La comunicazione interculturale e l’approccio comunicativo: dall’idea allo strumento

il saggio si inserisce in un filone di ricerca aperto nel 199 e proseguito con saggi e volumi: in questo caso di descrive e discute la progettazione di un passo fondamentale, dall'elaborazione teorica del modello di riferimento alla traduzione di tale modello in strumento operativo per la consultazione e la didattica

Remodeling of Rectal Innervation After Pullthrough Surgery for Hirschsprung Disease: Relevance to Criteria for the Determination of Retained Transition Zone

© 2018, Society for Pediatric Pathology All rights reserved. Background: After pullthrough surgery for Hirschsprung disease (HSCR), Glut1-positive submucosal nerve hypertrophy is used to diagnose retained transition zone in the neorectum. We hypothesized that pelvic nerves, severed during pullthrough surgery, sprout into the neorectum to mimic transition zone. Methods: The density (nerves/100x field) and maximum diameter of Glut1-positive submucosal nerves were measured in biopsies and redo resections from 20 patients with post-pullthrough obstructive symptoms. Their original and/or redo resections excluded unequivocal features of transition zone (myenteric hypoganglionosis or partial circumferential aganglionosis) in 17. Postoperative values were compared with control data from 28 cadaveric and 6 surgical non-HSCR specimens, and 14 primary HSCR resections. When possible, nerves were tracked from attached native pelvic soft tissue or aganglionic rectal cuff into the pulled-through colon. Results: Glut1-positive submucosal nerves were not present in the 11 colons of non-HSCR infants less than 1 year of age, except sparsely in the rectum. In 17 older non-HSCR controls, occasional Glut1-positive nerves were observed in prerectal colon and were larger and more numerous in the rectum. In redo resections, Glut1-positive submucosal innervation in post-pullthrough specimens did not differ significantly from age-appropriate non-HSCR rectal controls and pelvic Glut1-positive nerves were never observed to penetrate the pulled-through colon. However, the density and caliber of Glut1-positive nerves in the neorectums were significantly greater than expected based on the prerectal location from which the pulled-through bowel originated. Conclusions: Submucosal innervation in post-pullthrough specimens does not support the hypothesis that native pelvic nerves innervate the neorectum, but suggests remodeling occurs to establish the age-appropriate density and caliber of rectal Glut1-positive innervation. The latter should not be interpreted as transition zone pullthrough in a rectal biopsy from a previously done pullthrough

Measure twice and cut once: Comparing endoscopy and 3D cloacagram for the common channel and urethral measurements in patients with cloacal malformations

© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Introduction: Precise and accurate measurement of the common channel and urethra is a critical determinant prior to the repair of cloacal malformations. Endoscopy and 3D reconstruction cloacagram are two common modalities utilized to help plan the surgical approach, however the consistency between these methods is unknown. Methods: Common channel and urethral lengths obtained by endoscopy and 3D cloacagram of cloaca patients at six pediatric colorectal centers were compared. Data are given as mean (range). Results: 72 patients were included in the study. Common channel measurements determined by 3D cloacagram and endoscopy were equal in 7 cases (10%). Endoscopic measurements of the common channel were longer than 3D cloacagram in 20 (28%) cases and shorter in the remaining 44 (62%) cases. The absolute difference between measurements of the common channel was 7.2 mm (0–2.4 cm). Urethral measurements by both modalities were equal in 8 cases (12%). Endoscopic measurement of the urethra was longer than that by 3D cloacagram in 20 (31%) patients and shorter in 37 (57%) of cases. The absolute difference between measurements of the urethra was 5.1 mm (0–2.0 cm). The reconstruction (e.g. TUM or urogenital separation) that would be performed according to measurements determined by 3D cloacagram and endoscopic measurements differed in 13/62 (21%) patients with each structure identified and common channel measurements of \u3e 1 cm. Conclusion: Significant variation exists in the measurements of the common channel and urethra in patients with cloacal malformations as determined by endoscopy and 3D cloacagram. This variation should be considered as these measurements influence the decision to perform either a TUM or urogenital separation. Based on these findings, 3D cloacagram should be performed in all patients prior to cloaca repair to prevent mischaracterization of the malformation. Level of evidence: Level IV

Rectal Prolapse Following Repair of Anorectal Malformation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management

BACKGROUND: The incidence and optimal management of rectal prolapse following repair of an anorectal malformation (ARM) has not been well-defined. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium registry. All children with a history of ARM repair were included. Our primary outcome was rectal prolapse. Secondary outcomes included operative management of prolapse and anoplasty stricture following operative management of prolapse. Univariate analyses were performed to identify patient factors associated with our primary and secondary outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess the association between laparoscopic ARM repair and rectal prolapse. RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients met inclusion criteria; 163 (14.3%) developed rectal prolapse. On univariate analysis, prolapse was significantly associated with male sex, sacral abnormalities, ARM type, ARM complexity, and laparoscopic ARM repairs (p \u3c 0.001). ARM types with the highest rates of prolapse included rectourethral-prostatic fistula (29.2%), rectovesical/bladder neck fistula (28.8%), and cloaca (25.0%). Of those who developed prolapse, 110 (67.5%) underwent operative management. Anoplasty strictures developed in 27 (24.5%) patients after prolapse repair. After controlling for ARM type and hospital, laparoscopic ARM repair was not significantly associated with prolapse (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 1.50 (0.84, 2.66), p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Rectal prolapse develops in a significant subset of patients following ARM repair. Risk factors for prolapse include male sex, complex ARM type, and sacral abnormalities. Further research investigating the indications for operative management of prolapse and operative techniques for prolapse repair are needed to define optimal treatment. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II