Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationClinical decision support systems (CDSS) and electronic health records (EHR) have been widely adopted but do not support a high level of reasoning for the clinician. As a result, workflow incongruity and provider frustrations lead to more errors in reasoning. Other successful fields such as defense, aviation, and the military have used task complexity as a key factor in decision support system development. Task complexity arises during the interaction of the user and the tasks. Therefore, in this dissertation I have utilized different human factor methods to explore task complexity factors to understand their utility in health information technology system design. The first study addresses the question of generalizing complexity through a clinical complexity model. In this study, we integrated and validated a patient and task complexity model into a clinical complexity model tailored towards healthcare to serve as the initial framework for data analysis in our subsequent studies. The second study addresses the question of the coping strategies of infectious disease (ID) clinicians while dealing with complex decision tasks. The study concluded that clinicians use multiple cognitive strategies that help them to switch between automatic cognitive processes and analytical processes. The third study identified the complexity contributing factors from the transcripts of the observations conducted in the ID domain. The clinical complexity model developed in the first study guided the research for identifying the prominent complexity iv factors to recommend innovative healthcare technology system design. The fourth study, a pilot exploratory study, demonstrated the feasibility of developing a population information display from querying real complex patient information from an actual clinical database as well as identifying the ideal features of population information display. In summary, this dissertation adds to the knowledge about how clinicians adapt their information environment to deal with complexity. First, it contributes by developing a clinical complexity model that integrates both patient and task complexity. Second, it provides specific design recommendations for future innovative health information technology systems. Last, this dissertation also suggests that understanding task complexity in the healthcare team domain may help to better design of interface system

Heuristics in managing complex clinical decision tasks in experts decision making

pre-printBackground: Clinical decision support is a tool to help experts make optimal and efficient decisions. However, little is known about the high level of abstractions in the thinking process for the experts. Objective: The objective of the study is to understand how clinicians manage complexity while dealing with complex clinical decision tasks. Method: After approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), three clinical experts were interviewed the transcripts from these interviews were analyzed. Results: We found five broad categories of strategies by experts for managing complex clinical decision tasks: decision conflict, mental projection, decision trad e-offs, managing uncertainty and generating rule of thumb. Conclusion: Complexity is created by decision conflicts, mental projection, limited options and treatment uncertainty. Experts cope with complexity in a variety of ways, including using efficient and fast decision strategies to simplify complex decision tasks, mentally simulating outcomes and focusing on only the most relevant information. Application: Understanding comp lex decision making processes can help design allocation based on the complexity of task for clinical decision support design

Additional file 1: of Understanding complex clinical reasoning in infectious diseases for improving clinical decision support design

CDM ID Script. (DOCX 94 kb