12,622 research outputs found

    Comment on "Chain Length Scaling of Protein Folding Time", PRL 77, 5433 (1996)

    Full text link
    In a recent Letter, Gutin, Abkevich, and Shakhnovich (GAS) reported on a series of dynamical Monte Carlo simulations on lattice models of proteins. Based on these highly simplified models, they found that four different potential energies lead to four different folding time scales tau_f, where tau_f scales with chain length as N^lambda (see, also, Refs. [2-4]), with lambda varying from 2.7 to 6.0. However, due to the lack of microscopic models of protein folding dynamics, the interpretation and origin of the data have remained somewhat speculative. It is the purpose of this Comment to point out that the application of a simple "mesoscopic" model (cond-mat/9512019, PRL 77, 2324, 1996) of protein folding provides a full account of the data presented in their paper. Moreover, we find a major qualitative disagreement with the argumentative interpretation of GAS. Including, the origin of the dynamics, and size of the critical folding nucleus.Comment: 1 page Revtex, 1 fig. upon request. Submitted to PR

    Determining B(E1)B(E1) distributions of weakly bound nuclei from breakup cross sections using Continuum Discretized Coupled Channels calculations. Application to 11^{11}Be

    Full text link
    A novel method to extract the B(E1)B(E1) strength of a weakly bound nucleus from experimental Coulomb dissociation data is proposed. The method makes use of continuum discretized coupled channels (CDCC) calculations, in which both nuclear and Coulomb forces are taken into account to all orders. This is a crucial advantage with respect to the standard procedure based on the Equivalent Photon Method (EPM) which does not properly take into account nuclear distortion, higher order coupling effects, or Coulomb-nuclear interference terms. The procedure is applied to the 11^{11}Be nucleus using two sets of available experimental data at different energies, for which seemingly incompatible B(E1)B(E1) have been reported using the EPM. We show that the present procedure gives consistent B(E1)B(E1) strengths, thus solving the aforementioned long-standing discrepancy between the two measurements.Comment: Submitted for publicatio
    corecore