Size Doesn't Matter: Towards a More Inclusive Philosophy of Biology

notes: As the primary author, O’Malley drafted the paper, and gathered and analysed data (scientific papers and talks). Conceptual analysis was conducted by both authors.publication-status: Publishedtypes: ArticlePhilosophers of biology, along with everyone else, generally perceive life to fall into two broad categories, the microbes and macrobes, and then pay most of their attention to the latter. ‘Macrobe’ is the word we propose for larger life forms, and we use it as part of an argument for microbial equality. We suggest that taking more notice of microbes – the dominant life form on the planet, both now and throughout evolutionary history – will transform some of the philosophy of biology’s standard ideas on ontology, evolution, taxonomy and biodiversity. We set out a number of recent developments in microbiology – including biofilm formation, chemotaxis, quorum sensing and gene transfer – that highlight microbial capacities for cooperation and communication and break down conventional thinking that microbes are solely or primarily single-celled organisms. These insights also bring new perspectives to the levels of selection debate, as well as to discussions of the evolution and nature of multicellularity, and to neo-Darwinian understandings of evolutionary mechanisms. We show how these revisions lead to further complications for microbial classification and the philosophies of systematics and biodiversity. Incorporating microbial insights into the philosophy of biology will challenge many of its assumptions, but also give greater scope and depth to its investigations

Subtleties in control by metabolic channelling and enzyme organization

Because of its importance to cell function, the free-energy metabolism of the living cell is subtly and homeostatically controlled. Metabolic control analysis enables a quantitative determination of what controls the relevant fluxes. However, the original metabolic control analysis was developed for idealized metabolic systems, which were assumed to lack enzyme-enzyme association and direct metabolite transfer between enzymes (channelling). We here review the recently developed molecular control analysis, which makes it possible to study non-ideal (channelled, organized) systems quantitatively in terms of what controls the fluxes, concentrations, and transit times. We show that in real, non-ideal pathways, the central control laws, such as the summation theorem for flux control, are richer than in ideal systems: the sum of the control of the enzymes participating in a non-ideal pathway may well exceed one (the number expected in the ideal pathways), but may also drop to values below one. Precise expressions indicate how total control is determined by non-ideal phenomena such as ternary complex formation (two enzymes, one metabolite), and enzyme sequestration. The bacterial phosphotransferase system (PTS), which catalyses the uptake and concomitant phosphorylation of glucose (and also regulates catabolite repression) is analyzed as an experimental example of a non-ideal pathway. Here, the phosphoryl group is channelled between enzymes, which could increase the sum of the enzyme control coefficients to two, whereas the formation of ternary complexes could decrease the sum of the enzyme control coefficients to below one. Experimental studies have recently confirmed this identification, as well as theoretically predicted values for the total control. Macromolecular crowding was shown to be a major candidate for the factor that modulates the non-ideal behaviour of the PTS pathway and the sum of the enzyme control coefficients.Articl