Relationship between physical capacity and match performance in semiprofessional Australian rules football

This study investigated the relationship between physical performance and match performance in Australian Rules Football (ARF). Thirty-six semiprofessional ARF players participated in this study. Physical capacity was measured using a 3-km time trial. Match performance was measured throughout the 2013 season through 2 methods: direct game involvements (DGIs) per minute and a recording of coaches\u27 vote after the game. The main finding of the study was that 3-km time trial performance was a significant predictor of DGI per minute (p ≤ 0.05). In addition, the number of senior games played was also significant in predicting DGI per minute (p ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, the number of senior games significantly correlated with coaches\u27 votes (p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant relationships between 3-km time trial and coaches\u27 vote. The results highlight the importance of developing physical capacity in the preseason period; the players who were better performers in the 3-km time trial had a greater number of DGIs per minute. This information is important to consider in preseason planning to ensure sufficient time is dedicated to developing physical capacity in the training program, as it is directly associated with performance. In addition, this research also highlights the importance of playing experience in relation to team selection. Playing experience, as measured by the number of senior games played, had a significant relationship with both measures of match performance

Large Area Crop Inventory Experiment (LACIE). Second-generation sampling strategy evaluation report

The author has identified the following significant results. The stratification procedure in the new sampling strategy for LACIE included: (1) correlation test results indicating that an agrophysical stratum may be homogeneous with respect to agricultural density, but not with respect to wheat density; and (2) agrophysical unit homogeneity test results indicating that with respect to agricultural density many agrophysical units are not homogeneous, but removal of one or more refined strata from any such current agrophysical unit can make the strata homogeneous. The apportioning procedure results indicated that the current procedure is not performing well and that the apportioned estimates of refined strata wheat area are often unreliable

Remote Extraction of Latent Fingerprints (RELF)

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from IEEE via the DOI in this recordLatent fingerprints are the kind left on objects after direct contact with a person’s finger, often unwittingly at crime scenes. Most current techniques for extracting these types of fingerprint are invasive and involve contaminating the fingerprint with chemicals which often renders the fingerprint unusable for further forensic testing. We propose a novel and robust method for extracting latent fingerprints from surfaces without the addition of contaminants or chemicals to the evidence. We show our technique works on notoriously difficult to image surfaces, using off-the-shelf cameras and statistical analysis. In particular, we extract images of latent fingerprints from surfaces which are transparent, curved and specular such as glass lightbulbs and jars, which are challenging due to the curvature of the surface. Our method produces results comparable to more invasive methods and leaves the fingerprint sample unaffected for further forensic analysis. Our technique uses machine learning to identify partial fingerprints between successive images and mosaics them

2017 McDonald diagnostic criteria: A review of the evidence

The diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has continuously evolved, allowing for an earlier and more accurate diagnosis of MS over time. The McDonald Criteria for diagnosis of MS were originally proposed in 2001, with previous revisions in both 2005 and 2010. The International Panel on Diagnosis in MS have recently reviewed the 2010 McDonald Criteria, and made recommendations for the revised 2017 McDonald Criteria. Any revisions made relied entirely on the available evidence, and not expert opinion. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent 2017 revisions to the McDonald Criteria, focusing in particular on the motivating evidence behind the recommendations made. We also review the existing research around misdiagnosis in MS, as well as areas considered to be high priorities of research, currently lacking in sufficient evidence, which may influence future diagnostic criteria in years to come. Finally, we illustrate some clinical examples, to demonstrate the impact of new diagnostic criteria on time to MS diagnosis in a real-world setting