38 research outputs found

    The phosphorous necrosis of the jaws and what can we learn from the past: a comparison of "phossy" and "bisphossy" jaw

    Full text link
    INTRODUCTION: The osteopathology of the jaws associated with bone resorption inhibitors is a current topic that engages a variety of clinical specialists. This has increased after the approval of denosumab for treatment of osteoporosis and skeletal-related events in patients with solid malignancy. Early after the first publications, there is a possible connection between phosphorous necrosis of the jaws, a dreadful industrial disease mentioned, and bisphosphonate-induced pathology. The nineteenth century was the prime time for phosphorus necrosis of match factory workers. RESULTS: This occurrence provides an interesting insight into the medical and surgical profession in the nineteenth century. There are striking parallels and repetition of current and old ideas in the approach to this "new disease." There are similar examples in case descriptions when compared with today's patients of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ). DISCUSSION: Phosphorus necrosis was first described in Austria. Soon after this, surgeons in German-speaking countries including well-known clinicians Wegner (1872) and von Schulthess-Rechberg (1879) pioneered the analysis, preventative measures, and treatment of this disease. The tendency at this time was to approach BRONJ as a "special kind of osteomyelitis" in pretreated and metabolically different bone. Not only the treatment strategy to wait until sequestrum formation with subsequent removal and preventative measures but also the idea of focusing on the periosteum as the triggering anatomical structure may have been adopted from specialists in the nineteenth century. Therefore, phosphorous necrosis of the jaw is an excellent example of "learning from the past.

    Is bisphosphonate therapy for benign bone disease associated with impaired dental healing? A case-controlled study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Bisphosphonates are common first line medications used for the management of benign bone disease. One of the most devastating complications associated with bisphosphonate use is osteonecrosis of the jaws which may be related to duration of exposure and hence cumulative dose, dental interventions, medical co-morbidities or in some circumstances with no identifiable aggravating factor. While jaw osteonecrosis is a devastating outcome which is currently difficult to manage, various forms of delayed dental healing may be a less dramatic and, therefore, poorly-recognised complications of bisphosphonate use for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is hypothesised that long-term (more than 1 year's duration) bisphosphonate use for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis or other benign bone disease is associated with impaired dental healing.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>A case-control study has been chosen to test the hypothesis as the outcome event rate is likely to be very low. A total of 54 cases will be recruited into the study following review of all dental files from oral and maxillofacial surgeons and special needs dentists in Victoria where potential cases of delayed dental healing will be identified. Potential cases will be presented to an independent case adjudication panel to determine if they are definitive delayed dental healing cases. Two hundred and fifteen controls (1:4 cases:controls), matched for age and visit window period, will be selected from those who have attended local community based referring dental practices. The primary outcome will be the incidence of delayed dental healing that occurs either spontaneously or following dental treatment such as extractions, implant placement, or denture use.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This study is the largest case-controlled study assessing the link between bisphosphonate use and delayed dental healing in Australia. It will provide invaluable data on the potential link between bisphosphonate use and osteonecrosis of the jaws.</p

    General medicine and surgery for dental practitioners. Part 6 - Cancer, radiotherapy and chemotherapy

    No full text
    Dental practitioners will encounter patients who have been affected by cancer or who are current cancer patients. Dentists play an important role in the overall healthcare of such patients, particularly in those with head and neck malignancy. This paper gives an overview of the impact of cancer and its treatment on dental management. © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.Link_to_subscribed_fulltex

    Denosumab, an alternative to bisphosphonates but also associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw – what is the risk?

    No full text
    Most dental professionals will have, or will soon, encounter patients prescribed this novel alternative antiresorptive drug to bisphosphonates, denosumab (Prolia®, Xgeva®). Denosumab is licensed in the UK for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women and the prevention of skeletal-related events (SRE) in adults with bone metastases. The presence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving non-bisphosphonate antiresorptives has led to the introduction of the term antiresorptive-related osteonecrosis of the jaw or ARONJ. This paper discusses the basic physiology of bone remodelling, the pharmacology of bisphosphonates and denosumab, and the risk of ARONJ
    corecore