9 research outputs found
Frameworks for Formation and Stability of Kurgan Regional Arboretum Phytocenosis
The article is devoted to solving the problem of biodiversity conservation in the framework of increasing sustainability of natural plant communities in arboretum being an artificial protected area. Research and application have accumulated significant knowledge on various aspects of the above problem, specifically, preserving biodiversity including vegetation, monitoring biodiversity and preserving phytocenosis, plant interaction in phytocenosis, causes of disturbed biodiversity and reducing phytocenosis stability, etc. The research objective is to theorize the frameworks for phytocenosis formation, identify the factors influencing phytocenosis stability, conduct observations and experimental research on the factors affecting the formation and stability of the Kurgan regional arboretum phytocenosis. The models of the way different factors influence the resistance mechanisms of the Kurgan regional arboretum phytocenosis are built as a result of studying research materials and differ from the theoretical model in the fact that the proven distinctions were found in the ratio of limiting and background factors reflecting their regional character
Method of technical and operational risks evaluation in the process of endoscopes reprocessing
Purpose of the study: Analysis and evaluation of technical and operational risks of flexible endoscopes reprocessing. Materials and methods: Statistical 2016-18yy data of technical and chemicals reprocessing endoscopy rooms equipment and partially data of endoscopes technical service and repairing of Sverdlovsk regional medical facilities have been analyzed. Mathematical analysis has been performed with universal multiply sectioned Bayesian network. Results: Analysis of availability of equipment and chemical consumables evaluated that 85% of endoscopic units use manual reprocessing, which with careful competent approach shows relatively small (22,75%) technical operational risk. Most endoscopy units - 89%, use non enzymatic cleaning solutions and evaluate middle close to high (49,94%) technical operational risk due to potential fixation of micro residual organics, when aldehydes are using for high level disinfection leading for biofilms, which evidently (evidence level A) can destroy endoscopic channels. Aldehyde sare using in 82% endoscopy units, oxygen containing agents based on peracetic acid in 18%. It can be considered as relatively small (24,3%) technical operational risk if use after proper cleaning and exposure modes compliance. Conclusion: Generalized flexible endoscopes reprocessing technical operational risk can be evaluated by analysis of three main criteria: method - manual or automatic, processing chemicals - for cleaning: enzymatic or nonenzymatic, for high level disinfection: aldehydes or oxygen peracetic acid based solutions. Considered risk can be reduced from middle to small (25% and lower) by enzymatic cleaning solutions priority use.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ: ΠΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ². ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΠΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π‘Π²Π΅ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π·Π° 2016-18Π³Π³ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ², ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ, Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ² Π·Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄. ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° Π±ΡΠ» ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ ΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±Π°ΠΉΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ: ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π», ΡΡΠΎ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ 85% ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ± ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ², ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π±Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΌ, Π³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ (22,75%) ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ. ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ (89%) ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π·ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π±Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΊ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ (49,94%) ΡΠΈΡΠΊ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈΠ·-Π·Π° ΡΠΈΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅ Π΄Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΊ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅, Π² ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ². ΠΠ»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ΄Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ Π΄Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² 82% ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π½Π°Π΄ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ - Π² 18% ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π²Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ (24,3%) ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ. ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅: Π‘ΡΠΌΠΌΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎ-ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΌ: ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΉ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ± ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ: ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ; ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈ: ΡΠ½Π·ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π·ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅; ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΠΠ£ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ: ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ΄Ρ. Π‘Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΌΠΌΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ (25% ΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅) ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ½Π·ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ²
Frameworks for Formation and Stability of Kurgan Regional Arboretum Phytocenosis
The article is devoted to solving the problem of biodiversity conservation in the framework of increasing sustainability of natural plant communities in arboretum being an artificial protected area. Research and application have accumulated significant knowledge on various aspects of the above problem, specifically, preserving biodiversity including vegetation, monitoring biodiversity and preserving phytocenosis, plant interaction in phytocenosis, causes of disturbed biodiversity and reducing phytocenosis stability, etc. The research objective is to theorize the frameworks for phytocenosis formation, identify the factors influencing phytocenosis stability, conduct observations and experimental research on the factors affecting the formation and stability of the Kurgan regional arboretum phytocenosis. The models of the way different factors influence the resistance mechanisms of the Kurgan regional arboretum phytocenosis are built as a result of studying research materials and differ from the theoretical model in the fact that the proven distinctions were found in the ratio of limiting and background factors reflecting their regional character