Early detection of pancreatic cancer:the juicy details

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease, for which timely detection and early surgical resection provide the only chance of cure. In individuals with an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer (high-risk individuals), including those with a hereditary predisposition or neoplastic pancreatic cyst, surveillance may lead to earlier detection and improved survival. However, it is debatable whether these benefits weigh up to its drawbacks, such as patient anxiety, harm by overtreatment and increased healthcare expenses.While malignant transformation is difficult to identify with current imaging modalities, (cancer) cells constantly shed various materials to surrounding tissues. We postulate that measuring these substances in blood and pancreatic juice may serve as indicators for high-grade dysplasia or early-stage cancer. The detection of a biomarker signature in blood and pancreatic juice may stratify high-risk individuals by cancer risk and bring forth a surveillance program with tailored intervals and modalities. The ultimate goal of such a marker panel is to detect pancreatic cancer at a curable stage, while minimizing surveillance-related harms.This thesis critically appraises current recommendations for pancreas surveillance (PART I) and evaluates the potential of biomarker analysis in blood and pancreatic juice (PART II).<br/

The additive value of CA19.9 monitoring in a pancreatic cyst surveillance program

Pancreatic cysts; Surgical intervention; SurveillanceQuists pancreàtics; Intervenció quirúrgica; VigilànciaQuistes pancreáticos; Intervención quirúrgica; VigilanciaBackground Surveillance of pancreatic cysts focuses on the detection of (mostly morphologic) features warranting surgery. European guidelines consider elevated CA19.9 as a relative indication for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the role of CA19.9 monitoring for early detection and management in a cyst surveillance population. Methods The PACYFIC-registry is a prospective collaboration that investigates the yield of pancreatic cyst surveillance performed at the discretion of the treating physician. We included participants for whom at least one serum CA19.9 value was determined by a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Results Of 1865 PACYFIC participants, 685 met the inclusion criteria for this study (mean age 67 years, SD 10; 61% female). During a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 24, 1966 visits), 29 participants developed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer. At baseline, CA19.9 ranged from 1 to 591 kU/L (median 10 kU/L [IQR 14]), and was elevated (≥37 kU/L) in 64 participants (9%). During 191 of 1966 visits (10%), an elevated CA19.9 was detected, and these visits more often led to an intensified follow-up (42%) than those without an elevated CA19.9 (27%; p < 0.001). An elevated CA19.9 was the sole reason for surgery in five participants with benign disease (10%). The baseline CA19.9 value was (as continuous or dichotomous variable at the 37 kU/L threshold) not independently associated with HGD or pancreatic cancer development, whilst a CA19.9 of ≥ 133 kU/L was (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1–13, p = 0.03). Conclusions In this pancreatic cyst surveillance cohort, CA19.9 monitoring caused substantial harm by shortening surveillance intervals (and performance of unnecessary surgery). The current CA19.9 cutoff was not predictive of HGD and pancreatic cancer, whereas a higher cutoff may decrease false-positive values. The role of CA19.9 monitoring should be critically appraised prior to implementation in surveillance programs and guidelines

Size and Concentration of Extracellular Vesicles in Pancreatic Juice from Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) and their cargo may provide promising biomarkers for the early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Although blood-borne EVs are most frequently studied as cancer biomarkers, pancreatic juice (PJ) may represent a better biomarker source because it is in close contact with the ductal cells from which PDAC arises. It is, as yet, unknown whether PDAC results in a distinct type or increased number of particles in PJ and whether this has diagnostic value. METHODS: Secretin-stimulated PJ was collected from the duodenum of 54 cases and 117 nonmalignant controls under surveillance for PDAC. Serum was available for a subset of these individuals. The vesicular composition of these biofluids was analyzed with nanoparticle tracking analysis. RESULTS: The concentration of EVs did not differ between controls and PDAC cases. However, a higher number of large vesicles were found in PJ (but not serum) for patients with PDAC compared with controls. DISCUSSION: The composition of isolated EVs from PJ, but not serum, is altered in patients with PDAC. This suggests that PJ may carry disease-specific markers not present in serum and provides a valuable biomarker source for PDAC diagnosis. The nature of the larger particles in EV isolates from PJ of PDAC cases requires further investigation

Mutation Analysis of Pancreatic Juice and Plasma for the Detection of Pancreatic Cancer

Molecular profiling may enable earlier detection of pancreatic cancer (PC) in high-risk individuals undergoing surveillance and allow for personalization of treatment. We hypothesized that the detection rate of DNA mutations is higher in pancreatic juice (PJ) than in plasma due to its closer contact with the pancreatic ductal system, from which pancreatic cancer cells originate, and higher overall cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations. In this study, we included patients with pathology-proven PC or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) from two prospective clinical trials (KRASPanc and PACYFIC) for whom both PJ and plasma were available. We performed next-generation sequencing on PJ, plasma, and tissue samples and described the presence (and concordance) of mutations in these biomaterials. This study included 26 patients (25 PC and 1 IPMN with HGD), of which 7 were women (27%), with a median age of 71 years (IQR 12) and a median BMI of 23 kg/m2 (IQR 4). Ten patients with PC (40%) were (borderline) resectable at baseline. Tissue was available from six patients (resection n = 5, biopsy n = 1). A median volume of 2.9 mL plasma (IQR 1.0 mL) and 0.7 mL PJ (IQR 0.1 mL, p &lt; 0.001) was used for DNA isolation. PJ had a higher median cfDNA concentration (2.6 ng/μL (IQR 4.2)) than plasma (0.29 ng/μL (IQR 0.40)). A total of 41 unique somatic mutations were detected: 24 mutations in plasma (2 KRAS, 15 TP53, 2 SMAD4, 3 CDKN2A 1 CTNNB1, and 1 PIK3CA), 19 in PJ (3 KRAS, 15 TP53, and 1 SMAD4), and 8 in tissue (2 KRAS, 2 CDKN2A, and 4 TP53). The mutation detection rate (and the concordance with tissue) did not differ between plasma and PJ. In conclusion, while the concentration of cfDNA was indeed higher in PJ than in plasma, the mutation detection rate was not different. A few cancer-associated genetic variants were detected in both biomaterials. Further research is needed to increase the detection rate and assess the performance and suitability of plasma and PJ for PC (early) detection.</p

The additive value of CA19.9 monitoring in a pancreatic cyst surveillance program

Background:Surveillance of pancreatic cysts focuses on the detection of (mostly morphologic) features warranting surgery. European guidelines consider elevated CA19.9 as a relative indication for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the role of CA19.9 monitoring for early detection and management in a cyst surveillance population. Methods: The PACYFIC-registry is a prospective collaboration that investigates the yield of pancreatic cyst surveillance performed at the discretion of the treating physician. We included participants for whom at least one serum CA19.9 value was determined by a minimum follow-up of 12 months.Results: Of 1865 PACYFIC participants, 685 met the inclusion criteria for this study (mean age 67 years, SD 10; 61% female). During a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 24, 1966 visits), 29 participants developed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer. At baseline, CA19.9 ranged from 1 to 591 kU/L (median 10 kU/L [IQR 14]), and was elevated (≥37 kU/L) in 64 participants (9%). During 191 of 1966 visits (10%), an elevated CA19.9 was detected, and these visits more often led to an intensified follow-up (42%) than those without an elevated CA19.9 (27%; p &lt; 0.001). An elevated CA19.9 was the sole reason for surgery in five participants with benign disease (10%). The baseline CA19.9 value was (as continuous or dichotomous variable at the 37 kU/L threshold) not independently associated with HGD or pancreatic cancer development, whilst a CA19.9 of ≥ 133 kU/L was (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1–13, p = 0.03). Conclusions: In this pancreatic cyst surveillance cohort, CA19.9 monitoring caused substantial harm by shortening surveillance intervals (and performance of unnecessary surgery). The current CA19.9 cutoff was not predictive of HGD and pancreatic cancer, whereas a higher cutoff may decrease false-positive values. The role of CA19.9 monitoring should be critically appraised prior to implementation in surveillance programs and guidelines.</p

Early detection of pancreatic cancer:the juicy details

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease, for which timely detection and early surgical resection provide the only chance of cure. In individuals with an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer (high-risk individuals), including those with a hereditary predisposition or neoplastic pancreatic cyst, surveillance may lead to earlier detection and improved survival. However, it is debatable whether these benefits weigh up to its drawbacks, such as patient anxiety, harm by overtreatment and increased healthcare expenses.While malignant transformation is difficult to identify with current imaging modalities, (cancer) cells constantly shed various materials to surrounding tissues. We postulate that measuring these substances in blood and pancreatic juice may serve as indicators for high-grade dysplasia or early-stage cancer. The detection of a biomarker signature in blood and pancreatic juice may stratify high-risk individuals by cancer risk and bring forth a surveillance program with tailored intervals and modalities. The ultimate goal of such a marker panel is to detect pancreatic cancer at a curable stage, while minimizing surveillance-related harms.This thesis critically appraises current recommendations for pancreas surveillance (PART I) and evaluates the potential of biomarker analysis in blood and pancreatic juice (PART II).<br/