6 research outputs found
Asthma in an Urban Population in Portugal: A prevalence study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The prevalence and incidence of asthma are believed to be increasing but research on the true incidence, prevalence and mortality from asthma has met methodological obstacles since it has been difficult to define and diagnose asthma in epidemiological terms. New and widely accepted diagnostic criteria for asthma present opportunities for progress in this field. Studies conducted in Portugal have estimated the disease prevalence between 3% and 15%. Available epidemiological data present a significant variability due to methodological obstacles.</p> <p>Aim</p> <p>To estimate the true prevalence of asthma by gender and age groups in the population of the area covered by one urban Health Centre in Portugal.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>An observational study was conducted between February and July 2009 at the Horizonte Family Health Unit in Matosinhos, Portugal. A random sample of 590 patients, stratified by age and gender was obtained from the practice database of registered patients. Data was collected using a patient questionnaire based on respiratory symptoms and the physician's best knowledge of the patient's asthma status. The prevalence of asthma was calculated by age and gender.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Data were obtained from 576 patients (97.6% response rate). The mean age for patients with asthma was 27.0 years (95% CI: 20.95 to 33.16). This was lower than the mean age for non-asthmatics but the difference was not statistically significant. Asthma was diagnosed in 59 persons giving a prevalence of 10.24% (95% CI: 8.16 to 12.32). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of asthma by gender.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The prevalence of asthma found in the present study was higher than that found in some studies, though lower than that found in other studies. Further studies in other regions of Portugal are required to confirm these findings.</p
The Americans with Disabilities Act: An Empirical Look at U.S. District Court Litigation Involving Government Services and Public Accommodations Claims
Recommended from our members
The Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission: bridging a gap in universal health coverage for the poorest billion
For the poorest of our world, non-communicable diseases
and injuries (NCDIs) account for more than a third of their
burden of disease; this burden includes almost
800000 deaths annually among those aged younger than
40 years, more than HIV, tuberculosis, and maternal
deaths combined.
• Despite already living in abject poverty, between
19 million and 50 million of the poorest billion spend a
catastrophic amount of money each year in direct
out-of-pocket costs on health care as a result of NCDIs.
• Progressive implementation of affordable, cost-effective,
and equitable NCDI interventions between 2020 and 2030
could save the lives of more than 4·6 million of the world’s
poorest, including 1·3 million who would otherwise die
before the age of 40 years.
• To avoid needless death and suffering, and to reduce the
risk of catastrophic health spending, essential NCDI
services must be financed through pooled, public
resources, either from increased domestic funding or
external funds.
• National governments should set and adjust priorities
based on the best available local data on NCDIs and the
specific needs of the worst off.
• International development assistance for health should
be augmented and targeted to ensure that the poorest
families affected by NCDIs are included in progress
towards universal health care