. Discussion: AKI following TJA has significant adverse effects on outcomes including length of stay, discharge, and complications. Although many identified risk factors are nonmodifiable, maintaining adequate renal perfusion through optimizing preoperative hemoglobin, sufficient fluid resuscitation, and reducing blood loss may aid in mitigating the risk of developing AKI

Analyses of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Interviews

Background:. Interviews are a critical component of orthopaedic surgery residency selection for both the applicant and the program. Some institutions no longer report Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) designation or class rank, and US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 recently switched to pass/fail scoring. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education programs conducted virtual interviews and subinternship rotations were restricted. These changes offer significant challenges to the residency match process. The purpose of this study was to examine the residency applicant interview and ranking process at a large urban academic university setting. We hypothesized that large variability exists among evaluations submitted by faculty interviewers and also that applicant academic factors (i.e., USMLE Step 1 score) would show association with final ranking. Methods:. We retrospectively reviewed the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 residency interview cycles, both conducted virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Residency application (i.e., applicant demographic and academic backgrounds) and interview data (i.e., faculty interviewer scores) were recorded. Interobserver reliability among faculty interviewers was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to determine factors associated with ranking of applicants. Results:. There were 195 included applicants from the 2020 and 2021 interview cycles. There was no true agreement of interviewers' scoring of shared applicants (kappa intraclass coefficient range 0-0.2). Applicant factors associated with being ranked include applying to the match for the first time, USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores, educational break (vs. consecutive completion of college and medical school in 4 years each), higher class rank, and greater interviewer scores. Factors associated with better rank included additional degrees (i.e., PhD or MBA), couples match, AOA designation, educational break, underrepresented minority status, and notable attributes (i.e., collegiate athletics or Eagle Scout participation). Factors associated with worse rank included male sex, international medical graduate, prior match history, science major, extended research (i.e., >1 year spent in a research role), and home medical school students. Conclusions:. There was significant variability and no reliability at our institution among faculty interviewers' applicant ratings. Being ranked was based more on academic record and interview performance while final rank number seemed based on applicant qualities. The removal of merit-based objective applicant measurements offers challenges to optimal residency applicant and program match. Level of Evidence:. III (retrospective cohort study