Estimation of Reserves for Improving the Results of Patients with Multipresistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis in the Application of Surgical Methods Based on Analysis of the Efficiency of Conservative Treatment of a Specified Cohort

In order to improve the results of treatment of patients with multi-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis with the use of surgical methods, the effectiveness estimation of conservative treatment of 176 patients with this form of tuberculosis according to cohort analysis data in two districts of Kyiv were done.In the list were included following parameters: type of the tuberculosis, its clinical-radiological form and the prevalence of the process, the results of conservative treatment in patients who completely finished the course of anti-TB chemotherapy and the results of conservative treatment of 81 patients who had indications for surgical treatment but had not been operated. Processing of the materials of the study was carried out with the use of licensed software products included in the Microsoft Office Professional 2007 package. The predicted results of treatment were calculated on the condition of surgical intervention.Out of the total sample of patients, 31.3 % of the patients completed treatment. Mortality was 16.5 %, transferred to palliative care 11.9 %. More than one in three patients (35.2 %) stopped treatment at different times from the start.According to the clinic of thoracic surgery SU "National Institute of Phthisiology and Pulmonology named after F.G. Yanovsky NAMS of Ukraine ", the overall effectiveness of treatment for patients with limited multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with the use of surgical intervention is about 95 % in the absence of mortality. We have modelled the potential results of treatment of the selected cohort in case of the surgical stage is fully and timely applied in a complex of therapeutic treatment. If all 81 patients with indications for surgical treatment used that way, then, with the above efficiency, a complete cure could be predicted in 77 patients (44.5 % of the total number of observations), which in turn would allow predicting the achievement completion of treatment at 64.2 % with complete cure for 60.6 % of patients.Thus, it is established that the positive result of surgical treatment in the general complex of treatment measures in patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis is able to improve the results of treatment of this contingent more than twice, reduce the mortality almost by three times, reduce the need for repeated courses of treatment from 7.4 % to 1.7 %, as well as to reduce the epidemiological reservoir of infection due to a significant decrease in the number of patients with failure to treat tuberculosis, interrupted and palliative treatment

Nonstandard Errors

In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty-nonstandard errors (NSEs). We study NSEs by letting 164 teams test the same hypotheses on the same data. NSEs turn out to be sizable, but smaller for more reproducible or higher rated research. Adding peer-review stages reduces NSEs. We further find that this type of uncertainty is underestimated by participants

Non-Standard Errors

In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: Non-standard errors (NSEs). We study NSEs by letting 164 teams test the same hypotheses on the same data. NSEs turn out to be sizable, but smaller for better reproducible or higher rated research. Adding peer-review stages reduces NSEs. We further find that this type of uncertainty is underestimated by participants

Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, myosteatosis as factors of poor prognosis in gastrointestinal tract tumors: sistematic review

Background. Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancer includes a broad spectrum of tumors with generally high prevalence and poor prognosis. Over the past decade sarcopenia (skeletal muscle depletion), myosteatosis, sarcopenic obesity were all shown to have a negative prognostic impact in patients with various malignancies. However, the role of myosteatosis in patients with GI tumors remains controversial.&#x0D; Aim. To summarize recent literature regarding the impact of myosteatosis on the surgical treatment of patients with GI malignancies.&#x0D; Materials and methods. PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant original studies published between Jan. 2011 and Dec. 2021. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).&#x0D; Results. 34 studies comprising 15 295 patients were included. Patients with myosteatosis had significantly poorer overall survival (hazard ratio 0,506, 95% confidence interval 0,4310,595; p0,05). There was no significant influence of myosteatosis on recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 0,658, 95% confidence interval 0,3891,112; p0,05). Myosteatosis was significantly associated with the occurrence of major postoperative complications in 6 studies. However, only 3 studies supported the impact of myosteatosis on mortality.&#x0D; Conclusion. This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients with preoperative myosteatosis have poor long-term survival following treatment for GI malignancy. Therefore, myosteatosis might be used as a prognostic tool. However, more studies with standardized definitions and cut-offs are required.</jats:p