Diagnostic assessment of autism in adults – current considerations in neurodevelopmentally informed professional learning with reference to ADOS-2

Services for the assessment and diagnosis of autism in adults have been widely criticized and there is an identified need for further research in this field. There is a call for diagnostic services to become more accessible, person-centered, neurodiversity affirming, and respectful. There is a need for workforce development which will increase capacity for diagnostic assessment and support for adults. ADOS-2 is a gold-standard diagnostic assessment tool for autism recommended in clinical guidelines. However, diagnostic procedures such as the ADOS-2 are rooted in the medical model and do not always sit comfortably alongside the neurodiversity paradigm or preferences of the autistic community. Training and educational materials need to account for the differences between these approaches and support clinicians to provide services which meet the needs of the adults they serve. The National Autism Implementation Team worked alongside ADOS-2 training providers to support clinicians in Scotland, to provide effective and respectful diagnostic assessment. The team engaged with clinicians who had attended ADOS training to identify areas of uncertainty or concern. Training materials were developed to support ADOS assessors to incorporate key principles including “nothing about us without us”; “difference not deficit”; “environment first”; “diagnosis matters,” “language and mindsets matter”; and “a neurodevelopmental lens,” to support the provision of neurodiversity affirming assessment practice. The National Autism Implementation Team also provided examples of actions which can be undertaken by clinicians to improve the assessment experience for those seeking a diagnosis. Training materials are based on research evidence, clinical experience, and the needs and wishes of autistic people

A brief neuro-affirming resource to support school absences for autistic learners: development and program description

Donald Maciver - ORCID: 0000-0002-6173-429X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-429XMarion Rutherford - ORCID: 0000-0002-2283-6736 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-6736Eleanor Curnow - ORCID: 0000-0001-9332-8248 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-8248Izy Utley - ORCID: 0009-0002-2937-1887 https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2937-1887Background: Education should be inclusive, nurturing each individual’s potential, talents, and creativity. However, criticisms have emerged regarding support for autistic learners, particularly in addressing disproportionately high absence levels within this group. The demand for accessible, person-centered, neuro-affirming approaches is evident. This paper provides a program description of a structured absence support framework, developed and implemented during and following the Covid-19 pandemic. We detail creation, content, and implementation. Methods: We collaborated with stakeholders, reviewed literature and drew on existing theoretical frameworks to understand absence in autistic learners, and produced draft guidance detailing practical approaches and strategies for supporting their return to school. The final resource was disseminated nationally and made freely available online with a supporting program of work around inclusive practices. Results: The resource is rooted in neuro-affirming perspectives, rejecting reward-based systems and deficit models of autism. It includes key messages, case studies and a planning framework. It aims to cultivate inclusive practices with an autism-informed lens. The principles promoted include recognizing the child’s 24-hour presentation, parental partnership, prioritizing environmental modifications, and providing predictable, desirable and meaningful experiences at school. Feedback to date has been positive in terms of feasibility, face validity, and utility. Conclusion: This novel, freely available resource provides a concise, practical framework for addressing absence in autistic learners by cultivating a more inclusive, equitable, and supportive educational system in which autistic individuals can thrive.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.13583549pubpu

Diagnostic Assessment of Autism in Adults -Current Considerations in Neurodevelopmentally Informed Professional Learning with reference to ADOS-2

Eleanor Curnow - ORCID: 0000-0001-9332-8248 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-8248Marion Rutherford - ORCID: 0000-0002-2283-6736 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2283-6736Donald Maciver - ORCID: 0000-0002-6173-429X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-429XServices for the assessment and diagnosis of autism in adults in the United Kingdom have been widely criticised and there is an identified need for further research in this field. There is a call for diagnostic services to become more accessible, person-centred, neurodiversity affirming, and respectful. In Scotland, there is a need for workforce development which will increase capacity for diagnostic assessment and support for adults. ADOS-2 is a gold-standard diagnostic assessment tool for autism recommended in clinical guidelines. However, diagnostic procedures such as the ADOS-2 are rooted in the medical model and do not always sit comfortably alongside the neurodiversity paradigm preferred by the autistic community. Training and educational materials need to account for the differences between these approaches and support clinicians to provide services which meet the needs of the adults they serve. The National Autism Implementation Team work alongside ADOS-2 training providers to support clinicians in Scotland, to provide effective diagnostic assessment within a respectful environment. The team engaged with clinicians who had attended ADOS training to identify areas of uncertainty or concern. Training materials were developed to support ADOS assessors to incorporate key principles including 'nothing about us without us;' 'difference not deficit;' 'environment first;' 'diagnosis matters,' 'language and mindsets matter;' and 'a neurodevelopmental lens,' to support the provision of neurodiversity affirming practice. The National Autism Implementation Team also provided examples of actions which can be undertaken by clinicians to enhance the assessment experience. Training materials are based on research evidence and clinical experience.14inpressinpres

Data_Sheet_1_Diagnostic assessment of autism in adults – current considerations in neurodevelopmentally informed professional learning with reference to ADOS-2.pdf

Services for the assessment and diagnosis of autism in adults have been widely criticized and there is an identified need for further research in this field. There is a call for diagnostic services to become more accessible, person-centered, neurodiversity affirming, and respectful. There is a need for workforce development which will increase capacity for diagnostic assessment and support for adults. ADOS-2 is a gold-standard diagnostic assessment tool for autism recommended in clinical guidelines. However, diagnostic procedures such as the ADOS-2 are rooted in the medical model and do not always sit comfortably alongside the neurodiversity paradigm or preferences of the autistic community. Training and educational materials need to account for the differences between these approaches and support clinicians to provide services which meet the needs of the adults they serve. The National Autism Implementation Team worked alongside ADOS-2 training providers to support clinicians in Scotland, to provide effective and respectful diagnostic assessment. The team engaged with clinicians who had attended ADOS training to identify areas of uncertainty or concern. Training materials were developed to support ADOS assessors to incorporate key principles including “nothing about us without us”; “difference not deficit”; “environment first”; “diagnosis matters,” “language and mindsets matter”; and “a neurodevelopmental lens,” to support the provision of neurodiversity affirming assessment practice. The National Autism Implementation Team also provided examples of actions which can be undertaken by clinicians to improve the assessment experience for those seeking a diagnosis. Training materials are based on research evidence, clinical experience, and the needs and wishes of autistic people.</p