Global prevalence and burden of meal-related abdominal pain

BACKGROUND: Patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) report meal intake to be associated with symptoms. DGBI patients with meal-related symptoms may have more severe symptoms overall and worse health outcomes, but this subgroup has not been well characterized. We aimed to describe the global prevalence of meal-related abdominal pain and characterize this subgroup. METHODS: The data analyzed originated from the Internet survey component of the population-based Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study, completed in 26 countries (n = 54,127). Adult subjects were asked whether they had abdominal pain and how often this was meal-related. Respondents were categorized into no, occasional, and frequent meal-related abdominal pain groups based on 0%, 10-40%, and ≥50% of the pain episodes being meal-related, respectively. DGBI diagnoses, frequency of other GI symptoms, psychological distress, non-GI somatic symptoms, quality of life, and healthcare utilization were compared between groups. Mixed linear and ordinal regression was used to assess independent associations between psychological distress, non-GI somatic symptoms, quality of life, other GI symptoms, and meal-related abdominal pain. RESULTS: Overall, 51.9% of the respondents reported abdominal pain in the last 3 months, and 11.0% belonged to the group with frequent meal-related abdominal pain, which included more females and younger subjects. DGBI diagnoses were more common in subjects with frequent meal-related abdominal pain, and the frequency of several GI symptoms was associated with having more frequent meal-related abdominal pain. Having meal-related abdominal pain more frequently was also associated with more severe psychological distress, non-GI somatic symptoms, and a poorer quality of life. The group with frequent meal-related abdominal pain also more often consulted a doctor for bowel problems compared to the other groups of meal-related abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: Reporting frequent meal-related abdominal pain is common across the globe and associated with other GI and non-GI somatic symptoms, psychological distress, healthcare utilization, and a poorer quality of life. Individuals who frequently experience meal-related abdominal pain also more frequently fulfill the diagnostic criteria for DGBI. Assessing meal-related symptoms in all DGBI patients could be of major importance to improve and individualize symptom management

Gastrointestinal bleeding in Iceland and in broader terms – a review

To access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked DownloadBráð blæðing frá meltingarvegi er algeng ástæða komu á bráðamóttöku og innlagnar á spítala. Þessum blæðingum er vanalega skipt í efri og neðri meltingarvegarblæðingar. Í þessari yfirlitsgrein verður farið yfir nýgengi þessara blæðinga, áhættuþætti, orsakir, þátt blóðþynningarlyfja, mat á alvarleika blæðinga, meðferðarúrræði og horfur. Reynt verður að varpa ljósi á þetta viðfangsefni í íslensku heilbrigðiskerfi en einnig í víðara samhengi

Gastrointestinal bleeding in Iceland and in broader terms – a review

To access publisher's full text version of this article, please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field or click on the hyperlink at the top of the page marked DownloadBráð blæðing frá meltingarvegi er algeng ástæða komu á bráðamóttöku og innlagnar á spítala. Þessum blæðingum er vanalega skipt í efri og neðri meltingarvegarblæðingar. Í þessari yfirlitsgrein verður farið yfir nýgengi þessara blæðinga, áhættuþætti, orsakir, þátt blóðþynningarlyfja, mat á alvarleika blæðinga, meðferðarúrræði og horfur. Reynt verður að varpa ljósi á þetta viðfangsefni í íslensku heilbrigðiskerfi en einnig í víðara samhengi

Increased incidence of autoimmune hepatitis is associated with wider use of biological drugs.

To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowBACKGROUND & AIMS: Population-based studies on the epidemiology of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are scarce. Drug-induced AIH (DIAIH) is increasingly recognized in association with immunomodulatory therapy. We aimed to determine the incidence, prevalence and natural history of AIH in a population-based setting. METHODS: We collected data of new diagnosis of AIH in Iceland from 2006 to 2015. Cases were identified through search of diagnostic codes and text search for AIH within electronical medical records of all hospitals in Iceland and through records of smooth muscle antibodies (SMA) test results by the only laboratory in the country analyzing SMA. Patients were included in the final analysis if they received the clinical diagnosis of AIH or were started on immunosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: The mean annual incidence of AIH in Iceland was 2.2 cases per 100 000 inhabitants. Point prevalence on 31 December 2015 was 27/100 000. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years and 86% of patients were of female gender. DIAIH was suspected in 13 of 71 patients (18%) of which eight cases were related to infliximab. Immunosuppressive treatment was started in all but two patients. At the end of follow-up (median 4.8 years) 66 of 71 (93%) patients were alive. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence rates of AIH in Iceland are the highest reported so far in a population-based setting. Higher incidence can partly be explained by the increasing use of biological drugs. Immunosuppressive therapy was very effective in achieving remission and prognosis was favorable

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: incidence, etiology, and outcomes in a population-based setting.

To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field.To investigate the incidence and outcomes of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) in a population-based setting and examine the role of drugs potentially associated with GIB.National University Hospital of Icelan

Associations between postprandial symptoms, hydrogen and methane production, and transit time in irritable bowel syndrome

International audienceBackground: Abnormal oroanal transit time (OATT) and visceral hypersensitivity are key pathophysiological factors in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The lactulose nutrient challenge test (LNCT) has been developed to assess the postprandial symptoms and gut microbial fermentation. We aimed to investigate associations between OATT, rectal sensitivity, and LNCT in IBS patients.Methods: We included 263 IBS patients from two study cohorts, where the link between pathophysiology and symptoms was investigated. During the LNCT, severity of postprandial symptoms was graded, and breath hydrogen/methane concentrations were measured after ingestion of a combined lactulose nutrient drink every 15 min for 4 h. The patients underwent rectal sensitivity (rectal barostat) and OATT (radiopaque markers) investigations. Comorbid conditions (functional dyspepsia, anxiety, depression, and somatization) were assessed with questionnaires.Key results: After controlling for comorbid conditions, rectal sensitivity was associated with abdominal pain (p < 0.05), and more rapid OATT was associated with higher severity of abdominal discomfort, rumbling, nausea, and urgency (p < 0.05 for all) both pre- and post-prandially. Postprandial nausea, urgency, and abdominal pain changed differently over time depending on OATT (p < 0.05 for all). OATT, but not rectal sensitivity, was associated with hydrogen and methane concentrations (p = 0.002 for both). Trajectories over time of postprandial symptoms and exhaled hydrogen/methane concentrations were correlated with different correlations depending on OATT.Conclusion and inferences: This study highlights the importance of oroanal transit and hydrogen and methane production in the pathophysiology of IBS and increases our understanding of pathophysiological factors involved in postprandial symptom generation. Treatments targeting oroanal transit and hydrogen and methane production may improve specific postprandial symptoms

Causes of gastrointestinal bleeding in oral anticoagulant users compared to non-users in a population-based study.

To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowBackground/aims: Causes of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients on oral anticoagulants (OACs) are not well established. The aims of the study were to compare the causes of GIB in patients on OACs and those not on OAC therapy. Methods: A nationwide study of all GIB events in patients on OACs in Iceland from 2014-2019 was conducted. Bleeding events were obtained through ICD-10 codes and review of endoscopy databases, confirmed by review of medical records. For comparison, patients not on OACs from previous Icelandic population-based studies were used. Results: Among 752 GIB events in 12,005 patients on OACs, 273 (1.9%) had verified upper and 391 (2.7%) had verified lower GIB. For lower GIB, multivariate analysis showed that OAC users were more likely to have colonic polyps (OR 6.6, 95% CI: 2.4 - 17.8, p < .001) or colorectal cancer (OR 3.7, 95% CI: 2.0 - 7.0, p < .001) but less likely to have ischemic colitis (OR 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.26, p < .001). For upper GIB, bleeding from mucosal erosions (OR 4.0 95% CI: 2.5 - 7.9, p < .001) and angiodysplasia (OR 3.6, 95%CI: 1.5 - 8.6, p = .003) were more common in OAC users. Conclusions: A high proportion of GIB caused by colonic polyps and colorectal cancer among OAC patients indicates that OACs treatment may facilitate cancer diagnosis. The low proportion of ischemic colitis among those on OACs suggests that OACs provide a protective effect against ischemic colitis. OACs seem to increase the bleeding from angiodysplasia and mucosal erosive disease. Keywords: Gastrointestinal bleeding; anticoagulation; colon cancer; ischemic colitis.Eimskipasjodur University of Iceland Scientific grant of Landspital

Rivaroxaban Is Associated With Higher Rates of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Than Other Direct Oral Anticoagulants : A Nationwide Propensity Score-Weighted Study.

To access publisher's full text version of this article click on the hyperlink belowBackground: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) rates for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin have been extensively compared. However, population-based studies comparing GIB rates among different DOACs are limited. Objective: To compare rates of GIB among apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Design: Nationwide population-based cohort study. Setting: Landspítali-The National University Hospital of Iceland and the 4 regional hospitals in Iceland. Patients: New users of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban from 2014 to 2019. Measurements: Rates of GIB were compared using inverse probability weighting, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and Cox regression. Results: In total, 2157 patients receiving apixaban, 494 patients receiving dabigatran, and 3217 patients receiving rivaroxaban were compared. For all patients, rivaroxaban had higher overall rates of GIB (3.2 vs. 2.5 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.42 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.93]) and major GIB (1.9 vs. 1.4 events per 100 person-years; HR, 1.50 [CI, 1.00 to 2.24]) compared with apixaban. Rivaroxaban also had higher GIB rates than dabigatran, with similar point estimates, although the CIs were wider and included the possibility of a null effect. When only patients with atrial fibrillation were included, rivaroxaban was associated with higher rates of overall GIB than apixaban (HR, 1.40 [CI, 1.01 to 1.94]) or dabigatran (HR, 2.04 [CI, 1.17 to 3.55]). Dabigatran was associated with lower rates of upper GIB than rivaroxaban in both analyses. Limitations: Unmeasured confounding and small subgroup analyses. Conclusion: Rivaroxaban was associated with higher GIB rates than apixaban and dabigatran regardless of treatment indication.Icelandic Centre for Research Landspitali University Hospital Research Fun