48 research outputs found

    Perception, Memory, and Action in Frontal and Parietal Cortex

    No full text

    Humans optimize decision-making by delaying decision onset.

    Get PDF
    Why do humans make errors on seemingly trivial perceptual decisions? It has been shown that such errors occur in part because the decision process (evidence accumulation) is initiated before selective attention has isolated the relevant sensory information from salient distractors. Nevertheless, it is typically assumed that subjects increase accuracy by prolonging the decision process rather than delaying decision onset. To date it has not been tested whether humans can strategically delay decision onset to increase response accuracy. To address this question we measured the time course of selective attention in a motion interference task using a novel variant of the response signal paradigm. Based on these measurements we estimated time-dependent drift rate and showed that subjects should in principle be able trade speed for accuracy very effectively by delaying decision onset. Using the time-dependent estimate of drift rate we show that subjects indeed delay decision onset in addition to raising response threshold when asked to stress accuracy over speed in a free reaction version of the same motion-interference task. These findings show that decision onset is a critical aspect of the decision process that can be adjusted to effectively improve decision accuracy

    A Neural Representation of Categorization Uncertainty in the Human Brain

    Get PDF
    SummaryThe ability to classify visual objects into discrete categories (“friend” versus “foe”; “edible” versus “poisonous”) is essential for survival and is a fundamental cognitive function. The cortical substrates that mediate this function, however, have not been identified in humans. To identify brain regions involved in stimulus categorization, we developed a task in which subjects classified stimuli according to a variable categorical boundary. Psychophysical functions were used to define a decision variable, categorization uncertainty, which was systematically manipulated. Using event-related functional MRI, we discovered that activity in a fronto-striatal-thalamic network, consisting of the medial frontal gyrus, anterior insula, ventral striatum, and dorsomedial thalamus, was modulated by categorization uncertainty. We found this network to be distinct from the frontoparietal attention network, consisting of the frontal and parietal eye fields, where activity was not correlated with categorization uncertainty

    Repeated exposure to media violence is associated with diminished response in an inhibitory frontolimbic network.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Media depictions of violence, although often claimed to induce viewer aggression, have not been shown to affect the cortical networks that regulate behavior. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we found that repeated exposure to violent media, but not to other equally arousing media, led to both diminished response in right lateral orbitofrontal cortex (right ltOFC) and a decrease in right ltOFC-amygdala interaction. Reduced function in this network has been previously associated with decreased control over a variety of behaviors, including reactive aggression. Indeed, we found reduced right ltOFC responses to be characteristic of those subjects that reported greater tendencies toward reactive aggression. Furthermore, the violence-induced reduction in right ltOFC response coincided with increased throughput to behavior planning regions. CONCLUSIONS: These novel findings establish that even short-term exposure to violent media can result in diminished responsiveness of a network associated with behaviors such as reactive aggression

    Effects of heartbeat and respiration on macaque fMRI: implications for functional connectivity

    No full text
    a b s t r a c t The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in non-human primates is on the increase. It is known that the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal varies not only as a function of local neuronal energy consumption but also as a function of cardiac and respiratory activity. We mapped these cyclic cardiac and respiratory artifacts in anesthetized macaque monkeys and present an objective analysis of their impact on estimates of functional connectivity (fcMRI). Voxels with significant cardiac and respiratory artifacts were found in much the same regions as previously reported for awake humans. We show two example seeds where removing the artifacts clearly decreased the number of false positive and false negative correlations. In particular, removing the artifacts reduced correlations in the so-called resting state network. Temporal bandpass filtering or spatial smoothing may help to reduce the effects of artifacts in some cases but are not an adequate replacement for an algorithm that explicitly models and removes cyclic cardiac and respiratory artifacts

    Fit of the threshold, selection-speed and non-decision time (TAN_222) model to the data from the RT paradigm in (A–D).

    No full text
    <p>(E–H) Fit of the threshold, non-decision time and starting-point variability model (TNS_222).</p

    Trial history effects: accuracy.

    No full text
    <p>Top row: Effect of previous trial error on current trial accuracy. Positive values indicate higher accuracy after an error trial and vice verse. Bottom row: Effect of previous trial response conflict on current trial accuracy. Positive values indicate higher accuracy after an incongruent compared to a congruent trial.</p

    Timing accuracy in the cyclic deadline task.

    No full text
    <p>Timing accuracy in the cyclic deadline task measured as standard deviation of single trial processing time from the mean processing time in each block and condition.</p

    Trial history effects: processing time.

    No full text
    <p>Top row: Effect of previous trial error on current trial processing time in ms. Positive values indicate slower responses after an error trial, and vice verse. Bottom row: Effect of previous trial response conflict on current trial processing time. Positive values indicate slower responses after an incongruent compared to a congruent trial.</p
    corecore