33 research outputs found

    Reliability of a high-intensity endurance cycling test.

    Get PDF
    This study assessed the reproducibility of performance and selected metabolic variables during a variable high-intensity endurance cycling test. 8 trained male cyclists (age: 35.9 ± 7.7 years, maximal oxygen uptake: 54.3 ± 3.9 mL·kg - 1·min - 1) completed 4 high-intensity cycling tests, performed in consecutive weeks. The protocol comprised: 20 min of progressive incremental exercise, where the power output was increased by 5% maximal workload (Wmax) every 5 min from 70% Wmax to 85% Wmax; ten 90 s bouts at 90% Wmax, separated by 180 s at 55% Wmax; 90% Wmax until volitional exhaustion. Blood samples were drawn and heart rate was monitored throughout the protocol. There was no significant order effect between trials for time to exhaustion (mean: 4 113.0 ± 60.8 s) or total distance covered (mean: 4 6126.2 ± 1 968.7 m). Total time to exhaustion and total distance covered showed very high reliability with a mean coefficient of variation (CV) of 1.6% (95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 0.0 ± 124.3 s) and CV of 2.2% (95% CI 0.0 ± 1904.9 m), respectively. Variability in plasma glucose concentrations across the time points was very small (CV 0.46-4.3%, mean 95% CI 0.0 ± 0.33 to 0.0 ± 0.94 mmol·L - 1). Plasma lactate concentrations showed no test order effect. The reliability of performance and metabolic variables makes this protocol a valid test to evaluate nutritional interventions in endurance cycling

    Wise Up To Cancer - can it make a difference? Executive Summary.

    Get PDF
    A summary of the evaluation of Wise Up To Cancer. A Community Health Initiative funded by Yorkshire Cancer Research, aiming to improve cancer outcomes

    Core Temperature Responses of Fire-fighter Instructors During Work in a Hot and Normal Environment

    Get PDF
    It is important to employ training practices that ensure that fire-fighter instructors work in an environment which does not provoke unacceptable rises in core temperature (>38°C). PURPOSE: To assess the effects of a two-day fire-behaviour training (FBT) course on the core temperature (Tc) of fire-fighter instructors in order to establish whether current training practices ensure a safe working environment. METHODS: Eleven males (mean±sd age 38.3±4.3 yr, body mass 88.5±12.7 kg and stature 177.8±5.3 cm) from two regional training centres completed three days of standard FBT, wearing full protective clothing and breathing apparatus. Two consecutive days (HOT1 and HOT2, mean ambient temperature of 12.7°C) each consisted of a morning and an afternoon heat exposure (approximately 30 minutes in duration). The third day was a control (NORM), without heat exposure (mean Tc of 19.3 °C). Tc was measured at baseline (BASE) and at the start and end of the two exposures (PRE-AM, POST-AM and PRE-PM, POST-PM respectively) for each subject using a telemetry pill (HQ Inc, USA). RESULTS: There was a different pattern of Tc response over the two HOT days compared with the NORM day due to the significant increase in Tc associated with each of the heat exposures (p<0.01, PRE to POST, Table 1). Mean Tc did not reach 38°C, but in 10 out of 44 individual exposures subjects had a T above 38°C post heat exposure. In contrast, baseline T for the three days was not significantly different and showed a consistent significant increase to PRE-AM values (p<0.01, BASE to PRE-AM, Table 1) associated with the wearing of protective clothing and morning activities. The mean (±sd) unit temperatures of the HOT and NORM days were 160.2 (±89.3) and 27.6 (±8.4) °C respectively. CONCLUSION: The physiological strain experienced due to heat exposure in firefighter instructors resulted in a significant increase in Tc above that experienced during similar physical exertion with no heat exposure. While mean Tc did not reach 38°C, defined as an acceptable limit for work, Tc did rise above 38°C after approximately 1 in 4 individual heat exposures

    Wise Up To Cancer - can it make a difference?

    Get PDF
    This document reports the findings of 'Wise Up To Cancer' a Community Health Initiative, funded by Yorkshire Cancer Research. The aims of Wise Up To Cancer were to; decrease behaviours associated with cancer risk, increase awareness of cancer signs and symptoms,, increase cancer screening rates and increase signposting to other services

    A whole system approach to increasing children's physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol

    Get PDF
    Background Engaging in regular physical activity requires continued complex decision-making in varied and dynamic individual, social and structural contexts. Widespread shortfalls of physical activity interventions suggests the complex underlying mechanisms of change are not yet fully understood. More insightful process evaluations are needed to design and implement more effective approaches. This paper describes the protocol for a process evaluation of the JU:MP programme, a whole systems approach to increasing physical activity in children and young people aged 5–14 years in North Bradford, UK. Methods This process evaluation, underpinned by realist philosophy, aims to understand the development and implementation of the JU:MP programme and the mechanisms by which JU:MP influences physical activity in children and young people. It also aims to explore behaviour change across wider policy, strategy and neighbourhood systems. A mixed method data collection approach will include semi-structured interview, observation, documentary analysis, surveys, and participatory evaluation methods including reflections and ripple effect mapping. Discussion This protocol offers an innovative approach on the use of process evaluation feeding into an iterative programme intended to generate evidence-based practice and deliver practice-based evidence. This paper advances knowledge regarding the development of process evaluations for evaluating systems interventions, and emphasises the importance of process evaluation

    Correction to: A whole system approach to increasing children's physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol

    Get PDF
    Background Engaging in regular physical activity requires continued complex decision-making in varied and dynamic individual, social and structural contexts. Widespread shortfalls of physical activity interventions suggests the complex underlying mechanisms of change are not yet fully understood. More insightful process evaluations are needed to design and implement more effective approaches. This paper describes the protocol for a process evaluation of the JU:MP programme, a whole systems approach to increasing physical activity in children and young people aged 5–14 years in North Bradford, UK. Methods This process evaluation, underpinned by realist philosophy, aims to understand the development and implementation of the JU:MP programme and the mechanisms by which JU:MP influences physical activity in children and young people. It also aims to explore behaviour change across wider policy, strategy and neighbourhood systems. A mixed method data collection approach will include semi-structured interview, observation, documentary analysis, surveys, and participatory evaluation methods including reflections and ripple effect mapping. Discussion This protocol offers an innovative approach on the use of process evaluation feeding into an iterative programme intended to generate evidence-based practice and deliver practice-based evidence. This paper advances knowledge regarding the development of process evaluations for evaluating systems interventions, and emphasises the importance of process evaluation

    Child and family experiences of a whole-systems approach to physical activity in a multiethnic UK city: a citizen science evaluation protocol.

    Get PDF
    YesWhole-systems approaches are being adopted to tackle physical inactivity. The mechanisms contributing to changes resulting from whole-systems approaches are not fully understood. The voices of children and families that these approaches are designed for need to be heard to understand what is working, for whom, where and in what context. This paper describes the protocol for the children and families' citizen science evaluation of the Join Us: Move, Play (JU:MP) programme, a whole-systems approach to increasing physical activity in children and young people aged 5-14 years in Bradford, UK. The evaluation aims to understand the lived experiences of children and families' relationship with physical activity and participation in the JU:MP programme. The study takes a collaborative and contributory citizen science approach, including focus groups, parent-child dyad interviews and participatory research. Feedback and data will guide changes within this study and the JU:MP programme. We also aim to examine participant experience of citizen science and the suitability of a citizen science approach to evaluate a whole-systems approach. Data will be analysed using framework approach alongside iterative analysis with and by citizen scientists in the collaborative citizen science study. Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Bradford: study one (E891-focus groups as part of the control trial, E982-parent-child dyad interviews) and study two (E992). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the participants, through schools or directly. The citizen scientists will provide input to create further dissemination opportunities

    Advancing newborn health: The Saving Newborn Lives initiative

    Get PDF
    Until recently, newborn health was virtually absent from the global health agenda. Now, assistance agencies, national governments and non-governmental organisations are increasingly addressing this previously neglected issue of close to four million newborns dying every year. The experience of the Saving Newborn Lives initiative documents some of the progress that has been made and the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. Since the start of the initiative in 2000, targeted research, focused on overcoming the key barriers to improved newborn survival, has demonstrated low-cost, community-based interventions and strategies that can significantly reduce newborn mortality. Building on what has been learned from this and other efforts to date, the challenge now is to reach the millions of newborns still at risk
    corecore