Physical activity, physical fitness and self-rated health: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations in adolescents.

This is the final version. Available from BMJ Publishing via the DOI in this record. Data availability statement: Data are available on reasonable request. The data are available from THT on reasonable request.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the independent associations of physical activity and physical fitness with self-rated health in adolescents. METHODS: Data from a 2-year observational study (2013-2015) were used (n=256, 58% girls, 13.7±0.3 years at baseline). Self-rated health was assessed with a questionnaire, physical activity by an accelerometer and a questionnaire, and physical fitness via the measurements included in the Finnish national Move! monitoring system for physical functional capacity and their z-score average (fitness index). RESULTS: Self-reported physical activity had cross-sectional associations with self-rated health (girls β 0.213, p=0.006, β 0.221 boys p=0.021) while accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous physical activity did not. Higher self-reported physical activity at baseline was associated with higher self-rated health at follow-up in boys (β 0.289, p<0.001), but not in girls (β -0.056, p=0.430). Accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous physical activity had positive longitudinal associations with future self-rated health in boys, but some of these similar associations were negative in girls. Fitness index had a positive cross-sectional association with self-rated health in boys (β 0.282 or β 0.283, p=0.002), but not in girls (β 0.162 or β 0.161, p=0.051). Physical fitness was not longitudinally associated with self-rated health. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported physical activity showed potential to explain current and future self-rated health better than accelerometer-based physical activity or physical fitness. We recommended to consider self-reported physical activity as an adequate metric of adolescent health in the population-level surveillance systems.Finnish Ministry of Education and CultureJuho Vainio Foundatio

Determination of colostral immunoglobulins by gel filtration chromatography

vETL22ET

Eukaryotic DNA polymerases, a growing family.

In eukaryotic cells, DNA polymerases are required to maintain the integrity of the genome during processes, such as DNA replication, various DNA repair events, translesion DNA synthesis, DNA recombination, and also in regulatory events, such as cell cycle control and DNA damage checkpoint function. In the last two years, the number of known DNA polymerases has increased to at least nine (called alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon, zeta, eta, t and iota), and yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains REV1 deoxycytidyl transferase

Structural relationship between DNA polymerases epsilon and epsilon* and their occurrence in eukaryotic cells.

Monoclonal antibodies raised against the N-terminal half of human DNA polymerase epsilon bind both to a large > 200 kDa form of DNA polymerase epsilon from HeLa cells and to a small 140 kDa form (DNA polymerase epsilon*) from calf thymus, while antibody against the C-terminal half binds to DNA polymerase epsilon but does not bind to DNA polymerase epsilon*. These results indicate that the two enzymes have common structural motifs in their N-terminal halves, and that DNA polymerase epsilon* is very likely derived from DNA polymerase epsilon by removal of its C-terminal half. DNA polymerase epsilon as well as DNA polymerase epsilon* was detected in extracts from cells of numerous eukaryotic species from yeast to human. The results indicate that DNA polymerase epsilon and its tendency to occur in a smaller form, DNA polymerase epsilon*, are evolutionarily highly conserved and that DNA polymerase epsilon may occur universally in proliferating eukaryotic cells

Stability of activity of bovine colostrum derived anti-caries streptococci antibodies added to a UHT milk product

vokEK