8 research outputs found
Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Endometrial Cancer
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in malignancy is associated with poor outcomes. We conducted a retrospective review of VTE in patients with endometrial cancer to characterize the VTE incidence, identify factors that contribute to VTE risk, and compare survival outcomes in patients with and without VTE. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 422 eligible patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer (1 January 2014 to 31 July 2016). The primary outcome was VTE. Binary logistic regression identified risk factors for VTE; significant risk factors were included in a multivariate analysis. KaplanâMeier estimates are reported, and log rank tests were used to compare the KaplanâMeier curves. Risk-adjusted estimates for overall survival based on VTE were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The incidence of VTE was 6.16% overall and 0.7% within 60 days postoperatively. Non-endometrioid histology, stages 3 and 4 disease, laparotomy, and age (p < 0.1) were identified as factors associated with VTE and were included in a multivariate analysis. The overall death rate in patients with VTE was 42% (9% without VTE): hazard ratio, 5.63; 95% confidence interval, 2.86 to 11.08; p < 0.0001. Adjusting for age, stage of disease, and histology, risk of death remained significant for patients with a VTE: hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 4.42; p = 0.0271. Conclusions: A method to identify patients with endometrial cancer who are at high risk for VTE is important, given the implications of VTE for patient outcomes and the frequency of endometrial cancer diagnoses. Factors identified in our study might assist in the recognition of such patients
Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 2: treatment
Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 1: prophylaxis
EFFECT OF TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) ON HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQoL) IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA. RESULTS OF THE EF-14 RANDOMIZED PHASE III TRIAL
Neurolog
Influence of Treatment With Tumor-Treating Fields on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) therapy improves both progression-free and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma. There is a need to assess the influence of TTFields on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
To examine the association of TTFields therapy with progression-free survival and HRQoL among patients with glioblastoma.
This secondary analysis of EF-14, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, compares TTFields and temozolomide or temozolomide alone in 695 patients with glioblastoma after completion of radiochemotherapy. Patients with glioblastoma were randomized 2:1 to combined treatment with TTFields and temozolomide or temozolomide alone. The study was conducted from July 2009 until November 2014, and patients were followed up through December 2016.
Temozolomide, 150 to 200 mg/m2/d, was given for 5 days during each 28-day cycle. TTFields were delivered continuously via 4 transducer arrays placed on the shaved scalp of patients and were connected to a portable medical device.
Primary study end point was progression-free survival; HRQoL was a predefined secondary end point, measured with questionnaires at baseline and every 3 months thereafter. Mean changes from baseline scores were evaluated, as well as scores over time. Deterioration-free survival and time to deterioration were assessed for each of 9 preselected scales and items.
Of the 695 patients in the study, 639 (91.9%) completed the baseline HRQoL questionnaire. Of these patients, 437 (68.4%) were men; mean (SD) age, 54.8 (11.5) years. Health-related quality of life did not differ significantly between treatment arms except for itchy skin. Deterioration-free survival was significantly longer with TTFields for global health (4.8 vs 3.3 months; Pâ<â.01); physical (5.1 vs 3.7 months; Pâ<â.01) and emotional functioning (5.3 vs 3.9 months; Pâ<â.01); pain (5.6 vs 3.6 months; Pâ<â.01); and leg weakness (5.6 vs 3.9 months; Pâ<â.01), likely related to improved progression-free survival. Time to deterioration, reflecting the influence of treatment, did not differ significantly except for itchy skin (TTFields worse; 8.2 vs 14.4 months; Pâ<â.001) and pain (TTFields improved; 13.4 vs 12.1 months; Pâ<â.01). Role, social, and physical functioning were not affected by TTFields.
The addition of TTFields to standard treatment with temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma results in improved survival without a negative influence on HRQoL except for more itchy skin, an expected consequence from the transducer arrays.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409